Preview

Paradoxes in Plato's Republic

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2775 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Paradoxes in Plato's Republic
Paradoxes are ideas that seem to be in opposition to one another but are mutually needed to function. In Plato 's Republic he discusses several paradoxes. While reading The Republic we can see which side of these paradoxes Plato favors. We find which side he feels should be stressed so that we may live in a reasonable and safe society and be better human beings. There are three categories in which these paradoxes have been divided into: ethical, metaphysical and political. Plato was a legendary Athenian philosopher. His main influence was his teacher, Socrates, whom he thought died unjustly. The Republic was written in dialogues narrated by Socrates. These dialogues were Socrates ' teachings as best Plato could remember them. His writings left an undeniable mark on the world. The Republic was one of his most famous works. It outlines the core of his beliefs.
Politically, Plato explains the paradox of justice and the law. Plato believes that absolute justice is the same for everyone without exception. This justice goes beyond power and or money. He feels justice is not necessarily the law. "Law is an imperfect form of justice." What is legal is not necessarily moral. In Book 1 of Plato 's The Republic, Plato explains that justice is a balance between reason, courage and man 's needs or in other words, the head, the heart and the stomach. He goes on to explain that justice or fairness does not always mean equal. The law may change but justice remains constant. A good rule or law however is a just rule. Plato felt that to get people to act justly one must teach them ethics and values. He also believed that along with these ethics and values we must have a reasonable understanding of these rules. An understanding of these rules is needed so people are more apt to comply with them and therefore maintain a just and fair society.
Another paradox discussed in Plato 's The Republic is authority and liberty. Plato strongly favors authority. He has little faith in

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Justice played a very important role in Plato’s philosophy. After chastising different theories of justice, he came up with his own theory, he said justice was a human virtue; it is what makes a person good. Individually, justice can make a person good and self-consistent, but socially it could bring harmony to society. Plato’s idea of justice was all about virtue and goodness. Plato also believed that justice was an essential part of an ideal society. Because it brought more light and could cure bad things.…

    • 1169 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato was an interesting individual, and has always been one of my favorite Philosophers. I personally like most of his political ideals, and find them almost in alignment with my own. In particular I like his reasoning when it comes to the citizens that make up the city-state, along with the leadership. So throughout this essay I plan on drawing from the Republic to talk more about this Philosopher’s ideas.…

    • 694 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What is justice is a question that has plagued philosophers since the time of Plato when he wrote The Republic to present day. In the book, Plato uses the dialectic, between Socrates and other Athenians like Polemarchus, Cephalus, and Glacuon, to try and find the definition of justice. Through the voice of Glaucon, Plato defines justice as a compromise of sorts between advantage and fear, and injustice as the things that we wouldn’t…

    • 962 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Plato had several thoughts regarding how much freedom is necessary in order to achieve a just society. First, Plato addressed…

    • 1744 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato and Thrasymachus

    • 1065 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Plato has a different sense of justice than what we ourselves would consider to be justice. Justice starts in the heart and goes outward. Justice is about being a person of good intent towards all people, doing what is believed to be right or moral. Plato believes that once a person has a true understanding of justice that they will want to be “just” for its own benefit regardless of good or bad consequence. Though being just is known to have good consequences also makes being “just” a positive trait. (Clark, 2003, 13) Living a “just” life is good and good is the “well being of well living, the best life is supreme good.” (Bao, 2011, 259) The cause of our happiness is better than being happy itself, which is why this is powerful. We can look at supreme good as experiencing all good things without feelings of regret. (Bao, 2011, 259)…

    • 1065 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    What is justice? Today, where it is common for people to only look out for themselves, justice is an extremely important tool. But what exactly is justice? What is right, what is wrong, and who decides that? To find an accurate definition, we as a society should not just focus on one opinion, but the views of many. Similar to how our society is today, the society in The Republic, lived the same, struggling to determine what the correct definition of justice was, and how to pursue the right answer. In the paper, I will be discussing all aspects of Plato’s Republic, including the Philosopher King and his nature, and justice in that time.…

    • 114 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Plato, Machiavelli

    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In Machiavelli's time, as it is today, the States whole reason for being was to serve the citizens. The ruler, therefore, is justified in doing whatever is necessary to maintain the country or state, even if it is unjust. In Plato's time, man served the state. According to the viewed that ethics and politics are the same, or at least co-terminous. There was no distinction between private life and public life, as there is today. Plato argues a ruler can never be unjust. Plato argues against this type of ruler, who rules solely by might. Plato tries to prove that it is always better to be just than unjust ,…

    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Republic evaluates the concept of justice and engages the reader in thinking about the true meaning of justice as the characters within the book dispute the matter. Plato also devises a society that is perfectly just. This utopia created also develops an education system where everyone will have the opportunity to receive the same education. Even women, Plato suggests, can be incorporated into the education system and be equal to men in society. This is why I believe Republic to be one of the most important texts. It addresses many issues that during this time were considered dangerous. Another important aspect of this texts is the allegory of the cave. I particularly enjoyed learning about this allegory because on many levels it holds true. Through education, exposure, and experience we can become not only self-aware, but also aware of how nature and society function. It also addresses the treatment of those who remain ignorant and how to be a moral and just…

    • 880 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    According to Plato, “Using the written word to give a distorted image of the nature of the gods and heroes, completely fails to capture the likeness of the original,” (Book II, p46). An author or poet cannot simply say whatever he or she likes, rather there needs to be truth in what they are writing. In order to understand why Plato takes this stand, it’s important to have an idea of the time in history he was in. At this time many of the strong leaders were apt on building strong intelligent soldiers who would be able to conquer other nations and empires. To fill the minds of the future generation with fantastical stories of hero’s and distraught God’s, in Plato’s mind, only served to weaken the minds of the people. Stories that filled the minds of people with fear, sadness, or excessive pleasure indulged a part of the mind that did not need to be indulged…“If the young men of our community hear this kind of thing and take it seriously, rather than regarding it as despicable and absurd, they’re hardly going to regard such behavior as despicable in human beings like themselves and feel remorse when they also find themselves saying or doing these or similar things,” (Book III, p54).…

    • 366 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Plato makes the reader question reality. There is so much one does not know outside of what one is accustomed…

    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cited: Plato. Republic. Classics of Moral and Political Theory. Ed. Michael L. Morgan. Fourth ed. Indianapolis: Hackett Pub., 2011. 75-77. Print.…

    • 1397 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Ring of Gyges and The Myth of Er are two stories that can be found in the book, “Plato Republic.” These specific stories can be compared and contrasted deeply regarding the topic of wisdom. While theses legends possess very similar morals their History and information vary tremendously.…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Was Plato a totalitarian

    • 1486 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Plato was a totalitarian judging from The Republic. With the definition of totalitarianism in mind, Plato illustrates features of authoritarianism and ideology in his political worldview, which entails a strict division of classes, the dependency of the fate of the state on the ruling class as well as the superiority of the interests of the ruling class over the subservient and inferior classes. Furthermore, the uncompromising rules for breeding and educating this class combined with the strict supervision and collectivisation of the interests of its members create a close enough representation of the totalitarianism depicted in the definition. Firstly, in addressing the issue, which Plato begins with in The Republic of what justice is Plato, asserts that justice is that which is in the interest of the…

    • 1486 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    By the beginning of Book II of Plato’s The Republic, many questions have been brought upon the table involving the definition of justice. Polemarchus argues that justice is doing good to your friends and harm to your enemies. Thrasymachus argues that justice is the advantage of the stronger. Socrates finds flaws in both of these definitions, but discovers another important question about the nature of justice. Socrates wants to know whether the just life or the unjust life is better, or happier, but all arguments thus far have proved unsatisfactory. Book II aims to further outline this complicated question, and hopefully lead them closer to an answer.…

    • 843 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato wrote The Republic to elaborate on what justice is in society. He divided it into different books to explain the different aspects of justice. Everyone has their own view of what justice is but Plato thoroughly explains how society views justice as a whole, defines what justice is, and who and what the just man is. In book six and seven Plato explains what the good is and gives three analogies: the sun, the line and the cave. Plato declines the two ideas that good is knowledge or pleasure. Plato cannot exactly define what the good is, which is why he uses these analogies to help explain where goodness comes from, and what it truly is. The analogies of the sun, the line, and the cave will be thoroughly explained along with my insight…

    • 212 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays