Preview

Moral Value: the Death Penalty

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1421 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Moral Value: the Death Penalty
Running head: MORAL VALUE: THE DEATH PENALTY

Moral Value: The Death Penalty

Moral Value: The Death Penalty The death penalty is a moral value issue that has brought much controversy within society. It is morally justifiable to continue to practice the death penalty for convicted felons who are a threat to society. The death penalty is authorized in 37 states in the United States as well as by the U.S. Military. There are 13 states as well as the District of Columbia that do not practice the death penalty. Capital punishment, another term used for the death penalty in the United States, is reserved mainly for those convicted of aggravated murder or felony murder. Other crimes that may fall under the capital punishment category are use of a weapon of mass destruction, treason against the United States, terrorism, and in some states aggravated kidnapping. Sentencing a person to death is the job of a judge that is assigned on a case by case basis. Each of the above listed crimes should be taken on a case by case basis, however, the death penalty should remain an option if the crime is violent, and if the criminal is unable to safely be returned to society. Those who oppose the death penalty claim that the death of a convicted felon is costly, and also point to the possibility of a wrongful conviction. These arguments are not relevant due to the alternative cost of keeping someone in prison and the accuracy and fairness of the current justice system in the United States. The first, and probably most morally justifiable, reason to continue to allow capital punishment is the justice and closure it gives to the families of the victims of violent crime (Messerli, 2012). When a family member is violently taken away by another person there is nothing that can be done to bring that person back, however, the justice that is brought when the offender is sentenced to the same fate is some comfort to family members. One



References: Earley, Mark. (September 2, 2009). Prison Overcrowding and Public Safety. Retrieved from http://www.breakpoint.org Kane, Gregory. (February 5, 2003). To murder victims’ families, executing killers is justice. Retrieved from http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/maryland/bal-md Messerli, Joe. (2012). Should the Death Penalty be Banned as a Form of Punishment?. Retrieved from http://www.balancedpolitics.org/death_penalty.htm Sharp, Dudley. (2012). Innocence Issues: The Death Penalty. Retrieved from http://www.prodeathpenalty.com/innocence.htm

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The death penalty is a controversial topic that has existed since the beginning of civilization. The death penalty, and capital punishment are interchangeable terms that provide legalized murders at the hands of the government. This form of killing is permitted in approximately 38 states (Capital Punishment, 2011). The death penalty has been a way for humans to control one another throughout history. The death penalty is a chancy way of instilling justice. In addition, there is no guarantee that the person sentenced to death is completely innocent. For many years, the death penalty has been the cause of many innocent and untimely deaths. The death penalty is a final decision to a possible mistake. Also, the death penalty infringes on…

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Death Penalty

    • 4048 Words
    • 17 Pages

    Thesis: Capital punishment is useless as a deterrent, morally indefensible, discriminatory in practice, and prone to errors that may have led to the execution of wrongfully convicted people. Its continuing legality in the United States is critically undermining American moral stature around the world. The Supreme Court should bring the United States in line with the rest of the civilized world and hold that death is a cruel and unusual punishment prohibited by the Eighth Amendment. Summary: The death penalty process consumes tremendous amounts of money and resources and fails to deter criminal activity. It is not uniformly applied geographically, and where it is allowed, it is used in an often arbitrary and racist manner. As a result, states have been curtailing the use of the death penalty, the Supreme Court has limited its application, and both death sentences and executions are down sharply. This is at odds with the recent efforts of some states to expand the range of capital crimes, and with national polls which still reflect a clear majority of Americans favor capital punishment. Meanwhile, momentum has been accelerating in the international community to abolish the death penalty, and the United States is increasingly criticized for failing to keep in step with other civilized nations in this area. Capital Punishment in the United States Since the 1977 resumption of capital punishment in the United States, nearly 1,100 convicted prisoners have been put to death in the thirty-eight US states where the practice remains legal. As of the beginning of 2007, approximately 3,350 people remain on death row in American prisons. In recent years, the evidence has shown that the death penalty process consumes tremendous amounts of money and resources and fails to deter criminals. FBI Uniform Crime…

    • 4048 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    California's Death Penalty

    • 1681 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The death penalty is the sentence of execution for murder and other capital crimes. Which are punishable by death? The death penalty is used only in 38 states (www.deathpenalty.org). The state of California is home to the nation's most clogged death row, housing 641 men and women pending lethal injection. Having to house all these criminals is costing tax payers millions of dollars. Capital punishment in California, as in every other state, is more expensive than a life imprisonment sentence without the opportunity of parole. These costs are not the result of careless appeals but instead the result of constitutionally mandated safeguards (www.deathpenalty.org). Even with the careless appeals and mandated safeguards were having to take a closer look into convicted felons' cases and by doing so we have saved a large number of wrongfully convicted people. Capital punishment, the death penalty, is a highly controversial method used in punishing people who kill another human being. It has raised difficult moral, practical, and legal issues. The debate over capital punishment continues to be pursed in both courts and the political arena (Capital Punishment, pg.3). The debate can be sorted out around several questions:…

    • 1681 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Capital Punishment has been a topic of debate in America since the 17th century. Although many abiding citizens oppose the death penalty, there are many ways for them to feel this way. However, there are also various supporting reasons for 38 states to consider Capital Punishment as very effective. Some of the pros involved in this long-fought debate are justice, closure for victims’ families, cost of inmates, deterrence, and punishment that is equal to the crime which was committed. In opposition, some of the cons are cost of execution, humanity, morality, religion, and unnecessary pain for the family of the executed prisoner.…

    • 1139 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Americans have for a long time been in favor of capital punishment for convicted murderers. In a 1981 Gallup Poll, two-thirds of Americans spoke their opinion for the Death Penalty (Radelet, Akers, 1996). These polls have determined that most Americans are very clear about the issue that the Death Penalty is justified punishment for murder. The justification suggests that murderers should be executed for the killing alone, murderers should suffer, and just…

    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Looking out for the state of the public's satisfaction in the scheme of capital sentencing does not constitute serving justice. Today's system of capital punishment is thick with inequalities and injustices. The commonly offered arguments for the death penalty are filled with holes." It was a deterrent. It removed killers. It was the ultimate punishment. It is biblical. It satisfied the public's need for retribution. It relieved the anguish of the victim's family." All of these reasons prove to either be wrong or not fully supported. Morally, it is a continuation of the cycle of violence and degrades all who are involved in its enforcement, as well as its victim.…

    • 846 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Capital punishment is, undeniably, one of the most highly debated topics in the United States. Many Americans support capital punishment, but they are wrong to do so. Many people use the argument that capital punishment deters crime and recent studies have shown that it does deter crime. Over the years, several studies have demonstrated a link between executions and decreases in murder rates (Haugen). While this is true, people do not realize there are several reasons why the death penalty should be abolished. The three main reasons capital punishment should be abolished is too many innocent inmates are either executed or put on death on row, capital punishment is morally wrong, and it would save the government millions of dollars if capital punishment was not in place.…

    • 1054 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The death penalty has been an ongoing debate on whether it should be allowed or whether it violates our constitutional right. While most developed Western nations have stopped executing the United States continues to execute offenders (Zimring 2004). From 1977 through 2008 1,136 people have been executed, which consisted of people who committed murder (Procon 2010). Those who are in favor of the death penalty believe it is an important tool to help deter crime and it cost less than life imprisonment (Procon 2010). They believe retribution helps console the grieving family and it also ensures that the offender will never be able to commit another heinous crime (Procon 2010). According to Grant (2004) some people believe that some offenders should face the death penalty because of vengeance and retribution for violent crimes. During the…

    • 1847 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    As of April 1, 2008, there were 3,320 convicted murderers on death row, and of those 3,320 people, 65% of the murderers had a prior felony conviction (“The Death” 1). At the time that the 3,320 murderers on death row committed their crime, 26.7% of the murderers were on probation or parole (“The Death” 1). Therefore, it is obvious that convicted murderers pose a colossal threat to our society because the murders may not only commit murder once. When the death penalty is enforced, repeat criminals and murderers are no longer a threat; furthermore, the death penalty acts as a deterrent (Ornellas 6). Additionally, the death penalty provides swift justice for the victims and their families. Even though the death penalty should be used as a punishment for murder, only thirty-three states have not outlawed the death penalty (“States” 1). Convicted murderers are a mammoth threat to the public because the murders have the possibility of being released; therefore, the death penalty should be enacted in all states.…

    • 1784 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The moral issue of whether the death penalty is right or wrong and its constitutionality, is beyond this argument. The death penalty already exists in 36 states, and, given its existence, it should be enforced. Since the United States Supreme Court reinstated the death penalty in 1976, 36 States have legislated capital punishment statutes (Capital Punishment, 1992). All but 13 states and the District of Columbia have death as a sentencing option, including Alaska, Hawaii, Iowa, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, New York, North Dakota, Rhode Island, Vermont, West Virginia, and Wisconsin (Norman, 1). Since capital punishment is already in existence, the problem is that it is not enforced. This lack of enforcement translates into inefficient functioning of the criminal justice system.…

    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    When understanding criminal law it is important to consider the positive and negative effects that different punishment alternatives can have. Over the last century the use of capital punishment, the legal process for which an individual is sentence to death when found guilty of committing a crime, has been a subject debated back and forth between government parties on its effectiveness. Many people believe that the issues of fairness, constitutionality, morality of an individual’s life, and potential of convicting the innocent are too important to allow the use of the…

    • 2611 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    From the murdered victim’s family perspective, we seek justice for our beloved one; we have to be the voice of our loved one since they cannot speak for themselves. I understand that capital punishment is a subject of controversial debate in the United States, and some people are against the death penalty, as they believe it to be cruel and unusual punishment. However, the Supreme Court has taken precautions and enacted a sentencing guideline to ensure that capital punishment is the right sentence; “States could establish a two-stage procedure consisting of a trial at which the question of culpability could be determined, during which evidence might be presented to make the death penalty decision better informed.” (Hendrix & Inciardi, 2013,…

    • 203 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Does it make sense to impose the death penalty? Reinstatement of the death penalty is a famous topic that has been argued across nations for many years. There is no right or wrong decision of whether or not to reinstate the death penalty because there are strong beliefs and opinions supporting either side. Even though there are strong beliefs and opinions supporting both sides, I still believe that death penalty should be imposed. The reason is that I believe everybody is responsible for their own actions and the person that committed a crime must be severely punished. I am also a believer of the current justice system. When our justice system found a person is guilty, there will be good amounts…

    • 1308 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    “The death penalty is a form of punishment that involves executing a person after he or she has been found guilty of a crime by his or her legal system” (What Is the Death Penalty?). In the United States, our government has established several crimes that are worthy of earning the death penalty sentence. Many people are unaware of what crimes our government have set aside and deemed ‘death penalty worthy’. These crimes include:…

    • 3442 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Having the Death Penalty as a punishment for capital criminals can provide possible closure for the families of victims. Many victims spawn from a single crime. An example of a case in which closure for a victim is provided was in June 25, 2008 when Petitioner Patrick Kennedy was convicted and sentenced to death in Louisiana for the rape of his 8 year-old stepdaughter (Kennedy v. Louisiana US Supreme Court, 554 U.S. June 25, 2008). Though the sentence didn’t provide complete closure for the victim’s families, it did provide a resolution in knowing justice has been served. Another example of a case in which a sense of resolution is reached was in June 29, 1977 when Erlich Anthony Coker, while serving sentences for murder, rape, kidnapping, and assault, escaped from a Georgia jail.…

    • 763 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays