Preview

My Report on: “the Worst Mistake in the History of the Human Race”

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
856 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
My Report on: “the Worst Mistake in the History of the Human Race”
When I read Jared Diamond’s article he had some really good points that state why agriculture was not a step forward to creating the world that we live in now but actually a huge leap backwards that has led to the oppression of a certain gender and some enslavement of specific races. Another thing I do like about Jared Diamond’s article is that he says it all with one quote, “The Worst Mistake In The History Of The Human Race”. What that quote does is tell you that we as humans can’t blame our mistakes on other creatures or being but we can blame it on ourselves because we had to think and do things without saying, “ will this be a good idea in the future.” Obviously it went wrong. The article that Jared Diamond wrote is structured like this. At the beginning he talks about how we as humans have been smug about how we are the greatest being to ever walk on this planet Earth then he gives you a question that really gets you thinking, “Why did the hunter and gatherers switch to agriculture?” Then he starts explaining the reasons for why we did make this change in human history that’ll never be forgotten. In better words he states all the good things of hunting and gathering and all the disadvantages of agriculture. Then after all that he makes a great example of a clan of hunters and gathers called the Kalahari Bushman, who prospered off the concept of hunting and gathering. To prove this statement he states that during a month when food is plentiful they take in 2,140 calories. After this he goes into how we as humans have decreased in size because of malnutrition (you can read about this in paragraph two). Then on page three of the article he talks about how thanks to the domestication of animals that has led to a greater interaction with them has led to some specific diseases such as small pox, flu, measles, and the bubonic plague. And at the end of the article he states a quote that goes like this, “pretend that the entire history of humans was just one

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    In this section of Guns, Germs, and Steel, Diamond portal’s the food production was the root because of beneath the ability of the Eurasia people. This information helped develop guns, germs, and steel. This helped them conquer the rest of the world. Jared Diamond discusses how the food production came to this. The greater the population the more food can be produced. The more food you have for the people the longer they will live.…

    • 1366 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Not only this, but “the farmers profit margin dropped from 35% in the 1950 's to about 9% today.” (Mckibben, 54) This means that “to generate the same income as it did in 1950, a farm today would need to be roughly four times as large.” (Mckibben, 55) As a result of this perpetual growth and centralization, problems like “huge sewage lagoons, miserable animals, vulnerability to sabotage and food-born illness”(mckibben, 61) have become commonplace. Not only this, but “we are running out of the two basic ingredients we need to grow food on an industrial scale: oil and water.” (Mckibben, 62) The situation has become so dire that “we are now facing a near simultaneous depletion of the underground aquifers which have been responsible for the unsustainable, artificial inflation of food production.” At this point of realization, Mckibben begins indulging the reader in a large number of facts that promote a more localized form of farming as the solution to a seemingly endless number of issues. Initially the point is raised that “sustainable agriculture leads to a 93% increase in per-hectare food production.” (Mckibben, 68) The next idea raised is that, “since World War 1, it has been cheaper to use…

    • 3032 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    and gathering, claiming that that the negative effects on the human race by agriculture is so…

    • 1069 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Earth is filled with many different environments, but only a few are suitable for the domestication of crops. Throughout the first few chapters, Diamond emphasizes the importance of crops being domesticated in certain areas. The nation's that learned to domesticate crops first became more prosperous. A good example of this is the Fertile Crescent. The reason the Fertile Crescent got such a head start on developing a civilization was because they were quickly able to domesticate crops. Some civilization's, like the Maori people, could not prosper because they did not have the correct environment to do so. The book explains, "Maori tropical crops could not grow in the…

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Chapter 6: Diamond discusses why human agriculture was vital human societies. He explains how the decrease in hunting gathering made humans turn to more animal domestication, plant agriculture, ect. in around 8500 BC. This allowed easier food access and profit to sustain human societies more efficiently.…

    • 1148 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Helen Simpson Animals

    • 1998 Words
    • 8 Pages

    In Helen Simpson’s Diary of an Interesting Year, the audience is placed into the future where everything is corrupt and the food supply is based what the government supplying it to the people. Humans have come to greatly depend on plants and animals for various reasons such as clothing, oxygen to breathe, and of course food. In an article by Joshua Frank, he states “The high levels of meat consumption prevalent in Western nations have a wide range of negative consequences at both an individual and social level” (322). Although Frank’s argument that it should not be socially acceptable to eat animals if we can find alternative food with the same nutritional value seems morally correct, this is not very realistic. This idea is not plausible because it would take a bigger quantity of a different food, such as beans, to match up to the amount of protein gained by only a small portion of meat. Even if humans were to stop eating animal meat all together, we would still be using these animals such as sheep and silkworms for clothing. Although it may be morally wrong, humans also need animals for medical research and advancements. With humans causing climate change to be more noticeable, it only means that the extinction of certain animals is closer than ever meaning that humans will suffer from plant and animal loss. Extinction of plants and animals means we would be living in a world without viable sources of food, loss of needed knowledge, and even loss of currency. If humans continue to feed into climate change by greenhouse gases then our future may look similar to the situations faced in Simpson’s short…

    • 1998 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Diamond’s theory argues that civilization is created as the result of opportunity that is made achievable by pre-conditions of the area. He explains that diseases arose because of the formation of cities, agriculture, and domestication of animals in these areas. Some areas, like Europe and China, had environmental characteristics suited for the development of a culture and society. These environmental characteristics, like climate, geography, etc. favored an early growth of steady agricultural societies that eventually led to immunity to diseases and the ability become powerful enough to have the capacity to dominate…

    • 726 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stone Age Economics

    • 763 Words
    • 4 Pages

    First published in 1974, Marshall Sahlins' Stone Age Economics challenges that Western societies are more conducive to leisure and prosperity than traditional stone-age cultures. Using evidence from primitive cultures in Africa, Australia, and Asia, Sahlins argues that these hunter-gatherers live a more fulfilling life because they are not concerned with material possessions. While Western societies view scarcity as the basis of unhappiness, scarcity in stone-age societies is precisely what drives hunter-gatherers to live an abundant and "affluent" life.…

    • 763 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As the article was ending he began to try too hard to convince the reader and ended up losing the interest. He seemed to be blaming the entire world's problems on meat consumption. The problem is not eating the meat; it is how the meat is processed. Pace stated “Most of today's modernized farms have long, windowless sheds in which animals live like prisoners their entire lives” (Pace 355) He is saying that the way farms are being run now a days are destroying the environment and that is why eating meat is bad. Think back hundreds of years ago when the Native Americans used to roam North America. The animals were free, then hunted down and eaten. No one seemed to have a problem with animal consumption back then. The way to improve farms and the environment is not by not eating them, it is by changing they way they are processed. Even if most of the world decides to become a vegetarian the processing process will remain the same and the overpopulated animals will be killed the same, but this time it will go to waste because no one will eat it.…

    • 501 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I think ever since the mad cow disease became present, it has brought light back onto some Farms, yet that did not prepare me for the other controversies revolving around the meat packing industries, and why it was they found it easier to simply feed the cows the processed cows who had died. These scraps that the farmers use now have to be recycled which is causing most farmers to become upset as it means that is more money is put into recycling the products instead of just grinding it up and reusing it. Less waste is better in the farmer's eyes. Foods and society not only gave the farmers views on their way of running their farms but this class also showed how the government had a place in some of the decision making process, as well as the view points of consumers and protesters…

    • 1269 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Borlaug

    • 428 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In 2011, with the seventh million person born on this planet, the prediction that the population would outrun the food supply was proposed by Malthus (19th century) and Ehrlich (Population Bomb, 1968). Norman Borlaug was a scientist that won a Nobel Peace Prize because of his efforts in providing food for half the world through a green revolution. When criticized about his work, Dr, Borlaug simply responded saying that, “the real problem was not his agricultural techniques, but the runaway population growth that had made them necessary” (1). I believe that human beings are mouths to feed, rather than minds to cultivate. This is because if Malthus and Ehrlich could predict what would happen in the sense that the population would outrun the food supply in the 19th Century, than the people that have survived till today’s date have been a waste of resources. The new generation is founded on the basis of the letter I. What this means is that instead of collectively as a group of people taking responsibility to generate new and exciting ways to make/produce even more food from less resources, we tend to leave it up to less than 1% of the population to handle the situation.…

    • 428 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Mistake In History

    • 274 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Do you believe there was a worst mistake in the history of human race? Could it all kinda tie together, and be the same mistake in our history. I think it wasn't our worst mistake in history of the human race. I believe us not not getting rid of the terious in the world when we had the chance, like Hitler.…

    • 274 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Bibliography: Huntington, Samuel, (1993). “The Clash of Civilisations?”, Bint Jbeil, Ch.: I, II, III. Retrieved from, http://www.topicsinclinicalnutrition.com…

    • 1123 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Vandana Shiva’s monograph, Who Really Feeds the World? is a powerful piece on the pitfalls of mankind in terms of agriculture. At the current moment, humanity is falling into an industrialized world that cares more about profit and genetic modification than it does about the sustainability of mankind’s practices on the Earth. Through Shiva’s influential monograph, the reader is subjected to the biases that occur throughout the books, as well as the beliefs of the writer. It is easy to see Shiva’s biases throughout the monograph, and even though she argues fundamental aspects of sustainability, one cannot help but get caught up in her wariness of the industrialized world and the idea of global economy and trade. Shiva argues that through seeds-saving, agroecology, and other sustainable practices, the world will be able to not only feed itself but repair some of the damage we have done.…

    • 922 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hisory

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This article argues that there hasn’t been progress over the many years of the human race transition from hunters to agriculture and show evidence that proves this statement. According to Diamond, agriculture has caused many problems including malnutrition, starving, dangerous diseases and social and sexual inequality. Even though farmers were able to grow a lot of food and feed many of the population they were feeding themselves with food that had less nutrition then the hunters which showed that they chose quantity over quality. Also, many of these farmers starved in order to achieve this food making them depended on risky crops that may be destroyed if not handle with care unlike the hunters who were able to hunt for the food anytime. Also, this article questions if the increase in population was a good thing from agriculture because all it did was bring forth many diseases and separated society into elites who were always nourished look down on the masses struggling to get a meal. Strangely enough this made the farmers look like bullies to the hunters because they gave no one the choice to choose what they wanted to do. If the farmers needed a piece of land they would force the hunter to either choose their way of life or…

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays