Comparison Morton versus the Puritan view
William Bradford was the leader of one of the earliest colonial settlements in the United States, of which Thomas Morton was a settler. Bradford documented his exploits in “Of Plymouth Plantation” to gain support from his home country and fellow colonists. Bradford’s work, however, differs from Morton’s “New English Canaan” which also describes the events which took place in the colonies and his views of the Cavaliers, the Indians, and the Pilgrims. Bradford applies his rhetoric to amplify God to respectfully reduce his poor mistreated people while Morton uses his to satirize those same people and to show off the superiority of his own learning. The contrast between Bradford and Morton can be not only to found the relation of the two authors and the nature of their rhetoric, but elevate essential moral questions about the whole colonial endeavor, particularly with respect to the Indians. Thomas Morton was born around 1576 in Devon; England. He was a lawyer, writer and social reformer, popular for founding the colony of Merrymount and his work studying Native American culture. Morton wrote New English Canaan, which was his only work that got published. New English Canaan is separated in three books. The first was about the Indians of New England, and reports and speculates on their languages, beliefs etc. The second book explains the natural resources of New England. And, the third was about the lives of the Puritans and their problems with the residents of Ma-re-Mount. Morton was not a religious man. Also, Morton was viewed with hostility by the pilgrims of nearby Plymouth and other settlements, who considered their reveling and association with the local Indians to be immoral. He sold liquors and firearms to the natives to injure the trade of Plymouth and to endanger the safety of the colonists. The Puritans viewed the Indians as savages. That was why he was arrested and sent to England. The Puritans said...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document