Preview

nuclear weapon

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
403 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
nuclear weapon
IS226 Bismah Imtiaz 7A 11/27/13 Nuclear Weapons in Iran
Just after the signing ceremony in Geneva on Sunday, President Hassan Rouhani of Iran declared that the world had recognized his country’s “nuclear rights.” He was right. The deal will only lead Iran to be more stubborn.
Under the deal Iran is supposed to convert it’s nearly 200 kilograms of uranium enriched to 20 percent purity a short step away from bomb-grade material into material that cannot be used for a weapon. The agreement does not require Iran to reduce its stockpile of uranium enriched to 3.5 percent, not even by one gram. Transforming unprocessed uranium into 3.5 percent-enriched uranium accounts for more than two-thirds of the time needed to transform unprocessed uranium into weapons-grade material. And given the thousands of centrifuges Iran has, the regime can enrich its stock of low-level uranium to weapons-grade quality in a matter of months. Iran already has enough of this material to make four bombs.
The United States, at the direction of President Obama, has developed sophisticated weaponry specifically in order to deter Iran from going nuclear. But heaven forbid those should have to be used is the dominant feeling in Western capitals. As a result, greater U.S. military capabilities may have given the P5+1 more reason, rather than less, to strike a deal in Geneva. And while the Obama administration maintains that the military option is still on the table in case Iran does not comply with the new agreement, that threat is becoming less and less credible.
The six powers the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The U.S. and Iranian conflict started more than 60 years ago. It started when the U.S. and British intelligence agencies killed the Prime Minister of Iran. The U.S. then sought them for help almost 30 years later, by selling them weapons, but Iran had a plan of their own, America did not receive their help. In 2002, Bush declared Iran as an “axis of evil,” this angered Iran. That same year, it was revealed that Iran is developing nuclear facilities. During a phone call between the Presidents of the U.S. and Iran, the men expressed their desire to end the long running dispute between the two nations. They are still discussing ways on which to finish it.…

    • 335 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Rouhani? What is his goal? What does he pursue with his atomic program, and is it…

    • 1773 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Ahmadinejad is cautious with the Obama proposal. He sees the move as a public relations move by America to absolve them of any fault. This is to the extent that if Iran does not agree to Obama 's terms, then, America is justified in issuing stricter sanctions (Nick, 2009)…

    • 1678 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ki-Moon Pros And Cons

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Just recently, politicians in the United States praised the treaty with Iran, but the public found many issues with it. Such as, the twenty-four-hour warning on when they are to make "surprise visits" to the Iranian nuclear facilities (Brookhiser). Furthering the American and Iranian tension, Iran's greatest leaders are now struggling to approach how they are going to make a peace treaty with their great enemy. "We have announced that we will not negotiate with the Americans on any issue other than the nuclear case," Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, Iran’s supreme leader said, "prepare for the continuation of the fight against America” (Erdbrink). Iran announces that it will only make deals with the United States on nuclear weapons in the hope of it leading to a friendlier relationship between Iran and other countries…

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Bibliography: 1. Sanger, David E., Baker, Peter. “Obama Limits When U.S. Would Use Nuclear Arms”. The New York Times. The New York Times Company, April 5, 2010. Web. January 23, 2014.…

    • 1791 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Chief among those issues, for Iran, is its nuclear program. Iranian officials have insisted its aim is peaceful and for energy purposes only, but skeptical U.S., Israeli and other officials accuse Tehran of working to develop nuclear weapons. Iran 's…

    • 979 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Drone Strikes Iran

    • 102 Words
    • 1 Page

    terrorists. If Iran makes the nuclear it will increase terrorism by giving the terrorists a nuclear…

    • 102 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Political Cartoon Summary

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This political cartoon depicts the state of the Iran nuke deal and what people in our society feel about it at this time. The cartoon depicts how the Iran Deal is highly criticized by many republicans who feel that the administration does not care about what they are concerned about with the deal. The painter also depicts the feeling towards Iran…

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    iran nuclear deal

    • 1299 Words
    • 6 Pages

    summarized the deal as: "This deal means that we agree that it is necessary to…

    • 1299 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Two treaties put into effect over the past 20 years have set limits on the testing of nuclear weapons . The Limited Test Ban Treaty of 1963, which has been signed by more than 120 nations prohibits nuclear explosions in the atmosphere ,oceans and the space, allowing only them underground .The Thresh hold Test Ban Treaty of 1976, a bilateral agreement between the US and the USSR, prohibits underground tests of nuclear weapons with a yield greater than 150 kilotons. In the present climate of widespread pressure for more effective control of nuclear arms the idea of a comprehensive ban on all nuclear testing is receiving renewed attention.Such an agreement would be an important measure.It might inhibit the development of new weapons by the major nuclear powers, and it might also help to prevent the spread of nuclear weapons technology to other countries.…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Atom Bomb

    • 289 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The dropping of the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki remains among the most controversial events in modern history. Historians have actively debated whether the bombings were necessary. What effect they had on bringing the war in the Pacific to an end and what other options were available to the United States. As American policymakers struggled with how to use a powerful new technology and what the long-term impact of atomic weaponry might be, not just on the Japanese but on domestic politics and America’s international relations and the building of the Cold War with the Soviet Union. It is clear that the reasons for dropping the atomic bombs on Japan, with a variety of issues that went far beyond the simple goal of bringing World War II to an end. The atomic weapon was considered to be a new terrifying powerful explosive, as devastating as any other of the deadly explosive weapons of modern war. Had the war continued until the projected invasion on November 1, additional fire raids of B‑20’s would have been more destructive of life and property than the very limited number of atomic raids which we could have done in the same period. But the atomic bomb was more than a weapon of terrible destruction; it was a psychological weapon as well. The bomb served exactly the purpose we intended. The peace party was able to take the path of surrender and the whole weight of the Emperor’s prestige was in favor of peace. When the Emperor ordered surrender and the small but dangerous group of people who opposed him were brought under control, the Japanese became so controlled that the great undertaking and occupation and disarmament was completed with…

    • 289 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Atomic Bomb

    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages

    As a citizen from the U.S.A., I believe that we should not drop the bomb in Japan.The use of the bomb without warning is contrary to the position of the United States as a great humanitarian nation, especially since Japan seems close to surrender.More than 60 of its cities have been destroyed by conventional bombing, the home islands are being blockaded by the American Navy, and the Soviet Union entered the war by attacking Japanese troops in Manchuria. Even general Dwight Eisenhower said that the Japanese are soon to be surrender. A surprise use of the bomb would damage the respect that we have built up in the world community. It is morally wrong and will set a bad precedent in the future. Because such a weapon could lead to a proliferation of similar weapons that would threaten future generations. To use it now would be an international crime.The whole world will just become a nuclear world. We just ended a war with the most infamous Germans to fight for what we believed . If we drop the bomb, isn't it against our beliefs? Remember how France and Britain made the unfair treaty with Germans? A treaty that they believed would end all wars. However as history shows us , this is certainly not true because years later, the Germans rose again and this time brought a bigger war than the previous Great War. This is will certainly alarm us, because what if the Japanese follow in German footsteps and make a bigger war in the future? Not only that, but by dropping the bomb it also means that we see the Japanese as savages instead of humans. The Japanese are already defeated and ready to surrender. If the U.S.A. becomes the first to use this weapon, then we will have adopted the ethical standard of barbarians. Atomic weapons are similar to poison gas – both are barbaric.The U.S.A. should not shock the world with such a weapon.…

    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Atomic Bomb

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages

    When asked what the singular most important event in United States, a lot of different suggestions come to mind, raging from the invention of the iPhone to the Civil War. I believe that the most important event was the dropping of the bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki.…

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Iran Nuclear Agreement: Greenblatt has issued no definitive statement on the Iran nuclear agreement and most likely will support whatever Trump wants to do. Second, it does not appear that Iran will be part of his…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Within fourteen months of its initiation, in July 2015, negotiations between Austria and Iran was successfully concluded as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action was signed my Iran, the P5 + 1, the European Union and Kurz. In a press release, Kurz shared his satisfaction on the conclusion of the agreement and emphasised reinforcement of Austria as a place of dialogue (Europe Integration Foreign Affairs, 2015). Kurz shared his point of view regarding nuclear weapons: “The only way to guarantee that nuclear weapons will never be used again is through their total elimination, all states share the responsibility to prevent the use of nuclear…

    • 1111 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics