Preview

Pepsi Co. Analysis of Company

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
3650 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Pepsi Co. Analysis of Company
Introduction:
“Our approach to superior financial performance is straightforward - drive shareholder value. By addressing social and environmental issues, we also deliver on our purpose agenda, which consists of human, environmental, and talent sustainability” (Pepsi Co.). Since 1898, Pepsi Co. has been satisfying the thirst of people all over the world. The history, corporate governance, culture, and management philosophy of Pepsi Co., is what has made this Corporation prosper for the last 112 years. Pepsi Co. thrives through its financial stability. To learn more about Pepsi Co., we will need to start back in 1898 when Pepsi Co. first became.
Return on Asset Ratio:
Return on assets measures a company’s earnings in relation to all of the resources it had at its disposal (the shareholders’ capital plus short and long-term borrowed funds). To calculate the return on asset ratio (ROA): (Net Income + Interest Expense)/Total Assets = ROA. The lower the profit per dollar of assets, the more asset-intensive a business is. The higher the profit per dollar of assets, the less asset-intensive a business is. All things being equal, the more asset-intensive a business, the more money must be reinvested into it to continue generating earnings. This is a bad thing. If a company has a ROA of 20%, it means that the company earned $0.20 for each $1 in assets. As a general rule, anything below 5% is very asset-heavy (manufacturing, railroads); anything above 20% is asset-light (advertising firms, software companies).
Pepsi Co.’s ROA for the year ending 2008 is 15.2%. For the year ending 2009, Pepsi Co’s ROA is 15.9%. In translation, for the year ending 2009 Pepsi Co. has earned $0.159 of every $1.00 in assets. The year before, Pepsi Co.’s ROA was 15.2%; a .7% increase from 2009. Calculations were done as followed:

Year | 2009 | 2008 | Net Income | $5,946,000.00 | $5,142,000.00 | Interest Expense | $397,000.00 | $329,000.00 | Total Assets | $39,848,000.00 |

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    This was the situation earlier but now Pepsi is a full-fledged and growing company. It has covered all its losses and is now growing at a rapid rate…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Miss

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages

    For public companies, ROA varies substantially and depends to a large extent on the type of industry. As a comparative measure, ROA for public companies is best applied by comparing it with the company’s previous ROA or with a similar company’s ROA. Since debt and equity financing are utilized to provide for the operations of such companies, ROA gives an indication to investors as to how effectively the invested money is being converted into net income. A high ROA indicates to investors that the company is successful in earning more money with less investment.…

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    ACC 501 Case 3

    • 664 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The assets of the company are comprised of both debt and equity. Both of these types of financing are used to fund the operations of the company. The ROA figure gives investors an idea of how effectively the company is converting the money it has to invest into net income. The higher the ROA number, the better, because the company is…

    • 664 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Acct4120

    • 310 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Assume that the present value of the operating leases is 60% of the cash payment amount. What journal entry would Pepsi make to capitalize its operating leases?…

    • 310 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The rate of return on assets for Dollar General for 2010 was 6.8% thus for each dollar the company used it earned $0.068. For 2009 ROA was 3.8%, so ROA increased between 2009 and 2010 fiscal years. Profit Margin for ROA is 4.8% for 2010 and for 2009 is 2.9%. We can see an increase in the profit margin for ROA ratio as well. Total Assets turnover ratio for 2010 is 1.4 and for 2009 is 1.3. The increase in ROA in 2010 resulted from increase in profit margin for ROA. Increase in ROA might be result of the decrease in cost of goods sold to sales percentage (numbers are taken from annual report) for almost 1 percent. That might be because Dollar General cut its costs for purchasing merchandise at a lower cost or it more actively sells its private line of products. Another reason might be that the company reduced its sales of home products and apparel and shifted more towards the sales of consumables. We can also see decrease in selling and administrative expenses to sales percentage this might have resulted from the increased demand on cheap products because of the economic situation. The assets turnover ratio might increased due to increase in sales especially the shift to consumables which have a higher turnover in comparison with apparel.…

    • 623 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    • Return on Assets (ROA) Ratio shows the after tax earnings of assets and is an indicator of how profitable a company is. Return on assets ratio is the key indicator of the profitability of a company. It matches net profits after taxes with the assets used to earn such profits. A high percentage rated indicates the company is well run and has a healthy return on assets. Net Profit After Taxes ÷ Total Assets…

    • 2428 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The first step in this analysis process is to review the financial statements and determine both companies return on assets (ROA), profit margin, and asset utilization. The ROA is computed by taking the net income and dividing it by the total assets. First we will look at the ROA for Verizon. The company reported $10,198B in net…

    • 1187 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The return on total assets (ROA) is an overall measure of profitability which measures the total effectiveness of management in generating profits with its available assets. This ratio indicates the amount of net income generated by each dollar invested in assets. The higher the firm's return on total assets, the better. Harley Davidson's return on total assets was 14.04% for 2001, 14.27% for 2000. These percentages are high and show an upward trend, this shows strong performance in this area for the past two years.…

    • 1572 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Return on assets (ROA) is a measure of profit per dollar of assets” (book 449) The ROA is calculated by dividing the net income by total assets. “The return on equity (ROE) is a measure of how the stockholders fared during the year” (book 449). The ROE is called by dividing the net income by the total equity. In 2016, StilSim’s ROA was 2.1% and ROE was 2.7%. StaffAces ROA was 2.7% and ROE was…

    • 1224 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Capsim Success Measures

    • 706 Words
    • 7 Pages

    RETURN ON ASSETS (ROA) Formula Description: You determine return on assets by dividing net profit by your total asset base. What Does Return On Assets Tell You?…

    • 706 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Revenue growth for Coca-cola is less than PepsiCo; the proceeds from the Coca-cola in 2005 and 2004 were $23104.00 and $21,742.00. In 2005 and 2004 turnover was lower than PepsiCo. Cost of goods sold by PepsiCo was $11,031.00 and $12,314.00 in 2004 and 2005. Cost of sales increased it was 111.63% compared to 2004. Cost of sales of Coca-cola was $7674.00 and $8195.00 and that was an increase in 2005 compared to 2004. PepsiCo earnings total operation was 112.61% compared to previous years. The total operating revenue for Coca-cola was 105.79% in comparison to other years. The net income for PepsiCo was $4,078.00 and $4,212.00 in 2005 and 2004. The net results for Coca-cola were $4,847.00 and $4,872.00 in 2005 and 2004. PepsiCo operating profit was $5,259.00 and $5,922.00 in 2004 and 2005. PepsiCo operating expenses were 111.85% and 11.85% in 2005 than 2004. Coca-cola operating expenses were 110.75% and 10.75% than 2004. In this comparison it looked that Coca-cola had the upper…

    • 1114 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Return On Assets – indicates how profitable a company is related to its total assets and tells an investor how much profit a company generated for each dollar of…

    • 2400 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Weygandt, J. J., Kimmel, P. D., & Kieso, D. E. (2008). Financial accounting (6th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.…

    • 1780 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Both Coca-Cola Company and PepsiCo, Inc. used a comparative report format, that list the sections one above the other, on the same page, to present their balance sheets.…

    • 644 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    As indicated the above data, ABC Sports Ltd.’s return on assets are 57.6%, 43.6% and 33.5% from 2013 to 2015. In other words, ABC Sports Ltd. generated respectively $0.576 cents, $0.436 cents and $0.335 cents on every dollar from fiscal year 2013 to 2015. The data indicates how well a firm can make a profit on its investment in assets, and it is also a good indicator that how effectively a firm is using its…

    • 150 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays