Preview

No Child Left Behind Theory Application

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2653 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
No Child Left Behind Theory Application
Analysis and history of the legislation
The No Child Left Behind Act has impacted several schools who are currently receiving funds from Title 1. The purpose of The No Child Left Behind Act has worked to help primary and secondary schools throughout the states help improve the academic standings of students and faculties. Primarily, the subjects that have been targeted are reading and math. In my view, this legislation works to help improve the test scores and proficiency statuses of these topics in order to help improve the academic development of given students. The No Child Left Behind Act supports the different academic standard-based education reforms that are based on the premise that setting high standards and establishing measurable goals can improve individual outcomes in education.
The No Child Left Behind Act requires states to develop assessments in basic skills. To receive federal school funding, States must give these assessments to all students at select grade levels. The Act does not assert a national achievement standard. Each individual state develops its own standards. The No Child Left Behind Act expanded the federal role in public education through annual testing, annual academic progress, report cards, teacher qualifications, and funding changes. This legislation has established regulated and mandatory tests and analytical tests to regulate the proficiency status of schools. This Act has worked to give students academic extracurricular activities to improve the academic levels of students. There are programs within the educational classrooms to help establish set levels of learning. Some topics that concern the creators and mandating goals of this act are the decrease scores and proficiency levels of schools and districts. If a student or school falls below previous test scores then reformation and government “takeover” may be enacted to alternate and reconstruct the academic structure of the schools. The No Child Left Behind Act



References: Bast, J. L. (2001). How Do We Change Public Policy? (Master 's thesis). April. Retrieved March 11, 2014, from http://explorersfoundation.org/archive/88t1.pdf Federal Education Budget Project (2013). Background & Analysis. Retrieved from http://febp.newamerica.net/background-analysis/no-child-left-behind-funding

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The No Child Left Behind act has its pros and cons when it comes to the five core principles including strong accountability, expanded flexibility and control, methods based on scientific research, expanded options for parents, and highly qualified teachers. The pros and cons of the say this because when teaching diverse learners they are dealing with a variety of different learning styles. In turn every student will not respond to the No Child Left Behind principles or methods in the same manner, meaning that it may work for some while it may not work for others. The idea of strong accountability it is relevant to the teachers and the students. The teachers they are held accountable due to the set standards and curriculums that they have to teach and follow in order to meet the goals of the NCLB. Along with this they have to prepare the student for the standardized tests that are put in place to measure the students and the teacher’s progress. This is tricky because if the student fails teachers are held accountable while the students are also held responsible for themselves if they fail. This is when highly qualified teachers cone into effect due to the evaluations of their teaching through how the students perform on the standardized tests. In some ways this may be a good thing, but it can also be really bad too. If the students do good then the teachers look highly qualified but if the students don’t do a good job then the teachers look unqualified or as if they are not meeting the standards when that really may not be the case at all. Although teachers have certain curriculums to follow, they do have expanded flexibility and control regarding tailoring their lesson plans which is a good thing that gives them a little freedom. On the other hand it has its cons too because that in my opinion is about the only leeway that they have to make things their own. This will affect the students because teachers are stuck…

    • 689 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    pink dear mr president

    • 368 Words
    • 2 Pages

    -This refers to President Bush's widely debated "No Child Left Behind" program, in which federal funding for schools is contingent on standardized test scores. The program has been praised by supporters for its aim to raise the bar for teachers and push for continued education, as well as its basis in literacy support and individual school accountability. It has also been berated for creating a narrow curriculum because of limited focus of the standardized tests, inadequate funding, allegations of test score manipulation and its clause to guarantee the facilitation of military recruitment during introductions to higher education.…

    • 368 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The population of English Language Learners has made a tremendous growth in American, over the past few years the English Language Learners has grown more the twenty percent and is predictable to increase more with time. With the population growing in our educational system modifications had to be made. The laws specifies that all children who are disabled, don’t speak English, or disadvantaged still have an equal right to an education. For the reason of English Language Learner comprehensive span the United States wanted something that could adjust and help as a wide range obligation and or standard required to applied in the educational system, so with the No Child Left behind act allowed it to be done. Since the states have to follow and stand by assessment guidelines as well as academic standards with the No Child Left Behind act people ask exactly how the non- English students would fit into this law. Assessment must also be given with unlimited probability that a student will pass in the regular education curriculums, even though they definitely let each state establish their own specific procedures that met with these…

    • 1034 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Nclb Act Pros And Cons

    • 1781 Words
    • 8 Pages

    On January 8, 2002, former president George W. Bush signed the No Child Left Behind Act, which attempted to improve school’s test scores and accountability. The Act set out to improve education. With the decline in test scores and the racial discrimination in schools, it was time for a change. The change came through the NCLB Act when it tried to fix the issues in schools and make a positive impact for the children. Even though under the NCLB Act some goals were met, overall, the act was not effective in teaching other subjects other than the subjects required, instilling character in our students, and maintaining the consistency of the standards for passing.…

    • 1781 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) was signed into law in January, 2002 by President George W. Bush. On the surface, because of bipartisan support, the act brought about, for the first time, surveillance measures to ensure that all school-aged children would receive a free, quality, public education. When researched historically we see the pattern that has emerged through policy and politics that has brought about NCLB. As a result of the acceptance of NCLB, we have created a way of viewing success in education by standardized testing, a monster in and of itself in it’s cost and ability to quantify the successful components of a good liberal education. It is necessary to understand how the Act came about, how it is being implemented, and the problems that have ensued to gain a good perspective about the philosophy and policies of the NCLB.…

    • 1041 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Nclb Pros And Cons

    • 1526 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In January 2002 congress, with the encouragement of President Bush, passed a new act that was intended to prevent children from being left behind in education. No Child Left Behind is designed to change the culture of America 's schools by closing the achievement gap, offering more flexibility, giving parents more options, and teaching students based on what works. This was and is a great idea. Children are our future and we need to make sure they get all the opportunities education can give them. The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001(NCLB) is a well intentioned yet fundamentally flawed piece of legislation.…

    • 1526 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    “A hopeful America is one in which not one child is left behind.” This quote from President George W. Bush at a recent news conference represents the current philosophy of our government on education. In 2001 President Bush signed the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB). The new law is an updated version of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) which was signed into law in 1965. Since then standardized testing has been a part of our school system in one form or another, yet there is little evidence that these tests have improved children’s learning through the years.…

    • 1969 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nclb Thesis

    • 1474 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The United States educational system is preforming poorly compared to the rest of the world: America is ranked 17th in educational performance, 25th in Math, 17th in Science, and 14th in Reading skills. Disabled, minority, and underprivileged children are lacking the adequate resources to succeed in our school system. No Child Left Behind (NCLB) was a revised version of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (EASA) proposed by former President George Bush in 2001. The intent was to reform the educational system so American’s schools could have the opportunity to thrive domestically and internationally, grant children equality of opportunity, and boost students K-12 level of understanding in core subjects, such as science, technology, and math. This initiative sought to improve our lagging educational system in the U.S to inch closer to higher achieving educational standards, such as the United Kingdom. However, No Child Left Act is hindering children’s chance of a “healthy start, a head start, a fair start, a safe start, and a moral start in life,” by amplifying undesired pressure on students through standardized testing, increasing federal jurisdiction within schools, and minimizing the roles of additional core subjects, such as social studies and foreign languages. This…

    • 1474 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When it comes to the children of America’s education, every child depends upon the accountability of their family, educators and the government. When President George W. Bush was in office, he expressed that “Too many of our neediest children are being left behind”. President Bush proposed the legislation of No Child Left Behind Act of 2001(NCLB) on January 8, 2002, to improve the quality of life and education for our nation. The No Child Left Behind Act was one of the more favorable and focused policy problems, shortly after the September 11th, attack. As it is understood, the government strongly believed that it was a necessity to continue to improve education now more than ever. The policy process was a pluralistic approach along with…

    • 223 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Nclb Argument

    • 2683 Words
    • 11 Pages

    When children come home from school, parents usually sit down with them, go through their homework folders and ask their child, “so, what did you learn at school today?” Twenty years ago, the child may have commented on what they learned in art, music, social studies or geography. Now, a child will comment only on what they learned in their reading circle or in their math book. The fault for this lies within the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act. Standardized testing has turned teachers into test proctors and schools into testing facilities. Students are no longer receiving a broad education that covers many subjects; instead, their learning is streamlined to fit the content that is on the standardized tests. The NCLB Act is not working as it was intended, and as a result the American children are falling even further behind other developed nations. In fact, American students are ranked 19th out of 21 countries in math, 16th in science and last in physics (DeWeese 2). The No Child Left Behind Act needs to be tossed out before we do irreversible damage to the education system. It is not too late – we can turn everything around by getting rid of costly standardized tests, ensure students receive a broad education that includes classes in arts and music, which will better prepare them for higher education, and give control back to the individual states.…

    • 2683 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    High School and Act

    • 1525 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Lets first start by explaining what the Act entails. As defined by Wikipedia, The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (Public Law 107-110), more commonly known as NCLB, is a United States federal law signed on January 8, 2002 by George Bush, that reauthorizes a number of federal programs that aim to improve the performance of primary and secondary schools by increasing the standards of accountability for state, school districts and schools, as well as providing parents more flexibility in choosing which schools their children will attend. NCLB is built on four principles: accountability for results, more choices for parents, greater local control and flexibility, and an emphasis on doing what works based on scientific research. Additionally, it promotes an increased focus on reading and re-authorizes the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (ESEA). NCLB is the latest federal legislation which enact the theories of standards-based education reform, which is based on the belief that high expectations and setting of goals will result in success for all students. Under the new law, every racial and demographic group in each school must meet rising goals on English and math tests to make "adequate yearly progress." This Act tests reading and math skills of…

    • 1525 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    No Child Left Behind Act

    • 386 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In Texas, this law has severely been impacted by a variety of teachers who are not highly qualified to educate these students and schools that are need in of drastic educational improvements at the moment. From the beginning, Texas has served has a representation for several of the requirements listed in the NCLB act because schools were already enforcing testing and accountability provisions. However, disagreements between Texas' statutory testing and accountability systems and the new federal requirements have produced uncertainty and led to problems in the execution of key provisions of NCLB. Alterations in the provisions of Texas' testing and accountability were made to meet the provisions of the NCLB act. One of the provisions here in Texas is that most students now take the Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills (TAKS) in replacement of the Texas Assessment of Academic Skills (TAAS). As for teachers, they are required to meet the definition of highly qualified, which means they must hold at least a bachelor's degree, have…

    • 386 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    No Child Left Behind

    • 5087 Words
    • 21 Pages

    The purpose of No Child Left Behind is to close the achievement gap and to make sure that all children learn their math and reading by 2014. The law tries to accomplish this hefty goal by implementing different tactics. One of them is to have stronger accountability in the schools. In order to achieve this goal they use standardized tests to see how well the schools are teaching all of the students, with specific emphasis on students who are disadvantaged, like poor students or minority students. They divide the students into subgroups according their ethnic backgrounds and wealth and give them the tests. The tests are supposed to show how well the students are doing learning their basic skills such as math and reading. In theory, the school can then identify those students who are falling behind and focus more attention and resources on them. The schools then test the students again in order to determine if there was any improvement in their basic skills. If there is no improvement in two years the school system must provide other alternatives for the children. For example, the school system must pay for the…

    • 5087 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Public Policy Research

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In 2001 when No Child Left Behind took effect it sparked the desire to use assessments to measures and to improve student learning. In the beginning these assessments focused on state tests, and found that results were not sufficient to identify students that were not keeping with up with fellow students. No Child Left Behind is a great theory, but in a realistic approach to the problem. We need give our government credit for taking bold steps to try to help our public schools, but need to realize the damages of No Child Left Behind are still being felt.…

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Common Core Standards

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Today the federal government has taken a role as a promoter of educational opportunity to students with numerous disadvantages. These disadvantages range from poverty to discrimination based on race and sex, to special education needs or even language barriers (Umpstead, 2008). Funds are supplied by the federal government for specific programs to improve educational quality; however, there may not be enough funds to cover all that is needed to make improvements. This is the controversial debate over the No Child Left Behind Act (2001). This act assisted in setting priorities when it came to education, but the accountability measures made it difficult to “use assessments as levers for good practices” (Phillips & Wong, p.38). The Common Core Standards, developed by the education team at the Bill and Melinda Gates foundation, is an education initiative that follows the basis of standards-based education. The purpose is to provide a clear and consistent understanding of what students are expected to learn. College ready is the goal. With this, parents and teachers know exactly what they need to do to help students succeed. It will allow states to work from the same core and share with one another not only what works, but also how best to teach the core.…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays