Preview

Mitsubishi Scandal in Normal, Illinois

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2126 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Mitsubishi Scandal in Normal, Illinois
BACKGROUND
In the mid-1990s, scandal rocked Mitsubishi, a conglomerate which consists of many autonomous companies, who manufacture myriad products. One of the largest of these corporations under the Mitsubishi name is Mitsubishi Motors, makers of many well-known automobiles, such as the Galant or Eclipse. Its North American branch, Mitsubishi Motors North America, was involved in one of the most significant sexual harassment cases in history.
In 1994, 24 women who worked at Mitsubishi’s Normal, Illinois plant accused Mitsubishi of allowing or even fostering a culture of widespread sexual harassment. Then, in 1996, a class-action lawsuit was filed by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), this time on behalf of around 300 women who worked at the Normal plant.
The male workers, who consisted of mainly American employees and managers, and Japanese managers, were accused of groping, verbally lewdly abusing, and even firing air guns between the legs of the female workers. Male employees and managers would go to parties away from work in which sexual acts were performed; the pictures from these parties (such as ones displaying oral sex being performed by employees and other inappropriate content) were set around the Normal plant.
After much difficulty both legally and in public relations, Mitsubishi was forced to settle each suit. In the first suit brought by the 29 women, the company agreed to pay out $9.5 million in 1997, while in the second brought by the EEOC, they were forced to give $34 million in 1998.
Mitsubishi, despite having had such significant accusations leveled against them, worked diligently to repair their system to avoid further incidents such as these. In the end, after having settled these suits, independent monitors hired by the EEOC to monitor Mitsubishi’s adherence to the settlement and adaptation of its practices lauded the company for its efforts. From the monitors’ final report: "Both Mitsubishi and EEOC should be extremely

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Lilly Ledbetter

    • 204 Words
    • 1 Page

    2003: Lilly Ledbetter sued her employer, and the federal jury awarded her $3.8 million in damages, which was later reduced by $3.5 million by a judge.…

    • 204 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Federal and state governments have enacted laws to protect against discrimination and sexual harassment in the work place yet employers continue to discriminate and violate employee 's right to work in a non-hostile environment. We have chosen Jenson v. Eveleth Taconite Company to examine class action status, discrimination and sexual harassment in the work place. This was the case first sexual harassment lawsuit to receive class action certification in 1988 defining the class “to include: all women who have applied for, or have been employed, in hourly positions...at any time since December 30, 1983” (U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit, 1997).…

    • 953 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Both the EEOC and a jury ruled in her favor, and Ledbetter prevailed and was awarded nearly $4 million dollars in pay and punitive damages, which the judge reduced to $360,000.…

    • 1002 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    2. In March of 1998, Ledbetter submitted a questionnaire to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) alleging sex discrimination against her employer. In July of 1998, she filed a formal EEOC charge against the company.…

    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Case Brief Meritor Sav

    • 356 Words
    • 2 Pages

    After being terminated a female bank employee filed an action under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C.S. §2000e et seq., claiming that she had been sexually harassed by her male supervisor. The US Supreme Court ruled that if the actions of the supervisor were unwelcome, than the respondent had a claim for sexual harassment on the basis of a hostile work environment, even if the sexual acts were voluntary.…

    • 356 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Search the Internet to find at least one news item about this lawsuit, preferably from a news source in the state in which the incident occurred.…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Green, K. A., Lopez, M., Wysocki, A., & Kepner. (2009). Diversity in the workplace: benefits, challenges, and the required managerial tools. Retrieved June 17, 2010 from http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/hr022…

    • 3691 Words
    • 106 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Title VII lawsuit by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) was a justified result of sexual harassment and mismanagement by Wal-Mart. Wal-Mart could have taken several steps within Human Resource (HR) policy to help deal with this incident, prevent further incidents, and ensure the defendant was properly employed in a safe environment [ (EEOC v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 2003) ].…

    • 1576 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Eeoc Paper

    • 1043 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The purpose of this paper is to go over a lawsuit that was filled by the United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. The paper will cover who the EEOC (Equal Employment Opportunity Commission) is and their role in the lawsuit. It will go over whether or not the lawsuit promotes social change. The paper will also go over how the EEOC as well as other news groups released information about the case to the public. I will then give my take on how I would implement new strategies to make sure the problem does not come up in the workplace again.…

    • 1043 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    BUSI 642 HR POLICY

    • 1403 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Sexual harassment is a great concern to organizations and if allowed to go unchecked can cost a company millions of dollars. According to Cabral, “in 1980 the Supreme Court said that sexual harassment was a breach of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. From the years 1978 to 1980, sexual harassment cases brought in opposition to companies costing them $189 million. This amount elevated to $267 million from 1985-1987” (p.16). Kubasek, N., & Brennan, B states…

    • 1403 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    2. Roberts, Barry S. and Mann, Richard A. Sexual Harassment in the Workplace: A Primer.…

    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Sexual harassment is always a legal topic in the work environment because the ramifications are so severe, but at the same time very abstract to describe what can constitute sexual harassment. This paper will take into consideration different elements of the law including Employment Law and cases tried before the U.S. Supreme Court. It will also offer suggestions for corrective action pertaining to the issue of sexual harassment in the workplace.…

    • 3269 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Theodore Roosevelt

    • 2844 Words
    • 7 Pages

    To depict the developments of sexual harassment over the last thirty years or so, it is important to look at how employment law has developed over the last number of centuries. From the late sixteen hundreds through the seventeen hundreds workers initiated the process of organizing groups to fight against barbaric employers. American workers have had to fight for their rights. Many states have an “at will” employment law. This type of labor law leaves many employees vulnerable. The government has passed a number of laws to assist employees. An example of this is Wisconsin enacting the first…

    • 2844 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lilly Ledbetter was one of the very few female supervisors at the Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. plant in Gadsden, Alabama, and she worked at that plant for nineteen years, from 1979 till her retirement in 1998. Initially, when she started working for the company, her pay was equal to that of the other male supervisors. However, as time passed the pay discrepancy between Ledbetter and her 15 male counterparts was stark: the lowest she received was $3,727 per month, while the lowest paid male received $4,286. Thus, after realizing this Mrs. Ledbetter filed an official complaint before the EEOC in March 1998, stating that Goodyear violated the Title VII as they paid her a discriminatory low salary due to her sex. After she filed an official complaint, her case went to trial, and the jury concluded that the pay disparity was due to intentional discrimination. However, the Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit reversed the jury verdict, as it claimed Mrs. Ledbetter’s’ case was not filed in time, as the original discriminatory pay decision occurred before the statutory limitations of 180 days.…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    At a subsiding workplace, a young female employee is assisting with closing up her section of a store. Going into the stock room alone, a fellow male worker corners her into a caged section of the area. Here, the male assistant makes unwanted physical and sexual advances towards the young and scared female worker. What can any person do who is subjected under these horrible workplace conditions that clearly violate their personal rights? As early as 1965, The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (or EEOC) has ensured the protection, promise and safety of those persons exposed to discrimination in disreputable workplaces (U.S. Equal…

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays