Management, Work and Society: Occupational Choice
MANAGEMENT, WORK AND SOCIETY
OCCUPATIONAL CHOICE
LIST OF CONTENTS
Introduction………………………………………………………………………….. 3
Discussion……………………………………………………………………………… 4
Conclusion……………………………………………………………………………. 11
Bibliography…………………………………………………………………………. 12
References……………………………………………………………………………. 13
Appendices…………………………………………………………………………… 14
INTRODUCTION
This assignment aims to provide an understanding and key concepts on occupational choice, supported with theories and evidence drawn from relevant research, theorists, case studies and other academic source. The discussion will highlight on the relationship between non-work structural factors, individual approaching work and work sphere structural factors as suggested by Watson (Appendix I).
Rather than discussing this topic on a generalist view and referencing to different countries and cultures, the findings and argument would be only be focused on the population, society and environment of Hong Kong. Bearing in mind globalisation and Hong Kong being a globally recognised cosmopolitan, the discussion should bring representation of other major cities and correlation can be found.
Both developmental and structural approaches are influential to people’s career choice as proven by number of theories and studies. In the developmental approach, Ginzberg (1951) suggests that occupational choice evolves through three major phrases from childhood to adolescence. With changing trends and transforming society, structural approach brings greater relevance in explaining factors which drives decisions on career. The findings may help explained the debate of whether people’s role are achieved or ascribed or perhaps a mixture of both.
It will be useful to understanding the factors that drives people into a particular career, as it can bring efficiency and effectiveness in job selection for both potential employer and employee, helps to make a more accurate decision on whether an individual is suited
OCCUPATIONAL CHOICE
LIST OF CONTENTS
Introduction………………………………………………………………………….. 3
Discussion……………………………………………………………………………… 4
Conclusion……………………………………………………………………………. 11
Bibliography…………………………………………………………………………. 12
References……………………………………………………………………………. 13
Appendices…………………………………………………………………………… 14
INTRODUCTION
This assignment aims to provide an understanding and key concepts on occupational choice, supported with theories and evidence drawn from relevant research, theorists, case studies and other academic source. The discussion will highlight on the relationship between non-work structural factors, individual approaching work and work sphere structural factors as suggested by Watson (Appendix I).
Rather than discussing this topic on a generalist view and referencing to different countries and cultures, the findings and argument would be only be focused on the population, society and environment of Hong Kong. Bearing in mind globalisation and Hong Kong being a globally recognised cosmopolitan, the discussion should bring representation of other major cities and correlation can be found.
Both developmental and structural approaches are influential to people’s career choice as proven by number of theories and studies. In the developmental approach, Ginzberg (1951) suggests that occupational choice evolves through three major phrases from childhood to adolescence. With changing trends and transforming society, structural approach brings greater relevance in explaining factors which drives decisions on career. The findings may help explained the debate of whether people’s role are achieved or ascribed or perhaps a mixture of both.
It will be useful to understanding the factors that drives people into a particular career, as it can bring efficiency and effectiveness in job selection for both potential employer and employee, helps to make a more accurate decision on whether an individual is suited
References: The non-work structural factors that influence individuals approaching work are Class, Family, Education, Race, Gender, and Media and Peer Influences (Watson, 2012), affecting their occupational choice. Equal Opportunities Commission (2013). "Uniquely Me!": The EOC Encourages Youths to Embrace Their Individuality and Build an Inclusive Hong Kong. Retrieved from http://www.eoc.org.hk/EOC/GraphicsFolder/ShowContent.aspx?ItemID=11869 Forestier, K McClatchey, C. (2013, February 7). What is the key to a successful education system?. BBC News. Retrieved from http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-21354932 Vella, F Zhang, Z. (2012, April 26). Society 's male nurse grudge. Global Times. Retrieve from http://www.globaltimes.cn/NEWS/tabid/99/ID/706939/Societys-male-nurse-grudge.aspx Census and Statistics Department HKSAR. (2012). 2011 Population Census – Thematic Report: Ethnic Minorities. Retrieve from http://www.censtatd.gov.hk Ellis, L., Ratnasingam, M Ngo, J. (2013, September 5). Dollars-not coffee-define social status, say Hongkongers. South China Morning Post. Retrieve from http://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/article/1303450/dollars-not-coffee-define-social-status-say-hongkongers Lau, E Peña-Talamantes, A. E., Roach, T. A., Ueno, K. (2012). ‘Sexual Orientation and Occupational Attainment’ Rigg, C., Stewart, J. (2011). Learning and Talent Development. London: Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development The Sutton Trust Watson, T. J. (2012). Sociology, Work and Organisation (6th Edition) Oxfordshire: Routledge APPENDICES