For the Worker:
means of reinforcement
information about work goal attainment
source of feedback to improve performance
For the Supervisor:
basis for making personnel decisions
assessment of workers' goal attainment
opportunity to provide constructive feedback to workers
opportunity to interact with subordinates
For the Organization:
assessment of productivity of individuals and work units
validation of personnel selection and placement methods
means for recognizing and motivating workers
source of information for training needs
evaluation of the effectiveness of organizational interventions
Research has been done on numerous facets of performance appraisals (PA), including psychometric issues, rater-ratee characteristics, cognitive processes, rater training, and appraisal fairness (Bretz, Milkovich, and Read, 1992). How PAs are used has been shown to influence rating behavior and outcomes (for example, Jawahar and Williams, 1997) and to be an important predictor of employee attitudes toward their supervisor, the job, and the appraisal process (Jordan and Nasis, 1992). In the Meyer, Kay, and French (1965) study, for example, researchers proposed that conducting salary discussions during the annual performance review interfered with the constructive discussion of plans for future performance improvement and could lead to negative reactions. However, in the first empirical test of the Meyer, Kay, and French study, salary discussion was found to have either no impact or a slightly positive impact on employee attitudes (Prince and Lawler, 1986). Thus, how PAs are used has developed as an area of interest, yielding mixed results and conclusions.
Previous research has relied on PA administrators (human resource managers, for example) to provide information on how the appraisal is used (Cleveland, Murphy, and Williams, 1989). As suggested by Bretz, Milkovich, and Read (1992), these respondents may be describing the PA system as intended instead of actual practice. An alternative approach is to investigate the appraised individuals' perceived PA use. If people perceive PA purposes differently, as has been suggested , then attitudes may vary depending on that perception. For example, how a PA is used may signal to employees their value to and future in the organization.
Firms engage in the performance-evaluation process for numerous reasons. Managers may conduct appraisals to affect employee behavior through the feedback process, or to justify some sort of human resource management action (termination, transfer, promotion, etc.). However, many other benefits may also accrue from the information yielded by the appraisal. These benefits include increases in knowledge regarding the effectiveness of selection and placement programs, training and development needs, budgeting; human resource planning, and reward decisions.
One current problem which performance appraisal faces is that the term is often used synonymously with that of "performance management". Yet performance management is clearly more than a new name for performance appraisal ( Fletcher, 1992 ) defines performance management as: "an approach to creating a shared vision of the purpose and aims of the organisation, helping each individual employee understand and recognise their part...