Method Acting

Only available on StudyMode
  • Download(s): 160
  • Published: January 1, 1996
Read full document
Text Preview
There are many diverse methods and approaches to acting , each actor uses the

things he has learned and creates his own unique way of playing and interpreting a role.

Using the things he has learned, he can find his own weaknesses and strong points and

therefore creating this method that belongs to him only. But before the actor can learn his

own method, he must study many other methods to the approach of acting. There are

many different methods of acting.

One of the many methods is called presentational acting. When using this

approach, an actor will study his character and 'present' the character by mimicking the

actions this character would make, along with the character's speech, tones, gestures, and

mannerisms. Sometimes an actor using this method will actually 'feel' the character's

emotions. An actor must develop this character during the rehearsal's so that he can

reproduce the same effects for the performance and know how to stay focused and remain

in control of the characters actions and knowing what to expect. This method requires

much attention to voice and movement, the major tools used in this method.

Another method is called representational acting. In this method, the actor

actually tries to put himself in the character's place, feeling what the character would feel,

and experiencing his thoughts and emotions. Even though movement is important in this

method, more emphasis is put on the actual feelings and emotions, as though you really

were in this character's place. Internal portrayal is very important while portraying a

character using this method.

In contrasting the two methods, it comes down to the fact that when using

representational acting, an actor uses the psychological feelings and emotions of the

character; in presentational acting, an actor uses the gestures, words, and mannerisms,

portraying the external characteristics of a role. Both methods present the truth in each

character, both observations of nature, and both breathe life into a character on stage.

The goals are the same for both methods, that is to make the character become alive on

the stage, to let the audience experience the features of the character and really know who

the character is. These methods differ only in the way that they make it happen.

Presentational acting mimics what it sees in nature, while representational tries to recreate

what has happened.

While each approach to acting is just as good as the other, many people argue

about which is superior. Some people say that a person who acts using the presentational

method would be suited better in portraying a period play, while an representational actor

would be better off in a modern play. Then you find an presentational actor saying that he

can portray a modern character, just as a representational actor says that he can do period

plays. It seems that there are many opinions surrounding the abilities of the actors of each

method.

An actor will take things that he likes from different methods and discard what he

doesn't like until he can come up with his own system of acting. While it helps to know

different kinds of techniques, an actor must take much time to study each, for an actor will

become confused by throwing different methods together at once. An analogy of this

would be it you had a beginning painter and you taught him how to apply paint several

different ways all at one time, there would be an odd mixture of strokes, taking away from

the true idea of the painting. One must take there time in order to create the perfect

method for themselves.

While the aim of all actors is the same, the approach is different for each actor.

There goal is to put on a performance where the audience will believe the story and

become involved. This does put on a problem though, unlike other types of artists, actors

cannot just do what they...
tracking img