Preview

Nuclear Weapons Debate

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
290 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Nuclear Weapons Debate
Nuclear Weapons Debate
The icing of my debate is the use of nuclear weapons. This is all about public controversies relating to the use of nuclear weapons. Nuclear disarmament refers to both the act of reducing or eliminating nuclear weapons and to the end state of a nuclear-free world.
It is said by Edward Gladstone. “We look forward to the time when the power of love will replace the love of power. Then our world will know the blessing of peace”-
The use of nuclear power is highly fatal and mortal for the living. It is economically indispensible to be made. Money utilized for the making of nuclear weapons could be utilized for other good purposes. If we even use it we’ll have a cross fight. As a result of this awful nuclear weapon the innocent people get affected because the bomb doesn’t look at innocent and guilty it just destroys everything in its range. The effects of massive killing and radiations of the nuclear attack remain for many years and centuries. “United we stay, together we fall”
It is a misconception that we can show our strengths by nuclear weapons, but in my opinion I say that rather than using nuclear power to show your strength we should stand united as a nation to show we are a strong chain of strong barriers which would remove any kind of danger for our country. It was said by Mother Teresa “if we have no peace, it is because we have forgotten that we belong to each other”.

Nuclear weapons not only destroy the property of people but also affect the consciousness of people, so I would never think that nuclear weapons are necessary to maintain peace.
Thank

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    President, Dwight D. Eisenhower, gave a speech on the issues of nuclear weapons in his speech, “Atoms for Peace” (1953). This speech was given at the United Nation General Assembly. Eisenhower’s purpose in this speech is to inform the people of the United States and the United Nations, that they want a peaceful outcome with other countries that are building nuclear weapons. Throughout his speech he gives a sense of peace. He explains that the United States government will do whatever they can so that all of us can live in peace. Eisenhower gives caution and concern, as he was worried for the U.S. safety.…

    • 540 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ki-Moon Pros And Cons

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages

    To illustrate the issue, next year the NNSA is seeking one point three billion dollars to work on six different types of nuclear weapons. Not to mention that the Congressional Budget Office estimates that the United States will use around three hundred and fifty-five billion dollars on their nuclear arsenal (Feinstein). “Furthermore, our nuclear stockpile is competing for limited defense spending, money that could be used to address more pressing challenges such as the fight against the Islamic State and defending against cyber attacks” (Feinstein). As Feinstein says, nuclear weapons are an unnecessary burden on the nation's wallet. Therefore, they need to start the process of disarmament to make room for a better solution. Another key thing to remember is that the United States is already well over 18 trillion dollars in debt and…

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    “When we fail to pursue peace, then it stays forever beyond our grasp. That's where human progress ends.”…

    • 2398 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    "Father Stephen said that peace is a state of mind. We will never have world peace, John, so we have to be peaceful within ourselves and that will make us happy." (p134)…

    • 887 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    “Peace is the work of justice indirectly, in so far as justice removes the obstacles to peace; but it is the work of charity directly, since charity, according to its very notion, causes peace.”…

    • 3248 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    A fundamental component of the proliferation debate revolves around the perceived or alleged efficiency of nuclear deterrence. Proliferation optimists argue that, “more may be better” because nuclear weapons increase the cost of nuclear conflict, ultimately deterring states from engaging in nuclear warfare with a nuclear-armed state (Suzuki 2015). Optimists argue that nuclear deterrence works reliably, thus there seemingly less to be feared from nuclear proliferation and beneficial to a state to…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Georges Clemenceau once said “war is too important to be left to the generals.” In Dr. Strangelove, Col. Ripper remarks that now “war is too important to be left to the politicians. They have neither the time, the training, nor the inclination for strategic thought” but Kubrick’s message implies that war is too important to be left to anybody at all. So with the persistence of nuclear technology as weapons of mass destruction, the question arises: Do we, as decision-makers, have the restraint not to use such weapons on one another? The question remains unanswered, but if there is to be peace, we must remain cautious and aware of their implications. Nuclear technology gives humanity an incredible opportunity to move forward, but if misused, it could send all life on earth back to the stone…

    • 1243 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    “I refuse to accept the view that mankind is so tragically bound to the starless midnight of racism and war that the bright daybreak of peace and brotherhood can never become a reality... I believe that unarmed truth and unconditional love will have the final word.” (Martin Luther King, Jr)…

    • 1230 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Even if you pay all this money trying to help the nation, it can negatively affect the treasury and make things worse”.This evidence supports the thesis because It is a waste of money and is so much trouble , it can cost a political criticism.Lastly nuclear weapons cost millions and makes poorer nations invest because of the cost and maintenance.It is not a good…

    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Pro nuclear war

    • 1607 Words
    • 7 Pages

    “Everyone in the world is threatened by the existence of nuclear weapons. Has anyone the right to wield such destructive power?” (Morality of Nuclear Deterrent) Many people in the United States disagree on whether the United States should keep nuclear weapons. Mainly because of the moral factor. Yes, it is dangerous for countries to own such a powerful figure that threatens millions of people around the world, but the world is trapped by this idea of possible idea of nuclear war that just about every country has on these weapons of mass destruction and will continue to make more to show dominance over the other countries who don’t have as much. The moral factor that is sure to be constantly brought up by many people about keeping our nuclear weapons will always be discussed since the greater damage these weapons cause. For example, when the United Stated bombed Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Yes it was tactically right decision and prevented imperialism from expanding, and preventing the cause of japan gaining complete dominance over the world had to be overlooked when coming into the moral play off of the all the people who were affected by this disaster to their country. These cities where quite larger, but not to big so there…

    • 1607 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The US propelled atomic weapons in the mornings of August sixth and August ninth of 1945 to Japan, producing a huge number of honest deads, without tallying the back ones caused by the radiation that was in the place. Atomic weapons are probably the most huge executing gadgets weapons that have ever existed. This weapon can burn people that are in the epicenter of the bomb and the spots encompassing it in not more than seconds. This weapon ought to be dispensed with from earth since it is a peril to the planet and people, a reality that is much more terrible than creating a few many years of "worldwide peace". Likewise, it is an unfeeling approach to murder a person, that is against to any sort of good esteem.…

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In conclusion, I can say that Nuclear weapons are the killing device. Because they can kill many lives, families and countries. They might be the symbol of power, but They are never worth it if you have to exchange with many lives. I can say that Nuclear Weapons are not global peacemakers, but a killing device is what they…

    • 276 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    On August 6, 1945 the United States dropped the first atomic bomb ever on the Japanese city of Hiroshima. They also dropped a second bomb three days later,which eventually ended World War ll. Was it the right thing to do? It created many controversial dilemmas on whether it was right or not. There are many people who oppose the use of the atomic bombs; though there are some that believe it was a necessity in ending the war. I think that there could have been other ways to end World War ll.…

    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    My partner and I stand in firm affirmation of the following resolution. Resolved: Unilateral military force by the united states is justified to prevent nuclear proliferation. I would like to share various definitions with you before I continue. According to the Merriam Webster dictionary, Justified-having done for, or marked with a good legitimate reason. Prevent-to hold keep back. Nuclear proliferation is the increase in number; multiply weapons that run and emite nuclear energy. Now, I will prove this assertion through the following contentions; The United States Government is obliged to protect its citizens and itself from threats of nuclear proliferation, The United States Government is best positioned to take military action, as well as Unilateral action is justified to assure maximum protection from terrorism and political inconsistent reigns.…

    • 1108 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    What Peace Means to Me…

    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages

    However, in today’s world, peace and harmony face various threats. Terrorism, regional imbalance, economic disparity, and social inequality are some of the factors which threaten peace today. We all are so engrossed in our busy lifestyles and yet want our lives to be peaceful. We expect that peace to be omnipresent but what we need to realize is the fact that if we want peace- we have to live peacefully, love everyone, forgive, forget, etc.…

    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays