Indeed, New England and the Chesapeake regions both had settlers of English descent; by the 1700's the developments of these sodalities had sculptured them into two distinct societies.
The premier reason for the differentiation of the evolvement was primarily due to the motives for the foundations of these regions. The Virginia Company of London received a charter from King James I of England to establish Jamestown in 1607 in the New World as a profit-making venture. Like most joint stock companies, the Virginia Company was designed to last for a few years dedicated to the proposition that all stockholders should receive dividends adequate for their investments. Conversely, New England's motives for its foundation arose for religious purposes, During the Protestant Reformation in England, Puritans driven by reforms of John Calvin, Calvinism, broke their ties with the Roman Catholic Church and formed the Church of England endowed in English Christianity. King James I later harassed extreme Puritans, Separatists, because he feared defiance as their political leader. Furthermore in fear of persecution they fled to Holland where eventually after ensuing years of poverty and "Dutchification" of their children Separatists negotiated a deal with Virginia Co. to travel to the New World. These extremists referred to themselves as the "Purest of Puritans", and the later Puritans who came about in the 1630's Great Migration wanted to establish a "city upon a hill" as James Winthrop mentioned. (Document A)
Secondly, both the regions ultimately prospered because of economical and social patterns, but the aspects in which they were successful differed. Complete stable families settled in New England, in contrast to the Chesapeake. Ships bound for New England were husbandmen in their thirties and forties with a skilled profession. These strong family structures allowed a since of responsibility to emerge therefore men felt obligated to take care of their families and...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document