Preview

Misogyny of Richard III

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
293 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Misogyny of Richard III
Omens were signs of coming events, often regarded as a threat or warning. Duchess of York: Thou cam’st on earth to make the earth my hell’ act 4 scene 4.
For all its preoccupation with religionm dreams and the workings of fate, the play is a study in the harsh realities f power politics: what individual and social life is like under a despotic and brutal king ruling a deeply corrupt state. Exploiting the divisions cause by feuding political factions, and manipulating individuals and the system the cakculating Richard seizes the opportunity to make himself king. He is a Machiavellian figure who will stop at nothing to gain and maintain power.
Richard’s extraordinary facility with words enable him to manipulate, confuse,control and corrupt those around him → Woows lady anne, have Clarence thrown in prison, keep woodvills of his tracks, blame the king for clarences death…
Shakespear includes in the novel a great number of supernatural elements : margarets witchcraft, Clarence and Stanley prophetic dreams, the visit of the ghosts. These supernatural elements create and atmosphere of dread and heighten the sens that richard’s evil reign transforms England into a Gothic netherworld.
Richard deals extentively with the theme of political corruption

While the characters may have simply assumed that a deformity was a hateful act of God, the slightly more modern audiences of the play’s first performances may have regarded Richard’s III disability as either a demonological portrayal of corruption, or as part of the natural order of variation in the world. for Shakespeare, Richard's deformity stood for more than a warning of the evil deeds he would later commit; rather, it served as a symbol of Richard's innate “unnaturalness,” an outward sign of his inner

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    This difference is highlighted between Richard and looking for Richard through the reasons the audience seeks justice towards the character of Richard. The Shakespearean audience would hold the outlooks of Margaret from the beginning of the play as she states, "if heaven have any grievous plague in store exceeding those that I can wish upon thee o let them keep it till thy sins be ripe". Shakespeare encapsulates the tension created by Margaret’s curses in order to question whether justice is truly defined by man or god. The deviation from the iambic pentameter followed throughout the act exemplifies Margaret from the blind sited courts men within the room, ignorant towards Richard’s devious schemes. The omission of Margaret’s curses within the film and the omens present within the dream once more reflect the deflection from the religious traditions to address a more contemporary audience. The distinct emphasis on the psychological deterioration and conscience within character highlights before the murder of Clarence and the young princes stating, "Faith, some certain dregs of conscience are yet within me." Additionally, the hesitant manner of the murder conveys the role of our morality and personal beliefs in our action rather than those defined by…

    • 1231 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Texts are often a reflection of the society they embody: through awareness of context deeper levels of understanding can be developed and explored. By a comparative study of texts parallels in context can be established and evaluated, with the alternate visual mediums key in enhancing the audience experience. Al Pacino’s “Looking for Richard,” (1996) provides a more coherent view of William Shakespeare’s “Richard III,” (1592), using similarities between texts to accommodate a modern audience. Both texts represent common themes of war, demonstrating the inherent evil of mankind through characterisation, with respective societal influence affecting their portrayal. Shakespeare’s text strongly portrays the presence of propaganda in society, an influence still present in the context of 1996. Through the employment of the visual medium, Al Pacino is capable of displaying these influences to a postmodern audience, demonstrating the similarities in context and purpose.…

    • 962 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Intrinsic to both texts, there is the notion that art is used to directly influence and impact existing historical perceptions. Shakespeare’s “Richard III” explores this idea, using the most influential artistic medium of the time, theatre, to further publicise the ‘Tudor Myth’ perception. On stage, the visual motif of Richard’s appearance as “deformed, unfinished” reflects his moral deficiencies, reinforced by his soliloquys and asides that expose his underlying treachery. He forges a duplicitous role as both director and actor within the play, stating in the opening soliloquy “plots that I have laid, inductions dangerous…” Richard seemingly ‘stage manages’ the entirety of his world, creating a sense of dramatic irony from the juxtaposing of the different “masks” he feigns in contrast to his true intentions; he plays the role of the “grieving” brother, “Christian prince,” etc. As such, Richard’s meta-theatricality engages us on a psychological level that reinforces the perception of the Tudor Myth given not just the heinous nature of his crimes but the “villainous”…

    • 1036 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    to view Richard in different ways. It is from these different views of the same man, that one can draw…

    • 908 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    King Richard’s ability as an actor within a play explores how this type of villainy was entertaining in the era of Shakespeare. Richard’s evil is immediately established as his moral deformities are clearly embodied in his physical deformities. In justifying his premeditated meddling, he personifies war in his first soliloquy. ‘Grim visag’d war hath supported his wrinkled front’ and moved to caper ‘ nimbly in a lady’s chamber!’ Richard’s nature: ‘Deform’d, unfinished’ thus justifies his evil as he cannot participate in the war -lovemaking atmosphere. This was obviously a form of entertainment to the Shakespearean audience who had known of the war of the Roses and Richard’s deformities.…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Shakespeare depicts Richard’s duplicity through his soliloquies and asides as they reveal his multifaceted and deceptive nature. Richard’s oratory skills, whilst they are revealed to be witty, as he is shown to use intelligent word play, irony and stichomythia, he is ultimately cast as the Machiavellian character from the outset of the play “determined to play a villain”. Richard puts the blame on his appearance for the immoral acts he commits “deformed, unfinished, sent before my time” and uses it as an excuse to be power hungry. Richard’s duplicity is highlighted when his brother Clarence is sent to the tower to be murdered. Any sympathy elicited from the audience in the opening soliloquy is undermined immediately by the deeply…

    • 1317 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In The Deposition of Richard II, it is obvious that the English king was disliked by all. A list of his grievances was drawn up, citing all of his poor choices as king and the reasons why he should be dethroned. The number one cause of the hatred of him was “his evil rule, that is, he has given the goods and possession…

    • 1095 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout King Richard III, the value of kingship is one that is explored greatly. The play’s message about kingship is not only seen through Richard’s deceptive schemes but it is also through the fall of his reign where his conscience begins to show, resulting in the destruction of his power. Not only is Richard’s poor kingship seen through his own realization, but it is also seen through other character’s perception of Richard’s reign. Richard’s poor kingship can be seen through Richmond’s expression of Richard as ‘A base foul stone made precious by the foil of England’s chair, where he is falsely set.’ In this quote, Richmond metaphorically describes Richard as nothing more but a worthless rock only made to appear like a gem because of the throne in which falsely claims. It is through this metaphoric description of Richard as a worthless rock that we are able to comprehend what little skills Richard possesses as a king. The highlighting of Richard’s poor kingship not only helps us to comprehend his devious ways but also understand the importance of the value of kingship throughout one’s reign.…

    • 1382 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Through ‘The Tragedy of King Lear’, Shakespeare represents a distinctive voice in which influences the way we perceive the role of power play in our world as it broadens our understanding of the universality and complexity of power play. Compared with the 21st century film ‘Brassed Off’, we are presented with an insight into the various means of attaining power and its ability to uncover the true nature of people within their struggle for supremacy and control. Shakespeare presents 'The Tragedy of King Lear' as the struggle for power and the political and filial machinations that the desire for power can create. Shakespeare focuses the distinctive voice around the central character King Lear who represents a conceited oppressor whose fall from power prompts the downfall of the Kingdom that he once controlled. The main cause of his demise is his failure to understand and possess a clear vision of the people around him. In Lear's eyes, he sees his eldest daughter Goneril’s facade to be a loyal and true expression, 'Sir I love you more than word can wield the matter/Dearer than eyesight, space and liberty', although Lear's inability to see the truth results in his manipulation and the banishing of his loyal acquaintances; his youngest daughter Cordelia and his dear friend Kent. Although Lear can physically see, it is the understanding, awareness and direction that he lacks and is blind to. In contrast to Lear being physically capable of seeing, Gloucester becomes physically blind but gains the form of vision that Lear lacks, and consequently Gloucester evades a corollary comparable to Lear's. Here Shakespeare presents his distinctive voice on power play through the depiction of the manipulation and motivation behind the characters struggle for sovereignty. His clever use of his characters and their relationships allows us to gain an insight into the condition of the human psyche throughout their individual attempts at power and highlights the complexities associated…

    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The texts King Richard III and Looking for Richard both accept the centrality of power and the yearning for it, as a central plot driver and an assumed part of the human condition. However, each presents a different perspective as to the nature of power; its origins and morality.…

    • 2201 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    * Richard III – does conscience, acting and deception shape identity? Is Richard merely a creation of God’s divine will, or is he a cold hearted villain?…

    • 1297 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    King Richard III and Looking For Richard are compositional products that directly correlate to historical and social contexts respectively, the latter drawing on the former’s challenge to the context in which it was written. Shakespeare’s late sixteenth century play was crafted in a turbulent time of rigid political and religious adherence, and written under the weight of sectarian distrust and forced political alignment to the reigning Tudors. Thus, Shakespeare’s portrayal of Richard as a Yorkist focus’s on his devilish and Machiavellian nature. Written eight decades earlier, Niccolo Machiavelli’s The Prince asserts that an effective ruler should abandon traditional Christian virtues and morality to grow in power at any cost: ‘Politics have no relation to morals.’ This view of power and politics indicates a shift to a secular notion of leadership. Richard is, to a degree, a Machiavel; he calls himself a devil, ‘Thus like the formal Vice, Iniquity, I moralise two meanings in one word.’ (III.iii.82–83) This play is weighted with rigid historical context, but also challenges the notion of providentialism through Richard’s determination to ‘prove a villain.’ There is also a challenge in Pacino’s Looking for Richard for the modern audience, and…

    • 1685 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In KRII, Richard’s evil dual personality was an inconceivable concept to the Elizabethan audience. They viewed Richard as a renowned villain of history during the War of the Roses, and only as a villain within the play. This allowed no room for tragedy, as they did not sympathise with Richard. Richard’s villainy was also further emphasised in his physical deformity, hinting at the corruption of the mind. Richard is seen as the vice of morality plays, and an example of the Christian devil in how he acts and constantly reminds us that he is “…determined to prove a villain” [Act 1, Scene 1] in his soliloquies and asides.…

    • 1761 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Reflecting Elizabethan moral absolutes, Shakespeare acknowledges that a capacity for deception, manipulation and the quest for power is central to the human condition and clearly delineates the complex nature of evil in the character of Richard. Shakespeare dramatically portrays Richard’s villainous intentions and motivations to the Elizabethan audience in the opening soliloquy announcing- “he is made villain” to “usurp” the throne like a symbolic “usurping boar” being physically and morally “deformed” by his craving for power. Subsequently, Richard uses his guises as a tool for deception; he is a passionate lover desperately “wooing Lady Anne” yet a conniving murderer killing her husband, also ironically appearing to be a “loyal loving brother” by eradicating “George” himself. Shakespeare then reaffirms the results of human’s corruption and insatiability for power to the Elizabethan audience as he “proves a villain” must “fall prey to his” own “subtle and treacherous”…

    • 927 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    power

    • 1732 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Indeed power, justice, and greed are influencing factors that can alter the course of one’s life. These themes have been represented in the following texts, William Shakespeare Macbeth (play on stage) and William Golding’s lord of the flies (novel). The techniques employed are, symbolism, characterisation, language features, and violence/drama. Both authors employ a number of techniques to make both texts come to life vividly and more realistic and make the audience to consider they are a part of the texts.…

    • 1732 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays