Mgmt1001 Assignment 1

Only available on StudyMode
  • Download(s) : 65
  • Published : May 22, 2013
Open Document
Text Preview
MGMT1001 Assignment 1 ESSAY Feedback s1 2013

Weighting: 15% of total course assessment

Student Name| |
Date Received| 12-2-2013| Student No.| |

Criteria| O| S| U| Mark|
Development of a consistent, clear and well-supported answer to the question| | | | /35%| Overall quality of analysis, thinking in terms of the key themes and issues raised in the question| | | | /35%| Quality of academic research|

* Appropriate number of references sourced from appropriate journals/ databases| | | | /10%| * Relevance of sources to your argument| | | | |
Appropriate structure (introduction, body, conclusion),| | | | /5%| Clarity of expression & grammar| | | | /5%|
Correct format of in-text citations and bibliography using Harvard style| | | | /5%| Appropriate document formatting as per requirements on page 11 of the Course Outline and length (1,000 words +/- 10%)| | | | /5%| O = Outstanding; S = Satisfactory; U = Unsatisfactory

Penalty(ies) applied: ……| |
TOTAL| %|
General Comments: |

Criteria| Outstanding| Satisfactory| Unsatisfactory|
Development of a consistent, clear and well-supported answer to the question| Identifies the issue/ problem with clarity, accuracy and precision Marks: 26.5 - 35| Demonstrates an understanding of the primary question/ issue/ problemMark: 17.5 - 26| No demonstrated evidence of an understanding of the question, or identifies a ‘different’ issueMark: 0 - 17| Overall quality of analysis, thinking in terms of the key themes and issues raised in the question| Logical analysis and evaluation of arguments, theory and information. Insightful analysis shows depth of understanding and development of own ideas.Marks: 26.5 - 35| Description of theory and informationMark: 17.5 - 26| Little to no discussion of relevant theory and information.Mark: 0 - 17| Quality of academic research|

* Appropriate number of references sourced from appropriate journals/ databases| Demonstrated use of 5 – 6 sources comprised of: * At least 2 references from ‘starting references list’ * 2-4 additional academic sources from prescribed databases | Demonstrated use of 4 sources comprised of: * 2 references from ‘starting references list’ * 2 additional academic sources from prescribed databases| Use of less than 2 sources from the ‘starting references’ list AND/OR less than 2 additional academic sources from prescribed databases | * Relevance of sources to your argument| Selection of additional sources appropriate to the student’s argument.| Selection of additional sources appropriate to the essay question.| Additional sources are irrelevant.| | Mark: 7.5 - 10| Mark: 5 -7| Mark: 0 - 4.5|

Appropriate structure (introduction, body, conclusion),| Text is well-structured and coherent, with a clear and effective introduction and conclusion; body is logically sequenced with clear transitions between parts; paragraphs are well-developed.Mark: 4 - 5| Text is structured with an introduction and conclusion and body with clearly defined parts, although these could be developed more effectively / be more coherent. Transition between paragraphs could be improved.Mark: 2.5- 3.5 | Text poorly structured; introduction and/or conclusion not clear or effective; body not clearly structured; paragraphs/sections not well-developed; ineffective transitions between paragraphs, use of lists/ bullet points.Mark: 0 - 2| Clarity of expression and grammar| No spelling mistakes, absence of contractions, appropriate academic tone, well constructed paragraphsMark: 4 - 5| Some spelling mistakes and rare use of contractions, ‘informal’ tone – inappropriate / informal word choice, such as “text” language, spelling, or slang; appropriate paragraph structureMark: 2.5- 3.5| Multiple spelling mistakes, extensive use of contractions, poor sentence construction, ‘informal’ tone –...
tracking img