Morality and Ethics and Computers
Morality and Ethics and Computers
There are many different sides to the discussion on moral and ethical uses of computers. In many situations, the morality of a particular use of a computer is up to the individual to decide. For this reason, absolute laws about ethical computer usage is almost, but not entirely, impossible to define. The introduction of computers into the workplace has introduced many questions as well: Should employers make sure the workplace is designed to minimize health risks such as back strain and carpal tunnel syndrome for people who work with computers? Can employers prohibit employees from sending personal memos by electronic mail to a friend at the other side of the office? Should employers monitor employees ' work on computers? If so, should employees be warned beforehand? If warned, does that make the practice okay? According to
Kenneth Goodman, director of the Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy at the
University of Miami, who teaches courses in computer ethics, "There 's hardly a business that 's not using computers."1 This makes these questions all the more important for today 's society to answer. There are also many moral and ethical problems dealing with the use of computers in the medical field. In one particular case, a technician trusted what he thought a computer was telling him, and administered a deadly dose of radiation to a hospital patient.2 In cases like these, it is difficult to decide who 's fault it is. It could have been the computer programmer 's fault, but
Goodman asks, "How much responsibility can you place on a machine?"3 Many problems also occur when computers are used in education. Should computers replace actual teachers in the classroom? In some schools, computers and computer manuals have already started to replace teachers. I would consider this an unethical use of computers because computers do not have the ability to think and interact on an interpersonal basis. Computers
There are many different sides to the discussion on moral and ethical uses of computers. In many situations, the morality of a particular use of a computer is up to the individual to decide. For this reason, absolute laws about ethical computer usage is almost, but not entirely, impossible to define. The introduction of computers into the workplace has introduced many questions as well: Should employers make sure the workplace is designed to minimize health risks such as back strain and carpal tunnel syndrome for people who work with computers? Can employers prohibit employees from sending personal memos by electronic mail to a friend at the other side of the office? Should employers monitor employees ' work on computers? If so, should employees be warned beforehand? If warned, does that make the practice okay? According to
Kenneth Goodman, director of the Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy at the
University of Miami, who teaches courses in computer ethics, "There 's hardly a business that 's not using computers."1 This makes these questions all the more important for today 's society to answer. There are also many moral and ethical problems dealing with the use of computers in the medical field. In one particular case, a technician trusted what he thought a computer was telling him, and administered a deadly dose of radiation to a hospital patient.2 In cases like these, it is difficult to decide who 's fault it is. It could have been the computer programmer 's fault, but
Goodman asks, "How much responsibility can you place on a machine?"3 Many problems also occur when computers are used in education. Should computers replace actual teachers in the classroom? In some schools, computers and computer manuals have already started to replace teachers. I would consider this an unethical use of computers because computers do not have the ability to think and interact on an interpersonal basis. Computers
Bibliography: 1 Timothy O 'Conner, "Computers Creating Ethical Dilemmas," USA Today Magazine (September 1995) 7 2 Max Frankel, "Cyberrights," The New York Times Magazine (February 12, 1995) 26 3 O 'Conner 7 4 James Coates, "Unabomber Case Underscores an On-Line Evil," Chicago Tribune (April 14, 1996) 5 5 Coates 5 6 O 'Conner 7 7 Tom Forester, Computers in the Human Context (Cambridge: The MIT Press,1989) 403 8 Stephen A. Booht, "Doom Virus," Popular Mechanics (June 1995) 51 9 Philip Albinus, "Have You Seen This PC?," Home Office Computing (February 1996) 17