Preview

Nuclear Power Presentation(Disadvantage)

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
554 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Nuclear Power Presentation(Disadvantage)
And I will introduce the disadvantage of nuclear power. The high Invest Costs would be the first challenge to face, The construction cost of a nuclear reactor is high; according to various studies, the total cost of building and making a nuclear power plant operational ranges between $8-17 billion(which is about 5~11 billion pounds). It implies a huge amount of investment from the beginning to the end — how to handle nuclear waste, or ,more specifically, the Radioactive Waste.

Radioactive Waste is a by-products of the nuclear power station that can pollute the environment beyond repair ,as a well-known fact that it can cause fatal diseases, such as cancer, in the human population if not properly disposed of. Actually this is the main adverse effect on human after an accident of nuclear power.

The last point of the dark side is that when the power station meets an accident, such like what happened in 2011 in Japan, the Fukushima Nuclear Accident, is much more devastating than those in conventional energy plants. Despite being a much rarer occurrence, individual nuclear disasters are much more deadly than, say, fossil fuel disasters. The accident may destroy all the living things and buildings around and leave radioactive sources on the planet that continues to express a high level of radioactivity for a long term — Usually those contaminants will take over hundred years to decommissioned. In this case, things get worse, radioactive not only spread on the land but also into the ocean and made globalization pollution issues; the explosion triggered the temblors at the same time .

However, if we take a review of the official report of the Fukushima Nuclear Accident, which present by The National Diet of Japan in Sep 12 2012(page 16), we can find from the report this disaster has been defined as “A ‘manmade’ disaster”, the reasons is:

the organizational and regulatory systems that supported faulty rationales for decisions and actions: 1 The operator did

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Japanese population is very mad and worried over all the Nuclear Power Plants. Nowadays, 1 year after the Nuclear disaster in Fukushima, Japan closed down 52 of all 54 Nuclear Power Plants, 2 are still open.…

    • 567 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Eugene Robinson’s article, “No Fail-Safe Option,” he addresses that nuclear power is beginning to look like a “bargain with the devil” (Robinson 226). Robinson, a journalist for The Washington Post, aims his article at the Chernobyl disaster and the unlikeliness of the Fukushima crisis ending with the same result. Even though Japanese engineers struggle to keep the catastrophe from escalating even higher, Robinson says we cannot ignore the fact that nuclear fission is “inherently and uniquely toxic technology” (226). He points out that the “most powerful earthquake in Japan’s recorded history” began a declining chain of events, starting with system…

    • 342 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Over centuries humans have always continued to try and find new ways of converting one form of energy into one which humans can manipulate for their own use. One of the most recent forms of converting energy, which is gaining in popularity is nuclear energy. With 14 percent of the world using it today it is a viable alternative to burning fossil fuels. To give you a basic idea on how the process of converting energy works according to the Canadian Nuclear Association is as basic as, “splitting the uranium atom to generate the heat that is used to produce steam for the production of electricity”(www.cna.ca). However things do not always run so smoothly, and the leakage of the nuclear material could have devastating consequences to both the land and its inhabitants. One of the bigger well know events of this nature, came from the power plant Chernobyl. To put simply it is a plant that exploded releasing nuclear waste into the atmosphere. Although this is detrimental to the environment the significance behind this event is because of this accident, we have now learned from our mistakes and are taking more precautions so that history is not repeated. I will prove that history will not be repeated through some background knowledge of the plant, what happened during the meltdown and how it effected the land and inhabitants, and finally what insight we have gained from this event and its significance to history.…

    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nuclear powers biggest drawback is the radiation produced that requires large amounts of shielding in order to protect workers and the surrounding areas. When nuclear plants have meltdowns, the melting of…

    • 730 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Global nuclear power plants and its industry have been a high expense for government subsidies,tax credit, or any form of public support in favor of the industry. A half century later, we have noticed that nuclear power is, instead, too expensive to finance. The first generation of nuclear power plants proved so costly to build that half of them were abandoned during construction. In addition , huge cost overruns are discovered which were passed on to utility customers…

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Weapons proliferation: o Enrichment of reactor-­‐grade uranium can be weapons grade o Reprocessing more efficient but plutonium useful for nuclear weapons o Disposal pools and dry casks susceptible to attack 3.) Safety: once “glamorous reactors” now dreaded • Three-­‐Mile Island (1979 4.) Storage of radioactive wastes o Need to store and secure spent nuclear fuel for 10,000 to 250,000 years!…

    • 7330 Words
    • 249 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    labouring the Walmart way

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages

    As everyone knows, nuclear energy can release nuclear radiation which can kill human’s cells and serious radiation can cause death. Furthermore, radiation can result in genetic variation. Radiation also has nuclear residue. It is hard to clear, may be more than 50 years can disappear. Such as Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant, now is a ghost town, no one can live in there because of the radiation residue.…

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The initial construction cost of nuclear power plants is large. On top of this, when the power plants first have been built, people are left with the cost to enrich and process the nuclear fuel which also costs a lot of money. How much? Apply concrete details from your research (and cite it). Just think of how nuclear is wasteful too conversational 8 not only that but the people who work there at the plant. Nuclear energy is very costly. Generation electricity in nuclear reactors is cheaper than electricity generating from oil, gas, coal and not to talk of the renewable energy source 1 cite. Even though coal pollutes big time doesn’t mean it’s not double negative bad. Coal produces carbon dioxide which we 9 human produce as well. By using coal, it provides just what we need without paying overtime on building one of nuclear buildings which cost way more than a Coal factory.…

    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Nuclear energy leads to an unsafe, unstable and unclean environment. The producing of nuclear energy can lead to both good and bad things, but two thing that come with producing nuclear energy are the high dangers and expenses. Many risks and high dangers of producing nuclear energy are any where from health issues to major meltdowns of nuclear plants. Expenses of nuclear energy plants are very expensive to build and to sustain them through the years. Renewable energy is a safer option for the environment and the economy, with no chances of major melt downs and expenses.…

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nuclear power does not put out green house gasses, nuclear power does not pollute our water, and unlike some people believe nuclear power does not release toxic gasses into the air. Some people believe that it produces toxic gases into the air because they see the white clouds that come out of the top of the power plant cooling towers, but in fact those white clouds are actually just the water vapor that has been used to cool the systems, it is not toxic and therefore does not pollute the air. Nuclear energy uses either plutonium or uranium, depending on the type of the reactor. Nuclear reactors produce less waste than any other type of energy source. One pound of plutonium can produce the same amount of energy as 50,000 barrels of oil. The number of deaths caused by coal powered plants is about 24,000 a year. There were only 56 direct deaths caused by the Chernobyl reactor meltdown. Fukushima had no direct deaths, and the only other reported deaths were of the 3 men who were testing a portable reactor in Arco, Idaho. Arco was also the very first city in the world to be powered by nuclear…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Cited: Cohen, Aaron M. “Cost May Threaten Nuclear Power’s Future.” Futurist May 2009: 16. Academic Search Complete. Web. 2 Dec. 2009. <http://search.ebscohost.com/‌login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=37809130&site=ehost-live>.…

    • 2071 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    2. In “Small Recactors Make a Bid to Revive Nuclear Power”, the Obama Administration and the Energy Department are working on making America the leader in advanced nuclear technology and manufacturing (Biello 2012). They are considering switching the large reactors, which are currently the predominant technology, to small reactors, which will save money. These reactors would contain enough power to power more than 200,000 U.S. homes for a year (Biello 2012). This strategy will cause less nuclear waste and will increase safety issues as well. In another article, “Time to revive, not kill, the nuclear age”, it is stated that a world without nuclear power would be less secure. Neither fossil fuels nor renewable resources will be able to replace the 14 percent of global electricity generated by nuclear reactors (Financial Times 2011). This article sides with MacFarlane by saying the Chernobyl accident was bad, but since then things…

    • 1389 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fukushima Earthquake

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages

    An earthquake of a magnitude of 9.0 that occurred in Japan at 2:46 pm on Friday March 11, 2011 did a significant amount of damage in the region, as the following tsunami did even much more damage, flooding about 560 square kilometers resulting in a human death toll of about 19,000 and the destruction of coastal ports, towns and buildings (Fukushima Accident, 2016). Eleven reactors at four different nuclear power plants in the region were operating at the time and were all shut down when the earthquake struck, but one of the plants, the Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant showed signs of a problem on day five (Fukushima Accident, 2016). The reactors proved to overcome adverse conditions caused by the earthquake, but vulnerable to the tsunami. Unfortunately, three Tepco employees were killed directly by the earthquake and the tsunami (Fukushima Accident, 2016).…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout the world, countries are leaning towards nuclear energy due to the amount of energy it can produce with very little resources. This topic is worth investigating since energy is basically a must, now in the 21st century. It is now considered an essential to have energy in our lives to maintain our standards of living. We have gone to many different sources of energy other than nuclear energy such as coal, solar, wind, oil and more, but many of those energy source have flaws too. Some sources of energy will reach the peak of their production due to resources and will eventually fall, others pollute the environment just like nuclear energy and some just don’t produce enough energy for us to fully rely on them. Many countries needed a new source of energy since…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The problem of radioactive waste is still an unsolved one. The waste from nuclear energy is extremely dangerous and it has to be carefully looked after for several thousand years (10'000 years according to United States Environmental Protection Agency standards).…

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays