Preview

Nature of Humans

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1651 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Nature of Humans
ANT203Y1 Lecture # January 28th, 2014
Quiz #2; 6:10-7; in class; 15% of final grade; cover ch 8-11 and tutorial worksheets 9-11
40 questions llong, multiple choice, true or false and matching
Bring a pencil for scantron ;)
Film 'becoming human' at 7:10 - 8:00pm
Lecture
Who were the earliest hominins??
Pre-australapiths; 6-7 - 4.4 mya
Very primitive; little known about them; debatable they're even hominins
Earliest ones are sahelanthropus tchadensis; found in chad in 2001; earliest known hominin; classification debatable; 6-7mya; likely lived in multiple environments (mosaic)
No post cranial remains found for this species
Small brain about 320-380 cubic centimetres, like a modern chimp
Lsrge supraorbital torus, or brow ridges,
Unlike apes, they had a flatter or orthognathic face and small canines
Lacked a sectorial premolar or honing complex, a characteristic of apes and old world monkeys, shearing tooth
Orthognathic face, small canines and no sectorial premolar are derived traits
More anteriorly positioned foramen magnum suggesting that sahelanthropus was bipedal, but there are no post cranial bones to prove this
They could possibly be the last common ancestor between us and chimps, which is significant
Orrorin tugenensis
Discovered in tugen hills, kenya
Dates to 6mya, around the same time as sahelanthropus
Woodland environment
Only found small bits of post cranium and some teeth and mandible bones
Probably the size of a chimp, which is common for this time period
Small postcanines relative to body size, may suggest direct relation to humans
Microdont, in contrast to later hominins who had relatively large canines or were megadont
Thick enamel similar to humans, but unlike modern apes, this is a derived feature
This also suggests they were probably eating harder food, as thicker enamel is an indication of diet
Ape-like canines, pretty sure this species did not have a sectorial premolar
Post cranial remains suggest orrorin was a

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Week Seven Notes: The Stepsirhines: Lemurs and Lorises Prosimians(Same thing as Stepsirhines): Lemurs, Lorises, Tarsiers: Most primitive of the primates Exhibit the fewest derived traits (as a group) of all primates Ancestral Characteristics (ie. Inherited from mammals) • Rely more on olfaction • Moist noise and long snout • Eyes slightly more lateral Classification of Prosimians: Lemurs, Lorises, and Tarsiers Order- primates Suborder: Strepsirhines (used to be Prosimians)…

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hassan's Story

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The skeletal structures that are found inside the nasal cavity that might be missing from an excavated skull are:…

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The vital clue that the "Toumai" fossil is bipedal is how the skull connects to the spine. Researcher Michele could confer that by the shape of Toumai's skull. If the skull is placed on a neck of an ape that walks on all fours its eyes point down ward (not correct). If the skull is placed on an upright spine of a biped its eyes point straight ahead; for Michele this proved that Toumai walked upright.…

    • 957 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Lab Write Up

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The tooth formula is a shorthand technique that biologist use to keep track of the teeth on a particular jaw. The formula consisted of two lines, top jaw and bottom jaw, which were used to count how many incisors, canines, premolars, and molar teeth a species had. Species A, Odocoileus virginiaus (white-tailed deer), had a tooth formula of 0033/3133. On the top jaw, the deer had zero incisor and canine teeth but have three of both the premolars and molars. On the bottom jaw, the deer had three incisors, one canine, three premolars, and three molars. Species B, Canis latrans (coyote), had a tooth formula of 3142/3143. On the top jaw, the coyote had three incisors, one canine, four premolars, and two molars. On the bottom jaw, the coyote has three incisors, one canine, four premolars, and three molars. Both the deer and coyote skull were long and skinny towards the nose and mouth. The coyote skull had a much rounder nose than the deer. Species C, Homo sapiens (human), had a tooth formula of 2122/2122. On both the top and bottom jaws, there were two incisors, one canine, two premolars, and two molars. In comparison to the deer and coyote skull, the human was an outcast. The human skull was a short distance from the back of the skull to the front. The human skull was very different in bone structure and longer in height than the deer and coyote skulls.…

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sahelanthropus tchadensis has a skull with an elongated shape with a relatively short, vertical face, which is set high relative to the skull vault. The eyes are set far apart from each other and have a very large continuous bony brow ridge above them. Examination of the lower jaw reveals that Sahelanthropus had a total of thirty two teeth, which is common in all Old World monkeys, apes, and humans. The foramen magnum (where the skull opens for spinal cord passage) is positioned forward and oriented downward. Sahelanthropus has a nose opening that a midline reaches down to the bony palate, as seen in gibbons and monkeys. By contrast, humans and African apes have a nose opening that is set well above the mouth even at its midline.…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    bio asesmnet unit 2

    • 657 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Which of the following species, in the human evolutionary line, are believed to have been bipedal…

    • 657 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    7 million '' 10,000 B.C.E. |Fossil remains of near-human or proto-human creature known as Hominids…

    • 1559 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Bruce Bowers article, “Fossils hint at India’s crucial role in primate evolution” published in September of 2016, gives the theory of how certain bones excavated from a coal mine in India resemble the first primates from as early as 65 million years ago (). This article states how these bones approximately reveal how a common ancestor would look like and act. Researchers believe that since having the qualities of both superfamilies, Adapoidea and Omomyoidea they left behind a large quantity of different skeletal traits. With the idea that the evolution of primates and their relatives occurred on an isolated island of idea then spread, that gives them the time to evolve and have the specific bone structure and abilities that key them into being…

    • 222 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    * Hominins: Modern humans and all extinct species more closely related to humans than chimps and bonobos…

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Studying primate dentition is a relatively old topic. There have been many studies conducted to find more information on primate dental morphology. The research is conducted to try and distinguish the relationship between diet and primate dentition. Primate teeth have several functions, but their primary function is the mastication of food. Their dental morphology reflects the various functions demanded by the variety of food types—shearing, chopping, grinding. Generally, incisors function chiefly for cutting, canines for grasping and piercing, and premolars and molars for chewing. Primate diets like: fruits, leaves, and insects, require specialized dentitions. Primates with specialized dental morphologies corresponding to their diets can be placed into one of three categories: insectivore, folivore, or frugivore. Many primate families have similar dental morphology analogous to what category they are in: insectivore, fulivore, or frugivore. Family Lemuridae are mainly insectivores, Family Pongidae are primarily folivores, while Family Homindae are omnivores. Most Families are also frugivores when fruit is in season.…

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bipedalism Hypothesis

    • 1208 Words
    • 5 Pages

    It is still being debated to on exactly when did the ancestor of our species began to walk on two legs. One hypothesis relies on a 6-7 million year old skull of Sahelanthropus tchadensis. The skull was discovered in the Djurab Desert in Chad. Since only the skull was discovered, it is still unclear on how Sahelanthropus tchadensis fits in our evolutionary…

    • 1208 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hominids – Creatures that exhibited some characteristics of Homo sapiens but others of earlier primates.…

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    After 300,000 y.a. tools become more complex and are labeled in Europe as the Middle Paleolithic or in Africa, as the Middle Stone Age (Ambrose 2001). Regional variation is great enough that cultural traditions become evident. Tools composed of two or more materials that require complicated preparation become common and suggest increasingly complex brains. The tool tradition associated with the Neanderthals in western Europe is called the Mousterian (Klein 1999). All are eventually replaced by the blade industries of the Upper Paleolithic which are associated with modern humans. Encephalization, Language and Speech; brain sizes expressed as estimated cranial capacities are commonly reported for various species of hominin. Australopithecus afarensis and A. africanus have the smallest averages to date at 410 and 440 cubic centimeters (cc.), respectively (Collard & Wood 1999). Chimpanzee cranial capacity also averages 410 cc. But chimpanzees weigh about 24% more than the australopiths, thus complicating this simple comparison. The cranial volume of the robust hominins such as P. robustus and P. boisei were in the 500’s and H. habilis, H. rudolfensis and H. ergaster averaged 610, 750, 850 cc.,…

    • 3142 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Primate Evolution Essay

    • 557 Words
    • 3 Pages

    A group of scientists lead by Biren Patel have recently found a partial mandible of an ancient primate related to lemurs. Scientists have named the new species Ramadapis sahnii and claim that it existed 11 to 14 million years ago, and is a member of the early primate family Sivaladapidae. Analysis of the jawbone shows that the species consumed leaves and was approximately the same size as a house cat, or to a modern day lemur. This discovery is important to the scientific community as with this discovery more information surrounding the evolutionary history of primates can be gathered and analysed. This new species will also help expand the phylogenetic tree for primates, making it significant to any scientist researching primate evolution.…

    • 557 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Becoming Human

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Human origins are of great mystery especially to scientists. This intact skull and it having a full set of teeth showed large and pointy canines which help distinguish ape’s teeth from early humans has completely disappeared then…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics