In this article, Milgram presents his theory of obedience. He wanted to understand a new aspect of human nature that wasn’t explored before. He provided examples from his experiment to support his findings. His experiment was set up to determine how people would react to an authority?…
The first reason that Milgram found that people obey is because people feel like they have to obey someone if they have a high social status or a highly respected job, this is called legitimate authority. Bickman (1974) supported this theory by doing an experiment on the streets of New York. Bickman had three men dress up as a policeman, a guard and a regular passerby in a shirt and tie, he then had the three men ask other passerby’s to either pay a parking fine or pick something of the floor, it was found that the policeman was generally obeyed more as he was of a highly respected profession and had legitimate authority. In Milgram’s study, the participants all obeyed the researcher because he was dressed in a lab coat with a clipboard to show his authority, but the setting of the experiment also gave the researcher authority as the setting was inside Yale University. Another support experiment was done by Hofling. Hofling found that obedience to authority is still very high as his study of the 22 nurses; all but one nurse obeyed the unknown doctor and went to administer double the allowed dose of an unknown drug. Rank and Jacobson questioned the validity of Hofling’s study for three main reasons; the first reason is that the drug the nurses were asked to administer was fictional, and it was unlikely the nurses had heard of it. The second reason is that it would also have been very unlikely that the nurses would have not heard of the ‘unknown doctor’ as it was very unlikely that the nurses wouldn’t know all the doctors in the hospital. The third reason was that the ‘unknown doctor’ rang when the nurses were all alone on the ward, which would never have happened as they would never have been completely alone without anyone to ask or…
Obedience is omnipresent; it is difficult to differentiate between obedience and conformity, therefore it is a complicated subject of social psychology. However, Stanley Milgram was devoted to understand the phenomena of obedience, and created a dramatic masterpiece. Interested in many different aspects of life, Stanley Milgram was an influential key figure in psychology. However his work on the field of obedience is respected and still exiting for both psychologists and lay people. The aim of this essay is to expose the historical context of his book together with its influences, while demonstrating a deep understanding of his groundbreaking work.…
In The Perils of Obedience, Stanley Milgram expresses his findings of an experiment he conducted trying to prove the lengths people will go to be obedient to authority.…
In this chapter on the research of obedience, studying the psychological actions and reactions, the implications brought forth are the surprising effects of simple commands and the subliminal influence. The articles “The Perils of Obedience”, by Stanley Milgram, and “Opinions and Social Pressure”, by Solomon E. Asch, both exhibit the traits of simple, ordinary test subjects following orders and actions by someone who is illustrated to have power or the general consensus but realistically do not.…
In 1963, Stanley Milgram, a professor of psychology at Yale University, designed and conducted a series of very controversial experiments to test one’s limits of obedience (Milgram 358). Milgram wanted to measure participants’ willingness to obey an authority figure who instructed them to perform acts conflicting…
23. What is obedience? What was Stanley Milgram’s experiment? What are factors that affected the level of obedience in the individuals he studied?…
The Milgram experiment led to similar results, as it was designed to demonstrate the level of obedience that individuals will provide in response to who they perceive to be an authoritative figure. The study produced shocking results, indicating that 65% of people would be willing to issue at 300 volt shock to an innocent individual if they were encouraged to do so by an authoritative figure. Although the Milgram experiment was designed to produce a different type of results, both experiments were manifested as a method to depict the relationship between average human beings and authoritative figures.…
The Milgram experiment, as it is now called, was considered a turning point in social psychology and the science of obedience. In a new study from Poland, a group of researchers wanted to see if the premise held up. That is, 50 years later, would people still respond to an authority figure in the same way as they did in Milgram's original experiment? "Upon learning about Milgram's experiments, a vast majority of people claim that 'I would never behave in such a manner,'" study co-author Tomasz Grzyb, a social psychologist at the SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities in Poland, said in a statement.…
Social psychology can be defined as social influence. Such influence could impact the beliefs, values, behavior or feelings of others. People influence others or are influenced by them. Professional social psychologists study and conduct research and experiments to further understand the nature of this influence and to understand the human social behavior. Unlike professional social psychologists, armature social psychologists - and people as a whole – tend to think they comprehend, predict or speculate how people would act or behave as they overestimate their power of prediction; the hindsight bias. While in fact, their hypotheses of most basic and simple social experiences’ outcomes are wrong. Similarly, in the experiment where experimenters found that people tend to desire more the forbidden behavior after being severely threatened, while armature social psychologists thought they would, reasonably enough, that subjects wouldn’t engage in that forbidden behavior. Therefore, professional social psychologists can based upon evidence and detailed data taken from maintained and controlled experiment draw more precise conclusions and analysis of human social behavior and how influence contributed to that behavior. Social psychology showed with concrete evidence that people who act crazy are not necessarily crazy. People when put in intense situations and undergo social influence that might trigger an abnormal behavior were merely responding to that influence.…
In a magazine article titled Obedience to Authority, published in 1974 by Harper’s magazine, Dr. Stanley Milgram studied the effects of authority on “ordinary” people. His findings were astonishing. The obedience to authority figures, with no threat of repercussion, was not only underestimated, but unimaginable. The constant willingness to comply with what was asked of them reminded me of the cult led by Charles Manson, specifically the Sharon Tate murders.…
In the words of Stanley Milgram, “The disappearance of a sense of responsibility is the most far-reaching consequence of submission to authority.” In ‘Obedience to Authority’ he further states, “Ordinary people, simply doing their jobs, and without any particular hostility on their part, can become agents in a terrible destructive process. Moreover, even when the destructive effects of their work become patently clear, and they are asked to carry out actions incompatible with fundamental standards of morality, relatively few people have the resources needed to resist…
Certain kinds of behavior are difficult to observe because they occur only rarely or only in private. With archival analysis, the original writers may not have included all the information researchers would later need. Social psychologists want to do more than just describe behavior. They want to predict and explain it.…
Three Sociological Perspectives . Compare the differences among the three major theoretical perspectives in sociology (structural-functionalism, conflict theory, and symbolic interactionism). With which theory and theorist do you find that you share similar views with and why?…
PRINTED BY: Najwa Naderi <najwa.naderi14@gmail.com>. Printing is for personal, private use only. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted without…