Nature or Nurture: Which is More Important?
The debate about which is more important nature or nurture will go on forever. Is the genetic background the predetermine factor for a child's path through life or is it the environment in which a child is raised in the larger more important part of the growing cycle? A child is born with many traits that are carried throughout life however, this does not complete the full cycle of life. A child needs nurture in order to complete this cycle. Therefore, it is clear that the environment in which a child lives and attends school, along with the time spent at home with caring parents plays a major role in this cycle.
When a person wants to grow a plant she would need to start with a seed. Roger Funk states, "Nature (genetics) determines the potential of an individual tree, and Nurture (the conditions under which it is growing) determines the expression of this potential" (Funk 1). For example, a seed is considered a child's DNA, which alone will not produce anything unless other needs are met, this is called the nurturing part of the cycle. In order for a seed to grow it needs fertile soil, water and fertilizer. The fertile soil is considered the child's home with loving and attentive parents, while water is considered to be the child's siblings and extended family members. Finally, the fertilizer comes from interactions that a child has in school with teachers and other students. Jay Stipes states,
"While genetics are important, a tree needs good nutrition, good soil and adequate water to become a champion (Stipes 2).
A person who follows the nature stance believes that the genetic code is passed on to a child through height, weight and eye color. If a child had the opportunity to select his or her parents, a child could make sure that he or she selects the best ones for her life (Stipes2). This person also believes that not only are physical traits passed on but...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document