This characterization of the distinction is rough because a zoologist's definition of “tiger” should count as a real definition, even though it may fail to provide “the constitution of the insensible parts” of the tiger. Moreover, an account of the meaning of a word should count as a nominal definition, even though it may not take the Lockean form of setting out “the abstract idea to which the name is annexed.” Perhaps it is helpful to indicate the distinction between real and nominal definitions thus: to discover the real definition of a term X one needs to investigate the thing or things denoted by X; to discover the nominal definition, one needs to investigate the meaning and use of X. Whether the search for an answer to the Socratic question “What is virtue?” is a search for real definition or one for nominal definition depends upon one's conception of this particular philosophical activity. When we pursue the Socratic question, are we trying to gain a clearer view of our uses of the word ‘virtue’, or are we trying to give an account of an ideal that is to some extent independent of these uses? Under the former... [continues]
Cite This Essay
(2013, 09). Noting Details. StudyMode.com. Retrieved 09, 2013, from http://www.studymode.com/essays/Noting-Details-1933152.html
"Noting Details" StudyMode.com. 09 2013. 2013. 09 2013 <http://www.studymode.com/essays/Noting-Details-1933152.html>.
- MLA 7
"Noting Details." StudyMode.com. StudyMode.com, 09 2013. Web. 09 2013. <http://www.studymode.com/essays/Noting-Details-1933152.html>.
"Noting Details." StudyMode.com. 09, 2013. Accessed 09, 2013. http://www.studymode.com/essays/Noting-Details-1933152.html.