Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Norman England "Feudalism"

Good Essays
706 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Norman England "Feudalism"
LESSON SEVEN – NORMAN ENGLAND AFTER THE CONQUEST The reason why the Norman Conquest was so significant is that it changed the entire way England was run. It introduced a new set of rulers, a new ruling system, a new language and a new culture. FEUDALISM One of the most important changes was to do with the ownership of land. William introduced a system of land ownership that was called feudalism. Firstly, William seized by force the land belonging to important Anglo-Saxons and claimed it all as his own. However, it was hard for him, as one man at a time when transport was slow, to effectively control all of that land. So he gave land to important people who had helped him to conquer England. These people were called lords or barons. However, they didn’t truly ‘own’ the land. They were allowed to pass it down to their sons when they died, and they were allowed to farm it and build on it, but if they offended the king he could take it back off of them. On the left is a picture of Richard Fitzgilbert, one of William’s most important barons. William gave him most of Kent, and Richard built the castle of Tonbridge, which you can still see today. BARONS AND SERFS In return for getting this land, the barons promised to give their king a certain amount of military service. That is, they would go into battle with him in a foreign war, or they would protect a place in England for him for a certain amount of time per year. The barons would then run the land they had been given. They would allow

peasants to farm the land, but they would demand the peasants gave them a certain amount of the produce each year. They would also demand that peasants would serve in the army with them. The peasants were not quite slaves. Their barons didn’t own them in the way that Roman slave owners owned slaves. They couldn’t buy and sell the peasants, and they couldn’t kill them. But they could, and did, forbid the peasants to leave the land. In effect, these peasants were ‘tied’ to the land. If their lord of the manor changed, they stayed on the land. These sorts of peasants were called serfs, or villeins. THE PYRAMID STRUCTURE As you can see from this, feudal societies were organised a bit like a pyramid. At the top was just one man – the King. Beneath him came a small number of barons. And then beneath them came a very large number of serfs. You might also have realised that in this society, land was the most important thing. The more land you had, the more important and powerful you were. Money didn’t matter nearly as much as it does nowadays. As well as this, towns and cities were much less important. Most of Britain was made up of farms and countryside, and there were very few towns. However, towns were outside the laws of feudalism. If a serf ran away from his lord’s land and escaped to a town, then if he remained there without being captured for a year and a day, he would be free for life. The feudal system was at its peak in the 11th and 12th centuries. When it did start to become less important, it was because money, towns and cities started to become more important – and they were all outside the feudal system.

LESSON SEVEN – NORMAN ENGLAND. QUESTIONS. Answer these questions in full sentences! 1. What was the word for the system of land ownership William introduced?

2. What did William do to land that belonged to Anglo-Saxons?

3. What was the name of William’s most important supporters?

4. What did he give them as a reward for supporting him?

5. What did the barons have to give him in return?

6. What two things did the peasants have to give the barons?

7. What are the two words for a peasant in the feudal system?

8. What shape best describes the organisation of society at this time?

9. What parts of Britain were not organised by feudalism?

10. When was the feudal system at its peak?

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    1. Do you think the characteristics of feudalism help explain the later success of Western & Japanese societies?…

    • 1275 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Henry was using his meaningful speech that arises from his spirit to convey more trust to his followers. This speech was a good example to show how Henry and all other strong feudal rulers in this era used their strength and unique personalities to amaze and persuade but not to force their people to become their followers. The unique and the highly effective speech and the thoughts of Henry v shows how open were individuals in Elizabethan era about expressing themselves to reveal social or political viewpoints.…

    • 87 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    1. Make a LIST of the members of the feudal hierarchy. You can omit the church for now as we will look at that in later…

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In medieval Europe, country life was governed by a system call “feudalism.” In a feudal society, the king gave large pieces of land called fiefs to noblemen and bishops. Peasants without land were known as serfs, they did most of the work on the fiefs: They planted and harvested crops and gave most of the produce to the landowner. In exchange for their labor, they were allowed to live on the land.…

    • 1526 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    A big part of his takeover was the building of castles; an entirely new building to England. There were mixed opinions about this, as it had previously been a law that no building was to be taller than the Church. Castles were a very good way for the Normans to expand their grip on the English people. The English population outnumbered the Normans, and the Normans had to make sure they had some control over the English. Castles were a sign of Norman power and might. They could be easily seen and quickly spread fear among the English. The castles warned the English that Norman soldiers lived in these castles and that any attempts to attack them would be met with battles. The castles also gave the Norman soldiers a safe place to live. They were, after all, quite new to…

    • 895 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    (AGG) Fighting for the welfare of their kingdom, knights have always been feared by their enemies. (BS-1) The training to become a knight and all the other activities he engaged in were very hard and required a lot of training. (BS-2) Feudalism and manorialism benefited knights, by giving them food and land in return for loyalty and protection. (BS-3) Feudalism also enabled the kingdom to build a functioning military. (BS-4) Lastly the church adapted and used the great chain of being to their advantage. (TS) Knight would affect feudalism by giving protection to the kingdom in exchange for food and land.…

    • 2289 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    William was confronted by problems that no previous ruler had to face. The kingdom of England and William’s posseisions in Northern France were seperated by a wide expase of sea. William had to work hard to establish order in all his lands and by 1086 this was largely achieved. The Normans used many means to esatblish their kingdom in 1066. Many of these techniques included crushing the opposition. The Normans used various different techniques to establish their kingdom, of which many were quite succesful.…

    • 1009 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Asdfghji

    • 1258 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Feudalism - Nobles were given land owned by the king in exchange for loyalty and military services.…

    • 1258 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    His childhood experiences taught him not only had to learn how to defend his keep, but when to take calculated risks, when to retreat, when to take advantage of an opportunity, and the importance of securing strong alliances. All these factors, among others, led him to eventually and successfully conquer England. The Norman invasion of England, led by William the Conqueror, is remembered in history as one the greatest invasion in Western Europe and William’s greatest achievement. The introduction of the feudal system, common law, and the French and Norman language, made by William, led to the eventual development of Parliament and the present day English language, legal system, and basic rights. As a result of Norman architecture, brought by William, today we have many of these castles and cathedrals, one famous being the White Tower, in London, which was actually begun by William the Conqueror. He also made changes in the church with new reform and administrations. Another legacy left by William the conqueror is that today the current monarchs of England can trace their ancestry back to him. As all these innovation in law, government, architecture, church and language got passed down through the years they progressed and eventually, when England became a great power and began to expand, they spread to different countries and colonies. The blending and combining of Anglo-Saxon and Norman institutions started by William the Conqueror strengthen and created a New England that would eventually became, and still is, one of the most powerful nation in the…

    • 950 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this span of forty years, Normandy individualized itself from the Franks. His focus on the political structure and its role in legitimizing Normand power proved successful. In the latter part of 960’s, Richard changed the ideological strategy of the court to appeal to incoming warriors which reinvented the Duchy of Normandy. The failures of his predecessors provided Richard I with the knowledge to solidify his families rule. The model of political structure Rollo and William Longsword made their courts less unified with more individually concerned earls. By promoting a sense of Norman identity, it would help provide a chance for…

    • 1281 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Serfs were not slaves but were a very poor group of people. Serfs worked on farms owned by noble men. They usually lived on the nobles farm on which they worked on and stayed in a small hut. Serfs had to pay tribute to the noble man that owned the farm. If serfs did not do this they would be punished by becoming slaves. Serfs gave noble men most of their crops and keep a small amount for themselves.If certain crimes were committed in the empire the person committing the crime would then become a slave. People would also become slaves if they were prisoners of war and were not sacrificed. Any person in the Aztec empire could become a slave or make their children slaves. People did this to pay off debt or as a tribute. Slaves had a lot of rights such as having children, being able to get married, marry their owner, and they could by their freedom back. Most slaves became free once there owner died. If a slave had a child while being a slave that child was did not become a slave but was a free man or…

    • 907 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After the roman empire, In Western and Eastern Europe, land holding elites made use of peasant labor as well on self efficient manors. Many free peasants became serfs. They had personal freedom but could not leave the land. In Eastern territories. such as Russia, a lot of grain was grown here. This required a large and dependable labor force. Peasants used to be able to move between different estates but now could not. The estates became so large they needed protection. The Zar said that the estates had to serve them just as the serfs had to serve the estates. By the end of the 1600s serfdom was changed over to slavery wehre a worker could be bought or sold.…

    • 676 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Medieval Europe

    • 535 Words
    • 3 Pages

    After the Roman Empire fell, trade across the Mediterranean diminished and people began to rely on the meager resources of the area in which they lived (Bulliet 246). In all of Western Europe, self-sufficient farming communities, manors, were established (Bulliet 246) as the people moved away from the urban-based civilization that defined the Roman Empire. Peasants, or serfs, would work for the lord of the manor who would shelter them from attack. The serfs could be treated as cruelly or as humanely as the master wanted, with few laws enforced (Doc. 4, Harsh Treatment of Serfs and Slaves). This practice was established because of the instability of the region and the possibility of warfare. The resultant feudal society shaped the region for the next few hundred years. Feudalism involved the serfs submitting to a vassal, the noble who owned the manor. The noble was given the manor by the king. In exchange for the land, known as a fief, the vassal promised to give military support to the king. The fiefs were like small villages with the lord of the manor providing governance and justice (Bulliet 247). This system helped to hold Europe together during this time of uncertainty. The self sufficiency of the region helped to shape this era of history, providing a sense of stability to the region that would continue until it was conquered by…

    • 535 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1066 - Essay

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages

    After his coronation as king of England, William introduced the feudal system. Indeed, ruling both English kingdom and Duchy of Normandy, William couldn’t make it himself, especially when he had to return to Normandy to maintain his control over the land. That’s why he divided up England into very large plots of lands, which were given to the noblemen who had fought bravely for him in battle. In terms of the Feudal system, these noblemen were called tenants-in-chief. To grant these lands to his…

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The period 11th -12th centuries saw the Normans spread out hither and thither to many parts of the world, different lands and countries. Not like the conquest of England or other invasions, the Normans’ conquest of southern Italy and Sicily shows more ‘Norman Achievements’ compared with other conquests that time. Southern Italy and Sicily were divided land for complex political and religious groups. However, under the rule of Normans, the cultural syncretic of Southern Italy and Sicily was never so apparent . This essay argues how did the Normans deal with different ethnic and religious groups in southern Italy and Sicily?…

    • 902 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays