Nature vs. Nurture Argument
Nature versus Nurture, this statement has caused a lot of controversy, whether it is genes or environmental influence and effects of personality development (behavior, intelligence, and ability). Scientists have questioned this argument for hundreds of years, whether our development is in fact born or made. Some believe that it is only our genes; others believe it’s the environment, and others believe it is both, our genes and the environment. Either way this debate will continue for years to come.
MY THOUGHTS ON THE NATURE vs. NURTURE ARGUMENT
Ephesians 2:3 among whom also we all had our conversation in times past in the lusts of our flesh, fulfilling the desires of the flesh and of the mind; and were by NATURE the children of wrath, even as others. We are all born sinners and nothing can change that. The world around us is full of sin, and being born into sin we learn sinful things. We all have a sinful nature, and the only way to change this is to accept Christ into our lives and become Christians. Even after becoming a follower of Christ it is still in our nature to sin. But our heavenly father can and will convict us of any wrong doing.
Ephesians 6:4And, ye fathers, provoke not your children to wrath: but bring them up in the NURTURE and admonition of the Lord. This scripture tells us not to bring our children up in a worldly manner but to bring them up in a GODLY manner. Provoking a child to wrath would be a destiny of sinfulness.
WHAT IS THE HISTORY OF NATURE vs. NUTURE?
The history of this debate began with philosophers such as; John Locke and Jean Jacques Rousseau (Feldman, 1997). Locke believed that human behavior is influenced by only nurture. Meaning that humans are born with empty brains and began to learn and grow through their life experiences (Myers, 2000). Jean Jacques Rousseau believed that human development was genetic meaning that human behavior is developed the moment they are born (Feldman,...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document