Preview

paper

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
729 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
paper
Is Profanity called for? Is free speech and the dangers of limiting vocabulary only society’s choice of acceptable words? Is profanity even called for? Is it good or bad parenting to teach your children to use profanity at such a young age? Does censoring words hinder a person’s ability to express their opinion regarding something? Amendment One states “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.” (Constitution). Jill McCorkle grandly gives her son who was eight years old at the time, five minutes a day in which he could cuss and bounce on the couch. When the kitchen timer rang, all the cussing ended until the next day. Jill McCorkle said “I have often thought what a better, more confident person I would have been if only I had grown up with cuss time instead of soap licking.” In response to this it is important now in time to be raised with a voice. McCorkle raised her child to have freedom and potential to do what he wants. Experience creates honesty. Limiting or denying freedom of speech and expression would affect many. McCorkle said, “When character and situation called for it-I did use strong language. I couldn’t imagine a realistic portrait of human nature, particularly in our contemporary society without it”. Strong language does not have to be looked at as being negative all the time. For example if I was to stomp my toe I would react and say “shit” or fuck”. But this does not have to be a negative input. Now-a-days our generation uses cuss words in everyday language. Do they think it’s a second nature to cuss? Kids and teenagers cuss because it is a freedom and they are allowed to its way of them expressing themselves. Even if they weren’t allowed to they will still do it. McCorkle said “The more we

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Throughout the world there are many different views on the use of swear words in everyday life. From evening family slot times to late night tv shows, cursing in society is slowly becoming part of our “normal” day to day language. Whether or not it is accepted is something different. Society has often labeled swearing one of two things: as an extreme type of language only used by the uneducated or the greatest use of power words that should be used by any and all people. Though swearing is offensive to many, it is proven to be a major extension of our vocabulary and should be tolerated and understood to a greater extent.…

    • 1232 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Paper

    • 390 Words
    • 2 Pages

    production. Elaine is the lead manager on MIP and she is worried that the latest research results do not look…

    • 390 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    School Board of Norfolk, 801 F.Supp. 1526 (E.D. Va. 1992). Here, a middle school student, Kimberly Broussard, wore a t-shirt that read “Drugs Suck”. Her parents sued on her behalf claiming that her shirt was a form of free speech protected by the First Amendment of the United States. Here, the courts ruled in favor of the school board, saying that although the shirt displayed an anti-drug message, the word “suck” was considered a vulgar word with a sexual connotation and therefore not allowed in school because it interfered with the classroom learning environment. Id. at…

    • 656 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    First, society has an interest in protecting kids (especially those in the audience) from lewd , vulgar , and sexually explicit speech. Also, schools have a duty to teach student speakers the “habits and manners of civility” essential to democratic governance. Schools must teach students to responsibly consider the sensibilities of others, even when exercising their right to express unpopular viewpoints. Schools may reasonably conclude the boundaries of socially appropriate behavior cannot adequately be taught to students in an environment where the right to communicate in lewd, vulgar, and sexually explicit terms are absolute. Therefore, schools can constitutionally punish students for vulgar and lewd speech inconsistent with their educational…

    • 930 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Paper

    • 1320 Words
    • 6 Pages

    "At the very heart of any understanding of Pompeii and its archaeology must be the demands of the tourist, who as Maiuri explained was the client of archaeology..."…

    • 1320 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Despite the fact that the First Amendment protects offensive speech, the Supreme Court has created a category of unprotected speech that consists of “fighting words.” In Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire, the Court defined fighting words as “words which by their very utterance inflict injury or tend to incite an immediate breach of peace.” The Court established that in order for the speaker's speech to fall under the fighting words doctrine the speech must be directed to an individual face-to-face and the words must have a tendency to cause the average person to respond with an immediate violent action. Fighting words are not subject to First Amendment protection because they don’t convey ideas and are not of social value.…

    • 118 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Paper

    • 343 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Hi all! Here is an extra credit for you to work on for unit 3 if you would like some extra points added to your unit 3 exam score. It is due by midnight on Friday, November 12. It is of course completely optional. Please e-mail your answers to me here in the internal e-mail.…

    • 343 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    It can ruin a person chance of working in a highpoint due to the vulgar language they use or even just getting a regular job because where ever you are working your language reflects the company. It is also harmful to a person’s speech as their diction will be smaller due to cuss words replacing proper and meaningful words in sentences. In addition to that cussing provides no actually emotional benefits as proposed by some as effective methods and proof of them working have been around to help rather then ruining the language you speak by flooding your vocabulary with foul language to satisfy an emotion. This has proven that cussing is totally a waste of time for the people in society to use cause a lot more problems then its…

    • 1165 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Paper

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages

    My case is the one of fourteen year old James Ingraham vs. his middle school principle Willie J. Wright Jr. James’ parents are suing the Middle school their son attends (Charles R. Drew Junior High School) because they feel that their son was condemned to cruel and unusual punishment and has lost his liberty as a citizen of the United States. On October 6, 1970, Ingraham and another student were called into the principal’s office. James’ offense was failing to leave the school auditorium stage when instructed to do so by a teacher. Once in the principal’s office, James announced his innocence against the accusations of the teacher. Mr. Wright was unconvinced and ordered Ingram to bend over the table so that Wright could spank him using the discipline paddle. Ingraham refused to do so, and Wright began to force James’ head down on the table. The assistant Principal, Lemmie Deliford, assisted Wright by holding Ingraham’s legs. Wright then proceeded to strike Ingram with the paddle over 20 times, resulting in Ingram getting a hematoma. The hematoma resulted in Ingraham being hospitalized and requiring rest for eleven days.…

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Paper

    • 1676 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Name: Kaitlyn Boal [pic]EN 290 Introduction to Mass Media Exam I True /False: Please indicate whether the following statements are true or false (T/F) T 1.…

    • 1676 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Cuss Time Summary

    • 236 Words
    • 1 Page

    In Jill McCorkles’s article “Cuss Time” she explains, “By limiting or denying freedom of speech and expression, we take away a lot of potential.” With saying this McCorkle backs up her argument with many different personal stories and experiences. The title “Cuss Time” comes from an experience between McCorkle and her son. When McCorkle saw her son “. . . silently mouthing a lot of new vocabulary while riding in the car or drawing,” she decided to let him have “Cuss Time” McCorkle explains for 5 minutes a day he was allowed to say any word he wanted, but when Cuss Time ended he wasn’t allowed to cuss till the next twenty four hour period when Cuss Time started again. Part of McCorkles’s reasoning was without cussing (Or other words society has viewed as wrong or bad) it limits our potential in how we express ourselves. Her last point that she addressed was if these words are taken away then more will be taken until it’s a dead language. “Word by word, our history will be rewritten if we don’t guard and protect it. . .). In this quote she basically says our language will be changed if we don’t stand up and take action on our Freedom of Speech. Throughout her essay McCorkle gives a strong argument to support her thesis and get her opinion across.…

    • 236 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Examining former cases, the courts have stated that forbidding certain words is overbroad. Looking at a case like Cohen v. California, The Supreme Court overturned the original conviction of offensive conduct for wearing a jacket with “fuck the draft” written on it. Fighting words were then narrowed down to being directed to another to create danger. They also acknowledged the difference between cognitive and emotion meanings of words. The justices argued that even though the speech was disturbing and offensive, there was no clear and present danger. According to the Cohen case the speech has to be directed to another in such a way as to create danger. In the case of the Feminist United Group, the comments were shocking, but no evidence of actual danger or violence was present.…

    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Do Words Matter?

    • 1035 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Words are very powerful, and sometimes the words we use offend people. Freedom of speech is highly valued but what happens when your freedom becomes hurtful or disrespectful to someone else? There are so many different kinds of people and different things that offend each person. In this day where we are more inclined to say whatever we want, we see more and more offense being taken to the words that get said. It's hard to understand why certain words can be insulting to someone when it may not seem that way to you. We have to ask ourselves, why do we care what other people say and should we censer everything that goes into the public just so people don't get offended?…

    • 1035 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The "Politically Correct" movement's purpose is to bring historically condescending terms, offensive music and art, and controversial educational content to an end and replace them with more positive and less-offending references. Offensive and demoralizing efforts are wrong, but the censorship and deletion of words and phrases that do not contain the intention to demoralize are taking political correctness too far. Politically correct (or "PC") antics have created a social decline that is growing worse with each generation, specifically regarding areas of art, education, language, and our right to freedom of speech; the degradation they have brought to the American psyche has even led to name-changing.…

    • 1156 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    For the first time in our history, Americans have to be fearful of what they say, of what they write, and of what they think. There is an importance of using politically correct statements to address the diverse population. They have to be afraid of using the wrong word, a word denounced as offensive or insensitive, or racist, sexist, or homophobic. (Lind) The First Amendment is not supporting the theory of free speech currently because everyone from authority figures, to the schoolyard population is challenged by what they say.…

    • 4084 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays