A synoptic review of the literature brings to the fore insights into the determinants of NPL across countries. A considered view is that banks’ lending policy could have crucial influence on nonperforming loans (Reddy, 2004). He critically examined various issues pertaining to terms of credit of Indian banks. In this context, it was viewed that ‘the element of power has no bearing on the illegal activity. A default is not entirely an irrational decision. Rather a defaulter takes into account probabilistic assessment of various costs and benefits of his decision’. Mohan (2003) conceptualized ‘lazy banking’ while critically reflecting on banks’ investment portfolio and lending policy. The Indian viewpoint alluding to the concepts of ‘credit culture’ owing to Reddy (2004) and ‘lazy banking’ owing to Mohan (2003a) has an international perspective since several studies in the banking literature agree that banks’ lending policy is a major driver of non-performing loans (McGoven, 1993, Christine 1995, Sergio, 1996, Bloem and Gorters, 2001). Furthermore, in the context of NPAs on account of priority sector lending, it was pointed out that the statistics may or may not confirm this.
There may be only a marginal difference in the NPAs of banks’ lending to priority sector and the bank’s lending to private corporate sector. Against this background, the study suggests that given the deficiencies in these areas, it is imperative that banks need to be guided by fairness based on economic and financial decisions rather than system of conventions, if reform has to serve the meaningful purpose. Experience shows that policies of liberalization, deregulation and enabling environment of comfortable liquidity at a reasonable price do not automatically translate themselves into enhanced credit flow. Although public sector banks have recorded improvements in profitability, efficiency (in terms of intermediation costs) and asset quality in the 1990s, they continue to have higher interest rate spreads but at the same time earn lower rates of return, reflecting higher operating costs (Mohan, 2004). Bhattacharya (2001) rightly points to the fact that in an increasing rate regime, quality borrowers would switch over to other avenues such as capital markets, internal accruals for their requirement of funds. Under such circumstances, banks would have no option but to dilute the quality of borrowers thereby increasing the probability of generation of NPAs. In another study, Mohan
(2003) observed that lending rates of banks have not come down as much as deposit rates and interest rates on Government bonds. While banks have reduced their prime lending rates (PLRs) to some extent and are also extending sub-PLR loans, effective lending rates continue to remain high. This development has adverse systemic implications, especially in a country like India where interest cost as a proportion of sales of corporate are much higher as compared to many emerging economies. The problem of NPAs is related to several internal and external factors confronting the borrowers (Muniappan, 2002). The internal factors are diversion of funds for expansion/ diversification/ modernization, taking up new projects, helping/promoting associate concerns, time/cost overruns during the project implementation stage, business (product, marketing, etc.) failure, inefficient management, strained labor relations, inappropriate technology/technical problems, product obsolescence, etc., while external factors are recession, non-payment in other countries, inputs/power shortage, price escalation, accidents and natural calamities.
In the Indian context, Rajaraman and Vasishtha (2002) in an empirical study provided an evidence of significant vicariate relationship between an operating inefficiency indicator and the problem loans of public sector banks. In a similar manner, largely from lenders’ perspective, Das and Ghosh (2003) empirically examined non-performing...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document