Military service debate:
Restore military service was the topic of the debate, government a team of two member, comprised of Mr x as Prime minister and Mr y as minister, versus opposition another team of two member, comprised of Mr w as leader and Mr z as deputy,. Each member of two teams was given tree minutes to argue and defend their side. The debate took place the 27th September, Mr Chr head the chair position With K as time Keeper. The government support the motion by some arguments like: a step to begin a man; good experiment; family linked, social interest; a way to travel; done a lot of activity such as pass driving license, fire a gun, make a parachute jump, assault course; another argument was also to protect the country and improve respect. The opposition raises some drawbacks and the big one was it become mandatory and it create blank in studies and by the way it can create a lot of problems. in my humble opinion the military service should be optional, not compulsory!
Military Service is a course to create a fit and capable citizen with strong characters. For that reason we see that the majority of world countries obligate the young people to attend of the military service. Should men compulsory attend the military service? Are there any advantages or disadvantages of it?
Supporters say that the military service is a very practical course through which young people would attend to learn a wide range of skills physically, morally an even psychologically. Parents at home can’t offer their children all the principles that are needed for them to face the tough life bravely, wisely and steadily. But military service can offer a wide variety of programs through certain strategies developed by specialists to attain these noble goals.
Contrary to that, the army requires individuals to fit into its pattern, or otherwise draftees become an object of ridicule among the others. Many sensitive young...