Preview

muffin man

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
762 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
muffin man
Management 596
Alternate Final Exam Muffin Man is a “Mockumentary” other than a documentary, which describes the extinction of human species due to social excesses (mostly over-eating). Muffin Man shows us the distant future we are creating with our greedy crave and love for junk food, video games, and cars to the extreme that causes the downfall of human beings. Excess is the theme all through the movie. The movie itself, in addition to the overwhelming details and jokes, expresses the theme well enough. Simply put, the movie mirrors the real world situations that human beings are and will be pursuing things that might be unknowingly dangerous. The documentary presents through the overly used details and jokes to question whether morality and ethnicity of specific events throughout the human history. Utilitarianism indicates that an action is ethical if the predicted good outweighs the predicted bad. Although the concept seems quite simple, in practice, justifying utilitarianism often requires subjective analysis but there is no real standard for the justifications. For example, in the movie, it states that the evolution of human species gone down due to the excess intake of muffins. The extinction, which was shown through the discovery from the aliens in the distant future, was not predicted when far back to the Homo Twinkus time when the human species were overconsumption on food and other goods. This brings our attention to our real life that how we are appealed by the idea of excess of wealth, power, religion and entertainment. How the excess ownership of power wouldn’t cause the same effect as what muffins would cause to the human species. Indeed power and competitiveness brings the good, levels the play field and rules the world in a just way. However, there is no certainty and no way to predict the bad. There is an old saying, everything at moderation, which utilitarianism provides no justification in regards to moderation. The contradiction is that

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    in his book Justice, “Its (utilitarianism) main idea is simply stated and intuitively appealing: The…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Muckraker

    • 252 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Muckrackers were American novelists and journalists in the first decade of the twentieth century that exposed corruptions in big business and government.…

    • 252 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In short, the film delves into the life of a former corporate scientist for one of the biggest tobacco companies in the United States. Obviously, as a corporate scientist, the man knows the ins and outs of the tobacco industry, as well as the negative side effects of tobacco (which were unclear to the public at the time). When the man decides to…

    • 1053 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Utilitarianism is a theory in normative ethics holding that the proper course of action is the one that maximizes overall happiness. Utilitarianism can be characterized as a quantitative and reductionist approach to ethics. It can be contrasted with deontological ethics which does not regard the consequences of an act as a determinant of its moral worth.…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Utilitarianism revolves around the concept of “the end justifies the means.” It believes that outcomes as a result of an action have a greater value compared to the latter, the morally right action is the action that produces the most good. It also states that the most ethical thing to do is to take advantage of happiness for the good of the society. This normative theory considers the overall good for all people and not just a single person.…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    phil 111 exam

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages

    1. Utilitarianism is moral theory that tries to lay a set of rules that you should follow to achieve the most good or pleasure from any one act. Two popular proponents of this systems are philosophers by the name of Jeremy Bentham and James Mill. They both have different ideas for how one should go about the use of utilitarianism to achieve the greatest happiness. Bentham's approach is often called quantitative utilitarianism in which Bentham came up with an idea called the felicific calculus which is a way one can measure the level of happiness that can come out of one certain decision. For Bentham pleasure is countable and tangible, by this I mean that pleasure can be used as sort of a measuring system for what should be morally right or wrong. Now on the other hand James Mill takes a different view of utilitarianism in which he allows for so called greater pleasure. Meaning that even though the decision that the felicific calculus tells you to make may not be the most pleasurable because some decisions have the potential to grow overtime into a more rewarding pleasure. This is where Mills is commonly referred to as a qualitative utilitarianism because he differentiates between the qualities of the pleasures you can choose. This greater pleasure idea, though, also raises a few questions in such that is it really that the decision is a so called greater pleasure or is it that you choose such decision because of the opportunity to create more pleasure. It seems as though pleasure is still the end result when you make this decision it is just that you have the opportunity to fail or be successful in this decisions which is not really consistent with the idea of pleasure but more so of opportunity.…

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Utilitarianism theories hold that the moral worth of actions or practices is determined by their consequences. An action or practice is right if it leads to the best possible balance of good consequences over bad consequences for all affected parties. (Arnold, pp 17)…

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sugar Coated

    • 1277 Words
    • 6 Pages

    One scary fact that the film revealed is that doctors are now treating the first generation of children suffering from fatty liver disease. This disease is caused by eating too much sugar and it has recently come about. Does this mean more sugar based diseases will come? The goal this movie is trying to reach, is hopefully to convince enough people that something starts to change. For example, that doctors will start tracking sugar more often in people's diet and hopefully to trim the amount down. The movie's impact on people being affected by this is huge. People now realize how big this issue is and they are responding the right way. The movie did a good job with convincing people the truth is harsh in this situation. The movie talks about how much sugar Americans really eat on a daily basis. Moderation is the word the film used for average. The movie said, “Moderation is 6-9 tablespoons of sugar a day. America is at 19.5 tablespoons a day. We are consuming it in excess,” (“Sugar”). The last sentence is the most important. America is consuming sugar in excess. We are eating more sugar than average. Another good point the film made was, “There are 56 names for sugar,” (“Sugar”). Lustig wrote a book with that quote as the title. There are 56 names for sugar so that it can hide in the ingredient section on food boxes. The big idea that this film was trying to expose is that sugar is being eaten a lot faster than it should and that it is dangerous to people's health. Another interesting thing they found was that sugar is made up of two molecules, glucose and fructose. Glucose is the kind that spreads all throughout your body. Fructose goes straight to the liver. The liver eventually gets flooded and overwhelmed with fructose. The problem is that the whole time people were blaming the obesity problem on dietary fats. The science behind this is that when the liver gets too much sugar or fructose it…

    • 1277 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The ethical issues in this case revolve around the consumption of genetically modified (GM) foods. We have the supporters of GM food arguing that judging the actual risk should not occur until extensive scientific research has been conducted. Until then, they believe that these crops can effectively aid in feeding the world’s needy by providing higher per acre yields while having a reduced need for pesticides and herbicides. The Anti- “GMers” present another view, as they fear the supporters are expecting too much from GM food. These opponents of GM insist on further long-term studies on the effects on the environment; dangers to wildlife and plants; how it will affect the food chain in regards to control of the gene flow prior to any wide distribution.…

    • 702 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Utilitarian

    • 1097 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Utilitarian approach holds that the maximization of happiness ultimately determines what is just and unjust. According to John Stuart Mill’s contended more specified that the concept of justice identifies certain rules or rights. Mill’s theory promotes well-being and injustice always involves violating the rights of some identifiable individual. Utilitarian’s favor whichever economic system will be the most good for society as a whole. As a Utilitarian the answer must depend on the relevant social, economic and political facts. In this situation Utilitarian would state that the environment is at risk no matter how much water Nestle’ draws out; the pumps need to be turned off. A…

    • 1097 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In this essay, the ethical analysis applied to debate human genetic engineering is the Utilitarianism theory. The Utilitarian method seeks to maximize the utility of an act or a rule while minimizing the pain that could possibly be caused. Utilitarian principles are the foundation of many US policies, especially those that deal with economics and trade (1, P4, Williams, 1999). Utility is very tightly linked to efficiency and productivity, and maximum efficiency classically concurs with maximum utility. However, a Utilitarian argument can seem imperfect when dealing with concerns of justice and personal rights, which is the case with…

    • 1595 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Which is more valuable: a game of push-pin or the study of Latin? Which has greater worth: the life of a single young girl or the lives of an entire community? These are the sorts of questions raised when dealing with the matter of utilitarianism. According to Jeremy Bentham, the father of the theory, the ultimate moral goal of human beings should be to increase pleasure and to decrease pain. To maximize the amount of time spent in content, and minimize the times of depression. And he has a point. Simply stated like that, everyone can agree that that is definitely something they want to achieve. But when his theory is applied to real-life conditions, the varying answers and resulting situations aren 't always applicable with such a cut-and-dry cure-all. Contrary to Bentham 's theory, just because doing something may seem to create an overall better situation than not doing something, it doesn 't necessarily mean that it should be done.…

    • 1260 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Basics of Economics

    • 2786 Words
    • 12 Pages

    So basically, trying to maximize your utility means spending more risks, so in the end or future, it’s better for us. However, life is always a roller coaster; it has ups and downs, just like the future of your utility. There’s always a trade-off. You either risk it now or gain utilities after, or you use your utility now, and face the consequence later. If you harass your boss out of anger, you may feel relieved for a while but a couple of months later; you may see yourself in jail. If you save up money to buy the latest technology instead of purchasing the golf clubs you wanted,…

    • 2786 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Theory of Justice

    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages

    According to Areson, utilitarianism is the principle Rawls reputes as the most difficult form and type of teleology, which he describes as a theory that not only expresses the good as independent from the right but states and identifies the right while maximizing the good. Utilitarianism usually is taken as a theory of justice and holds that “society is rightly ordered, and therefore just, when its major institutions are arranged so as to achieve the greatest net balance of satisfaction summed over all the individuals belonging to it”. Rawls argues that utilitarianism discounts the separateness and clearness of persons and does not recognize that justice is what free persons would choose as the principles to order or control their social cooperation under terms and situations that are fair.…

    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Utilitarianism , utility encourges people to do the wrong thing ‘’ if right action is taken to…

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays