Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Moral Rights Summary

Better Essays
1628 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Moral Rights Summary
Beaten, tortured, and whipped. Living on the edge while dangling off a cliff. Only these Africans could ever express the suffering and gruesome nights they faced. In regards to the colonization of lands originally inhabited by people of color, finding the line that distinguishes the benefits from the misfortunes of white Europeans and the people they colonized, is more complex than simply the victor and the defeated. In theory, Europe’s conquest of the new world was intended to have been a movement that would elevate not only the European countries but also the nations they would infiltrate. Only through this discourse were these “maternal countries” able to legitimize the various systems of oppression. Colonialism seemed to have a clear beneficiary but after closer examination in this game, no winner would be identified. Colonialism breed the internalization of pseudo-humanism in both the the colonizer and the colonized. During the establishment of colonization, the moral base of the colonizer was disassembled and sold for wealth. While the colonized were massacred and exploited which undermined the futures of their economies and national development. In this paper I take you on a conquest to explore the effects of colonization on the ingenious people of Africa, particularly Democratic Republic of Congo; as well as the European colonizers. Europe and Africa had established a relationship centuries before Europe’s intrusion of the continent for its goods. European countries were competing for power and wealth. According to W.E.B Du Bois’s article “Worlds of Color”, European countries like Belgium, France and England were looking to maintain and engage the the competitive market for manufactured goods throughout western civilization. In order to execute this, European countries pursued cheap labor and the lush natural resources of countries closer to the equator were the best places to ensure monitory gain. They yearned for expansion. They needed more land to control. There answers lied in colonialism. Colonialism by definition is the practice of acquiring full or partial political control over another country by occupying the land with settlers and exploiting it economically. In Aime Cesaire’s Discourse of Colonialism, he exclaims what it is not “... neither evangelization, philanthropic enterprise, nor a desire to push back the frontiers of ignorance, disease, and tyranny, nor a project undertaken for the greater glory of God, nor an attempt to extend the rule of law”. Cesaire makes these point because during and after colonization, these claims were made to justify the actions of the European countries. The story was that these countries were taking scientific expeditions, wanted to convert the heathens and educate them. By making these powers seem innocent or oblivious to the evils they would sow these myths to cover it up. In King Leopold’s Ghost, King Leopold II was a primary example of Du Bois’s claim. Because of his strong desires to enter the new world’s competitive market, he used deception of his parliament to gain access to Africa to satisfy the greed that was beginning to build up within himself. From inception the entire project would breed brutality and violation of African people. Colonization would “awaken him to buried instincts, to covetousness, violence, race hatred and moral relativism ...” (Cesaire 35) . Leopold hired Henry Morton Stanley who decimated villages and had over one hundred men die just while he was exploring the Congo. Stanley treated the people like animals. He would kill them if they refused servitude. The sacrifice of people’s lives seemed like a fair exchange for the quarter million dollars he would receive yearly during his five year contract. It is amusing to think that he nor the people who employed him had not taken into consideration that while extending their civilization they were forever destroying establishments that already were there and held of importance. “Nobody didn 't bow down to nobody just so. To get a man to follow your instructions you had to pen him and beat him and cut off his ears or his foot when he run away. You had to take away his woman from him and his child. And still that fellow stand up and oppose you.” (Lovelace) The European nations took over indigenous people of Africa’s establishments by force, thievery and deception. In order to obtain cheap free labor to carry out the establishment of their colonies, Europeans used immoral practices to instill fear in the people to make them work. They did so by using iron cuffs and chains to make them feel shameful, uncomfortable, and less than human. “...wherever there are colonizers and colonized face to face I see force, brutality, cruelty, sadism, conflict ...” (Cesaire 42). Thousands of Africans were murdered or died unnatural deaths. In Congo, Africans were mutilated. Their hands were dismember if they would drop materials or didn’t reach the quota set for them for that particular day. Because of the industrial revolution rubber had become essential. The africans would place the rubber on their skin a rip it off for collection. Orphans, whose parents were more than likely killed in the scramble for Africa, were made shoulder’s “so that the only persons they were loyal to was the state” as mention in King Leopold’s Ghost. The women were sexually objectified, raped and treated as bait to ensure the men would do their work. “They beat them. They hold them down and turn them over and do whatever wickedness they could manage ...” (Lovelace). All the ingenious people were dehumanized and treated and worked like animals and and they were uncompensated for indefinitely. Cesaire explains that in order for the colonized to be comfortable his action he animalized the colonized and inherently colonized himself. By 1912 all parts of Africa had been colonized except for Ethiopia and Liberia. All parts of Africa had been unethically taken advantage of as well. In 1884 western leaders met in Berlin to discuss how territories in Africa would be divided civilly. This meant that lines were drawn that split up ethnic groups and forced rivalry ethnic groups to come to together. These colonies were drawn up with complete disregard of the ethnic groups histories and statues that they lived by. People were placed together who didn’t even speak the same languages but were forced to work together or else they would be killed. Within these colonies hierarchies were built and even more social and class division happened on top of what was already established. This was all done in the interest on economics, wealth and power. King Leopold died with one of the greatest fortunes known to man and I was hidden and tucked away for himself. All that is left of his legacy is death and stories of cruelty and exploitation. After the colonization era ended immediate lack of development and finical ruin became apparent in mostly all of the newly independent countries. It was very apparent that reform and reorganization needed to be made if these countries wanted to recover from the invasion of the European mother lands. Cesiare spoke on the fact that although the Europeans had removed themselves they could remove the infrastructure they left for these people the ports, the railroad lines none of it was made to benefit the African countries themselves. The European governments destabilized these countries. It was in their best interest to keep them that way because Africa has so many resources that are “essential to the modern world”. White people seem to be enslaved to power because they only allow governments to run in way that benefit them. A prime example would be the assassination of Lumumba the first democratically elected prime minister of the DRC by Untied States and Belgium officials. Although they had removed themselves politically these countries couldn’t help but to kill someone who was leading their people in a direction contrary to what favored western political interest. Despite their efforts “it is the colonized man who wants to move forward, and the colonizer who holds things back” (Cesaire 46) There have not been many successful government that have come out of Africa after they were released from European rule after World War II. Most government officials follow the model that was left for them to govern the people. These leaders continue to be corrupt thieves and puppets that Europeans countries continue to exploit for their own benefit. Most of the countries in Africa are considered to be third world countries whose population are consist mostly of children. This makes a 360 degree circle because although the European Nations do not political rule over these countries they are the source of income to the country. With new natural resources being found constantly the need for cheap labor is still needed. There are no worker’s rights and African people world for little to nothing. Gaining health issue in the process. The younger generations suffering from deformations because of exposure to radioactive materials. African countries are among the poorest of the world. In February 2013 Zimbabwe 's president announced that there was only $217 in the National Treasury. That Nation is completely bankrupt as are so many others. “The great historical tragedy of Africa has been not so much that it was too late in making contact with the rest of the world ... that it was our misfortune to encounter that particular Europe on our path, and that Europe is responsible before the human community for the highest heap of corpses in human history.” (Cesaire 45) Through colonization Europe underdeveloped Africa and morally debased itself. The desire of wealth as left Western civilization enslaved to machines and has left Africa raped of it’s potential and of it’s essence. Works Cited
Césaire, Aimé. Discourse on Colonialism. New York: Monthly Review Press, 2000. Print.
Du Bois, W.E.B. Worlds of Color. Spelman College. 2013
Lovelace, Earl. Bango. Spelman College. 2013
King Leopold’s Ghost

Cited: Césaire, Aimé. Discourse on Colonialism. New York: Monthly Review Press, 2000. Print. Du Bois, W.E.B. Worlds of Color. Spelman College. 2013 Lovelace, Earl. Bango. Spelman College. 2013 King Leopold’s Ghost

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Simply put, in order for Europe to support its’ thirst for resources, it had to take over African countries such as Angola (Background Essay). As a matter of fact, Angola contained resources such as cotton, oils, coffee, and sugar to which Europe used for its’ fabric and food processing industries. Hence why Angola, later, became a European colony due to the economic benefits its resources provided for the Industrial Revolution (Doc D). Another snippet of proof to support that Europe required more resources, includes a chart adapted from Trevor Lloyd’s, The British Empire, which demonstrates that between the years 1854 and 1900, Great Britain spent approximately 2 million more pounds on African imports, illustrating that Great Britain was, indeed, in need of more African resources (Doc E). With all this evidence in mind, European nations such as Great Britain were definitely in need of more resources to which Africa was plentiful…

    • 952 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the driving forces behind European imperialism was the need for resources. The Europeans didn’t know anything about Africa and was unknown to them until the mid 1800s. When the Europeans discovered…

    • 655 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The intention of colonialism, though cloaked with moral justification, was clear from the beginning: in order to assert oneself as a dominant power, a country must steal, ravish and exploit the land, people and culture belonging to another. The belief that taking of foreign land was justified because a particular country had the power to do so with little genuine resistance was so prevalent during the late Nineteenth, early Twentieth centuries that it significantly, and tragically affected those colonized land. In Adam Hochschild’s novel, King Leopold’s Ghost, he details chronicles that events that shaped King Leopold of Belgium’s rule over the Congo in Africa, but also illustrates that what went on was not aberrant. Rather, it was example of a broader problem that plagued many Europeans countries in the decades leading up to World War One that led to the death of millions.…

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the time of 1892-1975, The continent of Africa was struggling with imperialist aggression, military invasions and eventually colonisation. Many countries within Africa were occupied by other, more powerful, countries. This impacted the social effect placed on the indigenous people of africa. For…

    • 644 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The intended audience was the German public to increase the support for the conquest and to show the new map of Africa. The purpose is to show that new lines were drawn on the map of Africa to permit countries to gain valuable resources and to carry out the civilization. Document 4 provides an insight to how the European public felt toward the colonization of Africa, and their belief that it was necessary. The intended audience is the British public. In places that were overcrowded and unemployed populations, this document reasoned people to concur to the concept of colonization. Document 9 shows how socialist parties viewed the concept of colonization and the reasons for it. This document, whose intended audience is the public, fiddles the public over the reasons behind the European colonization of Africa. The purpose of this document is to get the public to detest and oppose the…

    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Much of Africa's history revolves around it’s interactions with Europeans. The Europeans exploited and conquered much of the African continent. They were able to conquer Africa through imperialism which is a process of invasion, attack and exploitation for natural resources. Africa had many natural resources that Europeans wanted to themselves and the only solution they came up with was to conquer Africa.…

    • 648 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Benefits to Africa as a result of imperialism were plentiful. A primary document, “Does Colonization Pay”, details the many improvements made to the continent; Africa was home to innumerable, rich resources. As a result, Europe was able to utilize these as raw materials, and return the money to Africa. The money was also used to bring the people of Africa food supply, as well as other supplies that were much needed. Besides this, these nations created “roads, canals, railways, and telegraphs”, along with “schools and newspapers” (Document 1). As displayed by the information, imperialism was seen to have profound effects on Africa. Not only did they utilize the rich resources to supply economic gain to the continent, but also significantly developed the continent by providing means of transportation, education, and a source of news. Unfortunately, these benefits were not of significant value due to the immense oppression experienced by the people of Africa during the age of imperialism.…

    • 965 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    How Were Concepts Of Race

    • 1368 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Beginning around the 1700s, under the development of technology in many aspects, the Europeans started their expedition to explore the world. After the discover of many unknown lands, they soon developed a policy to extend their power and influence through colonies, with violence and blood. The policy was known as “imperialism”. In Africa, European imperialists ruled, killed, enslaved, and traded millions of native Africans like merchandise while also robbing all the approachable natural resources. Imperialists apparently brought a catastrophe into Africa while they even caused a lot of leftover problems to the modern Africa. However, back to the 1800s, imperialists did not think imperialism was a fault. With better-developed technology, Europeans started to believe that they enjoyed superiority in all aspects, including economics, culture and race. They made up many justifications to defend their crimes that related to these three aspects. Most of the justification could be categorized into two camps: the “internal camp” and the “external camp”. In the “internal camp”, imperialists justified themselves by connecting “nationalism” and “imperialism”, which they believed ruling an “inferior race” was an efficient way to enrich their home countries. One of the related theories was “Social Darwinism”. The “external camp” believed the intention of imperialism was to help and benefit the “barbaric” natives. One of the popular theories was the “duty theory”. However, activist Roger Casement heavily criticized imperialism by using the same concepts. He disproved both camps by pointing that imperialism neither necessarily enriched nations nor brought any benefit to the natives. With his documentary report on the Congo Free State, which was privately controlled by King Leopold II of Belgium, we could observe the…

    • 1368 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The one key reason European leaders even bothered with Africa is that they knew resources would come and they would earn back money, and gain more money, while doing so. European leaders went to Africa to get gold. Gold was used in things such as jewelry. They wanted slaves, although slavery became outlawed.They hoped to either sell or make industrial and economic uses out of the minerals and other materials. Back in Document D, it was stated everything they hoped to achieve industrial wise. Europeans also wanted exports / imports to further…

    • 665 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    European Nations wanted more land, power, and natural resources. They got this by conquering and colonizing new lands. Africa was not colonized, making the continent a prime area for colonization. Prior to the 19th century European nations only used Africa for its slave trade, therefore, only settling on the coasts. The driving forces behind these European conquests in Africa were caused by political, cultural, and economic reasons.…

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    When European countries came and took over foreign lands, they were bountifully blessed with new resources. Even if some of them were human resources. Great Britain and France both altogether, took over about half of Africa, when they did they got many goods like gold, silver, copper, and oil. When the Europeans concord the African lands, their world was opened up to an abundance of new and raw resources.The raw materials that the Europeans received were then shipped back to Europe to make the things that they loved. The resources were stolen, but sometimes the natural resources were given or traded to them.…

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    European Imperialism

    • 612 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Africa was a region that was largely untouched in terms of old imperialism (mercantilism) and a highly attractive to Europe’s dominant countries. The discovery of gold and diamonds had only increased interest in…

    • 612 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    African American Imperialism

    • 3738 Words
    • 15 Pages

    In definition colonialism is the situation where by the strong country control the weak country in socially, economically, and politically normally these strong country introduce little benefits or not to the weakest so as to get more from them, such they doing is like introduction of education which based on the their side, example they introduce their culture, example adoption of the Western culture in Africa. Also these strong country they introduce crops which benefit them, example cash crops, sisal introduced in Africa by German. Due to all above, it shows that the colonialism in Africa was, due to a number of reasons. This essay will attempt to discuss the merits and demerits derived by Africa from the European colonial experience by…

    • 3738 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Colonialism and Human Rights, A Contradiction in Terms? The Case of France and West Africa by Alice L Conklin published by the American Historical Review in 1998 revisits the cultural, political, and ethical implications of Western colonization and how the French empire justified expansion. The purpose of this study is to reanalyze the French government's actions to colonize uncivilized countries in Africa. The reason for writing the article was to weigh in on this discussion of France’s involvement in colonization. This topic has become popular for historians to discuss because the ramifications are present in today's society. Conklin is a historian that specializes in Modern France in the twentieth century and uses this to create a critical…

    • 1296 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Colonialism is the practice of exploration, exploitation and expansion by a powerful country, over foreign dependent land. Originating in the 1400’s with Christopher Columbus, colonialism gained its reverence as it proved valuable politically, socially, and most importantly economically for powerful nations. Colonization was run by the colonists, for the colonists, meaning all other parties suffered. In the 1800’s, the “Scramble for Africa,” marked the beginning of racial oppression towards Blacks. Originally desired for their resource abundant land and hard working people, the African origin peoples were taken as a means to build up the New World.…

    • 1125 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics