Preview

Patriot Act vs Civil Rights

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
592 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Patriot Act vs Civil Rights
The Patriot Act vs. Civil Rights The Patriot Act clearly violates the constitutional rights of those living directly under it. There are many reports of United States citizen’s civil rights being violated. Phone conversations being listened in on when no terrorist conversations were taking place. Private medical records being looked at, personal computers being tapped into and web site visits being checked and arrests taking place with no solid proof that any crime took place. The accused weren’t even granted the opportunity to be allowed legal representation to defend them. And in America we as citizens are supposed to be protected by the United States Constitution which contains a Bill of Rights section that is supposed to protect citizen’s rights and freedoms who live under it. Because of the Patriot Act being passed into law the civil liberties of United States citizens were being violated based on stereotypical opinions and ideas of fellow citizens who share the same homeland as them. President Bush stated in his National Security Strategy that terrorism will be defeated by “Using every tool in our arsenal including law enforcement.”He went further in his National Strategy for Homeland Security, where he stated that we have historically “used our laws to promote and safeguard our security and our liberty. The law will both provide People of Muslim or Arab descent aren’t the only ones getting falsely arrested under the Patriot Act. A caucasian woman named Tamera Freeman was arrested for spanking her child on a commercial airline, and people have been arrested for raising their voices on airlines also. In Baltimore a group of animal activists were arrested for filming the police officers overseeing their demonstration. And an 8th grade student was brought in for questioning when he decided to write a paper about the Golden Gate Bridge and was discovered to be checking out research material about the bridge at his local library. None of these cases resulted


Bibliography: www.archives.gov The United States Constitution www.epic.org “USA Patriot Act Page” 10/24/2001 www.nolan chart.com The Patriot Act www.ushistory.org “The Electric Ben Franklin” copyright 1999 www.youtube.com Documentary Unconstitutional: The War on Civil Liberties 6/12/2007 David Cole and Jules Lobel- Are We Safe? Los Angeles Times: Opinion 11/18/2007

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Syllabus

    • 1217 Words
    • 5 Pages

    References: Department of Justice. (2011). The USA PATRIOT Act: Preserving Life and Liberty. Retrieved from http://www.justice.gov/archive/ll/highlights.htm…

    • 1217 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 2001, people are quick to dismiss the idea of an internment of American citizens, suggesting that the country has come a long way from 1942. The hypothesis that the government might conduct surveillance or use illegal wiretaps to monitor groups or individuals that it suspects of domestic terrorism seemed foreign before September 11th, and now has become a way to gain more information about potential suspects. These new measures, included in the USA Patriot Act, delicately trace the line between national security and civil liberties. A brief look at how the Bush…

    • 522 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Patriot Act Pros And Cons

    • 3614 Words
    • 15 Pages

    On October 26th, 2001, just 45 days after September 11th a panicked Congress passed, with little debate, the USA Patriot Act. The 342 page patriot act violates our 1st, 4th, 5th, 6th, 8th and 14th amendments, thus making it unconstitutional. I don't know why Congress passed this act, or how it got through the Supreme Court, but most people in Congress didn't even read the Patriot Act. I am sure that our founding fathers would not have wanted the Patriot Act. Just look at what Ben Franklin said, "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."…

    • 3614 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    As the Patriot was enacted so quickly, and with little oversight, a full review with the complete participation of Congress could allow for positive revisions. Without losing the major benefits, such as increased security and safety for our nations citizens, collective law enforcement cooperation and information sharing, and speeding up investigations by making legitimate use of surveillance easier to enact, taking another look at this incredibly powerful law is imperative. Allowing government authority to surpass that which the Constitution allows is completely contradictory to the founders intentions, and to the principles on which this nation was founded. As stated by Benjamin Franklin in his Pennsylvania Assembly Reply to the Governor, “those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety” (Franklin, 1755). This is important to remember, as our nation becomes more accepting of tighter scrutiny in our private lives, all in the name of safety and security. Our world is changing, to be certain, though the extent in which we allow that change is solely in our hands, we, the people of the United…

    • 1499 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    This first section provides a brief explanation of the history of the Patriot Act. A common misconception about the Patriot Act is that it takes away personal liberty and is an unprecedented power grab by the federal government. What most people do not realize is that the Patriot Act, for the most part, only amends and updates current law, as opposed to creating entirely new laws. In his remarks on the Senate floor while pushing for passage of this act, Senator Patrick Leahy acknowledged that some of the amendments presented for consideration may have been unconstitutional. Leahy said, “After that terrible day of September 11, we began looking at our laws, and what we might do. Fortunately for the country . . . we took time to look at it, we took time to read it, and we took time to remove those parts that were…

    • 2253 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    The U.S. PATRIOT Act (Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism) is the most important law passed after the 9/11 attack. It is so essential because of the fact that it improves inter-agency cooperation for the collection of intelligence andit’s sharing. This barrier being broken down has contributed to a very large extent the protection of the US. Additionally, it appreciates the fact that the advent of technologyensures that our laws are updated and has encouraged better prosecution of suspected terrorists. Lastly, it has strengthened the existing terrorism legislations, reflecting some specific situations that did not exactly exist previously. These are the things that make the PATRIOT Act a great addition to law enforcement.…

    • 783 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Ender's Game

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages

    I believe that the government still has a right to perform those actions because it is for the overall safety of the people. Organizations such as The American Civil Liberties Union are protesting and criticizing the Patriot Act. I think that their arguments are not justified. Most of the citizens in the United States are not trying to perform a terrorist attack or break criminal laws. The people that are, are the ones that are affected by this act. If a citizen has nothing to hide, then they have nothing to worry about because they are not being…

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Patriot Act was designed to try and eliminate acts of terrorism on the United States. This act was signed in 2001 by president George W. Bush. Just weeks after the terrorist attacks on 9/11(NBCNews). The Patriot Act allows for the government to identify terrorist. “This is done by wiretapping and monitoring text messages and phone calls’’(Diamond).I am not saying that are civil liberty aren't important but when it comes to keeping our citizens safe then this is the only choice. People who have nothing to hid should have no problem with the government monitoring them for the sake of people's lives. The patriot act has allowed for at least 50 terrorist attacks against the United States to be foiled since 9/11.(Johnson) This Act is doing…

    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Civil rights organizations have noted that the USA Patriot Act violates six constitutional amendments of the Bill of Rights. In 2005, Congress tried to pass a law that would ban American flag burning but not any other flags. If that law had passed you could've burned an Argentian or Seanagalion flag with no consequences. The courts ruled it would be a violation of the 1st amendment and the law was…

    • 286 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    TOPIC: In what ways, if any, have terrorists exploited religion, the media and democratic processes to pursue their goals?…

    • 2391 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are six flaws to the act that was passed into law on October 26th, 2001: It takes away civil rights, by doing so it destroys the definition of what it means to be an American Citizen [ (talkradio101, 2010) ]. The feeling is that by destroying our way of life is the best way to reward or give victory to the terrorist [ (topix, 2012) ]. Secondly, Constitutional protections are violated, the U.S. Constitution is the most lasting, well-written document, and this is why our nation has become the most successful nation [ (talkradio101, 2010) ]. People from all over the world have migrated here for the freedom of religious practice, now you can be tracked to your place of worship which violates the 1st Amendment violation), you can be held without trial, without representation or facing the witnesses against them which are violations of the 6th and 7th Amendments. Third is potential for abuse by current administration and future administrations, this “War on Terror” potentially has no end; there will not be a cease fire or peace treaty signed to officially end the war like in nation-vs.-nation wars [ (talkradio101, 2010) ]. This means that the “time of danger” will never end and that the government will continue to violate our rights [ (NPR, 2012) ]. Fourthly is the act increases the possibility for racial profiling or other means of discrimination and harassment, we have many law-abiding loyal Americans who are of Arab decent, have Muslim Beliefs and work in high profile careers, such as nuclear scientist and biowepons experts [ (NPR, 2012) ]. We have come a long way in our many civil rights abuses of the past and something like this could cause a detrimental slip backwards for our nations [ (talkradio101, 2010) ]. Fifth flaw is the use of gathered information by government for non-terror/political purposes, this information could be used for blackmail, embarrassment of rivals to further a career or gain the upper…

    • 446 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Louise I. Gerdes. San Diego: Greenhaven Press, 2005. Opposing Viewpoints Resource Center. Gale. SAN JOSE PUBLIC LIBRARY SYSTEM. 2 Dec. 2008 http://0- find.galegroup.com.mill1.sjlibrary.org:80/ips/start.do?prodId=IPS. Bader, Eleanor J. "The Patriot Act Discourages the Free Exchange of Ideas." Current Controversies: Free Speech. John Boaz. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2006. Opposing Viewpoints Resource Center. Gale. SAN JOSE PUBLIC LIBRARY SYSTEM. 8 December 2008 http://0-find.galegroup.co m.mill1.sjlibrary.org:80/ips/start.do?prodId=IPS. " How Patriot Act 2 Would Further Erode the Basic Checks on Government Power That Keep America Safe and Free." American Civil Liberties Union. 30 Oct. 2002. ACLU Foundation. 2 Dec. 2008 http://w ww.aclu.org/safefree/general/17346leg20030320.html Levendosky, Charles. "Unconstitutional Sections of the Patriot Act Should Be Repealed." Opposing Viewpoints: The Patriot Act. Louise I. Gerdes. San Diego: Greenhaven Press, 2005. Opposing Viewpoints Resource Center. Gale. SAN JOSE PUBLIC LIBRARY SYSTEM. 2 December 2008 . Miller, Amy, and Ryan Lozar. "The Patriot Act Threatens Students ' Privacy…

    • 269 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Developed “to deter and punish terrorist acts in the United States and around the world, to enhance law enforcement investigatory tools, and for other purposes” the USA Patriot Act, bears the formal name ‘‘Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism (USA Patriot Act, 2001, p. 1). Heretofore referred to as the “Patriot Act” the USA Patriot Act was signed into law within 6 weeks from initial draft to final approval supporting the enforcement of laws for the ultimate protection of the United States and her citizens by granting access to persons and information with liberal criminal and civil procedure exceptions. The Patriot Act immediately granted broad-based interrogation, surveillance and isolation abilities to law enforcement when investigating “crimes against terror” (US Government, 2011)…

    • 1282 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The NSA Date Breach

    • 3360 Words
    • 14 Pages

    Since 2001, post the 9/11 attacks on the World Trade Centers and Pentagon, the United States government has beefed up its counter-terrorism security, under the leadership of both democratic and republican presidents. However, the U.S. is always one step behind the terrorists, or though it seems. Al-Qaeda took to the air, so, the U.S. increased airport security measures (Knowles, 2013). In the last 12 years, so many changes to airport security have been implemented, most, in reaction to terrorist threats; undergarment bombs, shoe bombs, liquid bombs and many others. Traveling through an airport is so difficult because of all these regulations (Hall and Patrick, 2006). In attempt to discontinue this reactionary security, the U.S. is monitoring pretty much all digital activity, both within homeland United States and on foreign soil. While this was all but a theory, thought to be possible but still fictionalized by the likes of Hollywood, earlier this year, an the NSA analyst, namely Edward Snowden, leaked documentation in an official act of treason against the U.S., confirming the existence of such a program (McWhirter and Bible, 1992). Throughout this paper, I will provide sufficient background information and evidence that will analyze directly how the U.S. government and the NSA specifically, breached the rights of its citizens, as well as, offer both sides of the argument for doing so. I will focus on third-party involvement from big data companies like Apple, Google, and Facebook on providing private customer information to the government, both before and after the Snowden leaks. To culminate my research I’ll explore the differences between keeping tab on U.S. citizens and non-U.S. citizens using constitutional support.…

    • 3360 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Program that helped rent-to-own stores track and recover rented computers. The software contained a program known as “Detective Mode” that tracked renter locations…

    • 1280 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays