Preview

Minority Disinvestment

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
353 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Minority Disinvestment
Minority Disinvestment
A minority disinvestment is one such that, at the end of it, the government retains a majority stake in the company, typically greater than 51%, thus ensuring management control.
Historically, minority stakes have been either auctioned off to institutions (financial) or offloaded to the public by way of an Offer for Sale. The present government has made a policy statement that all disinvestments would only be minority disinvestments via Public Offers.
Examples of minority sales via auctioning to institutions go back into the early and mid-90s. Some of them were Andrew Yule & Co. Ltd., CMC Ltd. etc. Examples of minority sales via Offer for Sale include recent issues of Power Grid Corp. of India Ltd., Rural Electrification Corp. Ltd., NTPC Ltd., NHPC Ltd. etc.
Majority Disinvestment
A majority disinvestment is one in which the government, post disinvestment, retains a minority stake in the company i.e. it sells off a majority stake.
Historically, majority disinvestments have been typically made to strategic partners. These partners could be other CPSEs themselves, a few examples being BRPL to IOC, MRL to IOC, and KRL to BPCL. Alternatively, these can be private entities, like the sale of Modern Foods to Hindustan Lever, BALCO to Sterlite, and CMC to TCS etc.
Again, like in the case of minority disinvestment, the stake can also be offloaded by way of an Offer for Sale, separately or in conjunction with a sale to a strategic partner.
Complete Privatization
Complete privatization is a form of majority disinvestment wherein 100% control of the company is passed on to a buyer. Examples of this include 18 hotel properties of ITDC and 3 hotel properties of HCI.
Disinvestment and Privatization are often loosely used interchangeably. There is, however, a vital difference between the two. Disinvestment may or may not result in Privatization. When the Government retains 26% of the shares carrying voting powers while selling the remaining

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Corp 2

    • 3330 Words
    • 14 Pages

    * C the acquisition by a corporation of substantially all of the property of another coorp in exchange for voting stock…

    • 3330 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    R: Yes. It is when several large companies are controlled by a single Board of Directors, known as a trust.…

    • 292 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The meaning of Privatization has been widely debated as the years progressed, however one idea scholastics and experts appear to concede to is; privatization is a relationship between a private- sector organization and an administration office with the end goal of finishing a venture that will benefit the pubic. Privatization relationships are the upfront of ideological, political and economic debates, they continue to be used as political tools to solve problems associated with increased demand for public services growing concerns with the size of government, and decreased opportunities for additional resources (MaNamara, Morris 2008). No one public private partnership is the same, each utilizing different arrangements and public management…

    • 211 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    General Purpose Government

    • 4287 Words
    • 18 Pages

    A)Citizens' equity?the amount that should be distributed to each citizen if the fund is liquidated.…

    • 4287 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    2006Gov Privatization Rprt

    • 10996 Words
    • 73 Pages

    Privatization 1 II. Forms of Privatization 1 III. Privatization around the World 3 IV. Reasons for Privatization 4…

    • 10996 Words
    • 73 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Lecture Note Week 12

    • 1272 Words
    • 6 Pages

     The company had some (foreign) institutional investors.  The company had a board with majority independence,…

    • 1272 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Many companies are controlled by single or a group of shareholders. This is particularly common in proprietary companies. In a majority-controlled company, minority shareholders face significant problem If the controllers run the company in their own interest or act unfairly discriminatory, unfairly prejudicial or oppressively. The Corporation Act provides effective procedures to enable members to obtain remedies in circumstances where the controllers of a company act oppressively or unfairly towards them.…

    • 1434 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The primary source of agency costs is the “separation of ownership and control” (Berle & Means, 1991), which becomes more apparent as the ownership of firm’s shares is wide spread and this is generally the case in large firms. To eliminate the agency costs and the agency problems, firms use minority share ownership plans as a way of monitoring because this reduces the gap between principal and agent…

    • 1761 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why the controversy? Privatisation is defined as the transfer of ownership rights in state-owned enterprises to the private sector. This type of activity has taken…

    • 158 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Finance

    • 5399 Words
    • 22 Pages

    References: Bertoncelj, A. (2006) “Corporate restructuring and controlling interest”, Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai, Oeconomica, Vol. 51, No.1, pp. 59-73.…

    • 5399 Words
    • 22 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The usual condition for a controlling financial interest is ownership of a majority voting interest, and, therefore, as a general rule ownership by one entity, directly or indirectly, of more than 50 percent of the outstanding voting shares of another entity is a condition pointing toward consolidation. However, there are exceptions to this general rule. A majority-owned entity shall not be consolidated if control does not rest with the majority owner (for instance, if the entity is in legal reorganization or in bankruptcy or operates under foreign exchange restrictions, controls, or other governmentally imposed uncertainties so severe that they cast significant doubt on the parent’s ability to control the entity).…

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    and debt avoidance, (2) a reorganisation of ownership with the risk of unfair and discriminatory treatment of shareholders, and (3) a transfer of shares which may lead…

    • 13296 Words
    • 54 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Corporate Finance

    • 761 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Which one of the following is a means by which shareholders can replace company management?…

    • 761 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Managerial Finance Case

    • 1746 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The NPV concept of America shows that they believe share holders to be the only stakeholders.…

    • 1746 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Currently, we are exposed to hear or watch several times in the radio or TV news important political people talking about reforms, which is sometimes only a cover way of talking about privatization of previously public services now and again. Defined in the strictest of terms, privatization means the sale of public utilities to private concerns. But as Public Works magazine noted, "in the broader sense of the term …and the definition that applies to most contemporary discussions, privatization is the contract operation of a public utility or service by a private entity. It most often occurs in solid waste management, water/wastewater treatment, fleet maintenance, road/bridge building and maintenance, and municipal management."…

    • 880 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays