Organizational Behavior Case Study
Question 2:
Several symptoms indicating the problems exist in Lacrosse Inc have been stated in the previous analysis. We have identified three sources of the problem which are: - Changing in leadership style - Differentiation - Commnication -
In this part we will try to analyze the underlying cause of the problems using two leadership theories, namely path-goal leadership theory and competencies perspectives of leadership.
Moreover, we will try to relate this case with other Organizational Behavior theory. We have identified that this problems create a kind of conflict in the organization. So, we decide to approach this case with theory of conflict. Here, we will only use two sources of conflict, namely differentiation and communication.
A. Path-Goal Leadership Theory
This theory is one of the theories which belong to Contingency perspective of leadership. Contingency perspective of leadership is based on the idea that the most appropriate leadership style depends on the situation. Most contingency leadership theories assume that an effective leader must be both insightful and flexible. They must be able to adapt their behavior and styles to the immediate situation.
Path-goal leadership theory incorporated expectancy theory of motivation into the study how leader behaviors influence employee perceptions of expectancies (paths) between employee effort and performance (goals).
This model specifically highlightes four leadership styles and several contingency factors leading to three indicators of leader effectiveness.
In this following are the four leadership styles:
• Directive These are clarifying behaviors that provide a psychological structure for subordinates. The leader clarifies performance goals, the mean to reach those goals, and the standard against which the performance will be judged. This style also includes judicious use of rewards and disclipinary actions.
• Supportive This behavior provides psychological support for
Several symptoms indicating the problems exist in Lacrosse Inc have been stated in the previous analysis. We have identified three sources of the problem which are: - Changing in leadership style - Differentiation - Commnication -
In this part we will try to analyze the underlying cause of the problems using two leadership theories, namely path-goal leadership theory and competencies perspectives of leadership.
Moreover, we will try to relate this case with other Organizational Behavior theory. We have identified that this problems create a kind of conflict in the organization. So, we decide to approach this case with theory of conflict. Here, we will only use two sources of conflict, namely differentiation and communication.
A. Path-Goal Leadership Theory
This theory is one of the theories which belong to Contingency perspective of leadership. Contingency perspective of leadership is based on the idea that the most appropriate leadership style depends on the situation. Most contingency leadership theories assume that an effective leader must be both insightful and flexible. They must be able to adapt their behavior and styles to the immediate situation.
Path-goal leadership theory incorporated expectancy theory of motivation into the study how leader behaviors influence employee perceptions of expectancies (paths) between employee effort and performance (goals).
This model specifically highlightes four leadership styles and several contingency factors leading to three indicators of leader effectiveness.
In this following are the four leadership styles:
• Directive These are clarifying behaviors that provide a psychological structure for subordinates. The leader clarifies performance goals, the mean to reach those goals, and the standard against which the performance will be judged. This style also includes judicious use of rewards and disclipinary actions.
• Supportive This behavior provides psychological support for