Preview

Miss

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
523 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Miss
BY: Tiarne Page
TOPIC: “Our adversary system of trial works very well. It cannot be improved.” Discuss this statement and indicate the extent to which you agree or disagree with it and justify your conclusion.
The adversary system of trial refers to the system used here in Australia, where two opposing parties prepare and present their case, in accordance with the strict rules of evidence and procedure, before an independent or impartial adjudicator. The adversary system aims to achieve fair and unbiased hearings, effective access to mechanisms for dispute resolution and timely resolution of disputes. Some aspects of the adversary system of trial work very well but there are certain aspects that can do with reform to further improve the adversary system. The adversary system of trial has five main features that add to the overall effectiveness such as the role of the parties, the role of the judge and the need for legal representation. In the adversary system of trial each party is in control and responsible for presenting their own case, with this comes great problems and strength to the case itself. A strength that is attached to the parties having control is that the truth is more likely to emerge, due to each party being empowered to present the strongest evidence and arguments to win their case. Having parties in control of preparing and presenting their case should increase party satisfaction with the legal system and the resolution achieved. However in attempt to win a case, parties may deliberately tamper or omit evidence that may impede the discovery of the truth. Furthermore a party with no or equivalent legal experience will be disadvantaged making it harder for the adversary system to reach a fair and unbiased hearing. The judges role in the adversary system of trial here in Australia is to remain independent and impartial throughout the entire court proceeding. Yet the judge ensures that the hearing or trial remains fair and unbiased by

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    As we walked into the jury room, after hearing the case of Commonwealth v. Miller, I had already decided how I would vote and, honestly, I determined I was not going to be swayed. We swiftly chose a foreman by appointing the one, who had been given the jury instructions, to that position. Next, we read the jury instructions out loud, in order to remember and understand the definition of each charge. Debate over the meaning of the instructions ensued for a short amount of time before we dove into determining guilt or innocence. Everyone was given a chance to discuss the case and, personally, I felt comfortable entering the discussion and debating the case. After discussion, we voted and were evenly split among guilty or not guilty. Next, we…

    • 661 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Explain why the adversary system of trial is the best system for achieving justice in criminal trials?…

    • 1021 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Unit 8 Writing Assignment

    • 1071 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The legitimacy of the criminal justice system is based largely upon both its effectiveness and its fairness. Its effectiveness is judged by its ability to investigate and detect crime, identify offenders and mete out the appropriate sanctions to those who have been convicted of offences. Its fairness is judged by its thoroughness and the efforts it makes to redress the resource imbalance between the accused and the state at the investigatory, pre-trial, trial and appellate stages. The system does this by providing evidentiary protection and effective legal representation at all points.…

    • 1071 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Specially, the unequal playing field legal actors and the accused are playing on when it comes to the truths about how they perceive, think and behave. As seen in previous chapters, money and race play a big role in the way individuals are tried, and these wealthy individuals are exploiting the weakness in our legal system. Adam Benforado suggest that this way, “If you are rich and connected, you go free. If you are poor and uneducated, you go to prison.” Will only add to the massive unfairness in our justice system. Accordingly, the use of trial consultants has also proved to be a negative for our justice system. Trial consultants collect information on the potential jury pool, discover any correlations that exist, and then target a sympathetic…

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Jury Trial

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Having a Jury Trial is known to be a part of the Adversarial System. Which is when exhibits, evidence, and witnesses are assembled by representatives of one side or the other to convince the fact finder that their side’s viewpoint is the truer one. Contrasted to that approach is the inquisitorial approach, used in mostly Europe. In this approach the Judge is given more control over the proceedings. The judge will interrogate the disputing parties and witnesses, referring frequently to a dossier that the court prepared. The Jury Trial is held to get a less biased decision and also a more truthful one. A trial gives attorneys more motivation to present the jury with all the evidence of the case, with a final goal of the jury ultimately…

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One can best describe the civil law system as an inquisition with both sides working together throughout the process with one goal in mind, to find the truth. One can describe the adversary system as a contest pitting adversaries against each other with one goal in mind, to win the case, and have their adversary lose the case. Although an attorney working under the adversary system of jurisprudence has an obligation to present truthful information to the courts, one has no general duty to promote truth, justice, or the other side’s interests. Again, the adversary system does not always render a result of truth, and innocent defendants may be subject to sanctions and punishments that are not equitable.…

    • 688 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Latimer Mock Trial

    • 378 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The rules of criminal procedure are highly significant to the defendants because they are designed to guarantee the constitutional rights and freedoms to those individuals charged with an offence. They serve to truly protect the victims, and ensure the guilty are brought to justice. In criminal trials, individuals in the jury wielded real power in the trial since they settle the fate of their fellow citizens by determining the defense is whether they are guilty of some of the most horrendous crimes. Being a member of the jury, my predominant responsibility in the mock trial was listening to the evidence presented by the Crown and the defense carefully. The jury was expected to examine all the evidence deliberately and make judgement without any bias. In order to make the discussion about the trial confidential, the jury were adjourned to the outside of the room to make a decision. An unanimous was made by the jury in order for a verdict to be reached. In this mock trial, the jury decided that Latimer shall be given a sentence of seven years. This decision made by the jury reflects the values and standards of the general public that Latimer do not deserve a more severe sentence. By bringing ordinary citizens into the court and placing them at the very heart of the decision-making process, trial by jury has become the most democratic part of the legal system. Furthermore, I experienced that the court uses witness testimony in an attempt to convince the jury beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant committed the offense. During cross-examination, the Crown and the defense asked questions trying to detect falsehood of the testimony or to destroy the credibility of the opponent’s witnesses. By asking questions connected to the witnesses’ characters, the defense…

    • 378 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    There are many strengths of the adversary system. Party control is the first strength of the system. The parties are in control of their own destinies. That is, they must prepare and present their own cases and accept the responsibility for the consequences. This is an extension of the basic democratic principle. Truth and conflicting interests is another strength. By giving the parties control over their own affairs, it is more likely that ‘great truths will energy from the powerful conflicting arguments’. Equality before the law is another strength. The parties to the dispute are treated equally before the law. This is a fundamental element of the rule of law. The system also respects the fundamental legal rights of the individual, such as the presumption of innocence, the right to remain silent and the right to present your own case. The judge in the adversary system is completely independent and impartial and cases are decided purely on their merits in accordance with law. Strict rules of evidence are also applied so that both parties have a fair and equal opportunity to put their cases and that only reliable and relevant evidence is allowed. The strict rules of procedure dictate that the trial is one continuous event and that the party making the allegation has the burden to prove it to a strict standard of proof that limits the possibility of a miscarriage of justice. That is, the prosecution must present its case first at the trial.…

    • 1225 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Jury selection is laid down in the Juries Act 1994. While it is proven that there are reasonable alternatives to a jury trial and that there is no doubt that jury trial is both time consuming and expensive when compared with trial by magistrates or by a judge alone, however the right to a jury trial shall not be dismissed so lightly. The anti jury lobby deems the jury system unpopular the importance of which is considered only overrated. I will be critically analysing whether trial by jury should be abolished in the UK legal system plus evaluating the advantages and disadvantages of the system.…

    • 2051 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Appellate Court

    • 404 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Many people tend to criticize our legal system for being too onerous. In our legal system, there is a three tiered court system in place of both State and Federal court system. Moreover, there is the intermediate court, also known as trial court, and there are the appellate or “higher” court. The higher courts are responsible for reviewing the verdicts that were previously made in the trial courts. However, when dealing with a trial court, the purpose is to handle civil matters. In this court, both sides represent their case, providing evidence to allow the court to gain a better understanding about what happened. In the trial court only one judge is present in the courtroom in which he is monitoring what evidence is or is not appropriate to be submitted during the trial. However, on the…

    • 404 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Adr V Litigation

    • 1927 Words
    • 8 Pages

    In prehistoric era, while humans have always had propensity to solve their differences by fighting, they have too recognized benefits of settling matters peacefully by flipping a coin/ some other way. With pursuit for alternatives to violence gave introduction to originator of alternative dispute resolution. The English trial is adversarial. That is to say it takes the form of a sort of battle between two (supposedly) equal parties.…

    • 1927 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Court Observation

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages

    • The main objective of the observation was to gain fresh knowledge on the proceedings of the litigated cases in …. Court. More specifically, the observation intended to identify the barriers and lackings in the system that hinders or delays the justice process.…

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Arbitration in Aus and Png

    • 1246 Words
    • 5 Pages

    4. Keane P, CJ, nd, ‘Judicial Support for Arbitration in Australia’, accessed on 18 May 2013 <.http://acica.org.au/assets/media/news/conferencepapers/The_Hon_Patrick_Keane_presentation_IDR_Conference.pdf>…

    • 1246 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Correspondence 66-64

    • 354 Words
    • 2 Pages

    It was a pleasure to meet you at the convention for trial attorneys in New York last week. In addition to the interesting program highlights of the regular sessions, the informal discussions with people like you are an added plus at these meetings. Your contribution to the program was very beneficial and highly informative.…

    • 354 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil Law

    • 1236 Words
    • 4 Pages

    For this assignment, in addition to answering the above questions, I would like you to find at least one case (which can be done most easily from Lexis) in which the limits of the adversary system were discussed or tested. The subject matter of the case itself can be anything, but the focus should be whether an attorney or firm's responsibility to a client or court outweighs some other "greater" or "moral" responsibility. For this case, please briefly discuss the ethical issue and how the court resolved it.…

    • 1236 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics