Preview

Merit and demerit of nuclear power station

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
446 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Merit and demerit of nuclear power station
GENERAL ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF NUCLEAR POWER GENERATION

DISADVANTAGES:

1. Nuclear power is a controversial method of producing electricity. Many people and environmental organisations are very concerned about the radioactive fuel it needs.
2. There have been serious accidents with a small number of nuclear power stations. The accident at Chernobyl (Ukraine) in 1986, led to 30 people being killed and over 100,000 people being evacuated. In the preceding years another 200,00 people were resettled away from the radioactive area. Radiation was even detected over a thousand miles away in the UK as a result of the Chernobyl accident. It has been suggested that over time 2500 people died as a result of the accident.
3. There are serious questions to be answered regarding the storage of radioactive waste produced through the use of nuclear power. Some of the waste remains radioactive (dangerous) for thousands of years and is currently stored in places such as deep caves and mines.
4. Storing and monitoring the radioactive waste material for thousands of years has a high cost.
5. Nuclear powered ships and submarines pose a danger to marine life and the environment. Old vessels can leak radiation if they are not maintained properly or if they are dismantled carelessly at the end of their working lives.
6. Many people living near to nuclear power stations or waste storage depots are concerned about nuclear accidents and radioactive leaks. Some fear that living in these areas can damage their health, especially the health of young children.
7. Many Governments fear that unstable countries that develop nuclear power may also develop nuclear weapons and even use them.

ADVANTAGES:

1. The amount of electricity produced in a nuclear power station is equivalent to that produced by a fossil fuelled power station.
2. Nuclear power stations do not burn fossil fuels to produce electricity and consequently they do not produce damaging, polluting

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Over centuries humans have always continued to try and find new ways of converting one form of energy into one which humans can manipulate for their own use. One of the most recent forms of converting energy, which is gaining in popularity is nuclear energy. With 14 percent of the world using it today it is a viable alternative to burning fossil fuels. To give you a basic idea on how the process of converting energy works according to the Canadian Nuclear Association is as basic as, “splitting the uranium atom to generate the heat that is used to produce steam for the production of electricity”(www.cna.ca). However things do not always run so smoothly, and the leakage of the nuclear material could have devastating consequences to both the land and its inhabitants. One of the bigger well know events of this nature, came from the power plant Chernobyl. To put simply it is a plant that exploded releasing nuclear waste into the atmosphere. Although this is detrimental to the environment the significance behind this event is because of this accident, we have now learned from our mistakes and are taking more precautions so that history is not repeated. I will prove that history will not be repeated through some background knowledge of the plant, what happened during the meltdown and how it effected the land and inhabitants, and finally what insight we have gained from this event and its significance to history.…

    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nuclear power is produced through the use of nuclear reactions to produce nuclear energy that can then be harnessed to generate heat and create superheated steam to drive turbines. The most common nuclear reaction is that of nuclear fission, which is the splitting of an atom’s nucleus into smaller nuclei. Nuclear reactions are incredibly energy dense and thus allow nuclear reactors to make a tremendous amount of electricity. There are only 61 nuclear power plants in the United States, but they account for 19 percent of the entire country’s electricity production. [8][14] There are 7,304 total power plants in the United States, so nuclear plants on average produce over twenty-eight times as much energy as another plant in the U.S.…

    • 730 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    There are numerous advantages of nuclear power; the purity of the energy manufacturing process is one of them. While nuclear energy is not pollutant free, it also does not emit nearly the amount of pollutants as various fossil fuel energies. Nuclear power plants do not release air emissions, such as carbon dioxide, but the necessary process of mining for uranium does. This is, arguably, the most essential feature of substituting fossil fuels with nuclear power. The incineration of fossil fuels has greatly contributed to the global warming problems we are having today. In 2010 alone, approximately 5,800 million metric tons of carbon dioxide was released into the atmosphere. (EPA, 2010.) Nuclear power can assist our modern society in continuing our lifestyles, while still relieving the atmosphere of the massive amount of pollutants that are bequeathed on to it consistently.…

    • 1186 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Weapons proliferation: o Enrichment of reactor-­‐grade uranium can be weapons grade o Reprocessing more efficient but plutonium useful for nuclear weapons o Disposal pools and dry casks susceptible to attack 3.) Safety: once “glamorous reactors” now dreaded • Three-­‐Mile Island (1979 4.) Storage of radioactive wastes o Need to store and secure spent nuclear fuel for 10,000 to 250,000 years!…

    • 7330 Words
    • 249 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    labouring the Walmart way

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In addition, nuclear reaction can generate radioactive waste. These wastes are very dangerous, and have very high radiation. Moreover, radioactive waste is hard to recycle and store. Radioactive waste are usually buried in the deep ground or seabed. Not only such, these wastes are hard to degrade. For example, uranium-235 needs 7 hundred million years to degrade.…

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Nuclear energy leads to an unsafe, unstable and unclean environment. The producing of nuclear energy can lead to both good and bad things, but two thing that come with producing nuclear energy are the high dangers and expenses. Many risks and high dangers of producing nuclear energy are any where from health issues to major meltdowns of nuclear plants. Expenses of nuclear energy plants are very expensive to build and to sustain them through the years. Renewable energy is a safer option for the environment and the economy, with no chances of major melt downs and expenses.…

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nuclear power does not put out green house gasses, nuclear power does not pollute our water, and unlike some people believe nuclear power does not release toxic gasses into the air. Some people believe that it produces toxic gases into the air because they see the white clouds that come out of the top of the power plant cooling towers, but in fact those white clouds are actually just the water vapor that has been used to cool the systems, it is not toxic and therefore does not pollute the air. Nuclear energy uses either plutonium or uranium, depending on the type of the reactor. Nuclear reactors produce less waste than any other type of energy source. One pound of plutonium can produce the same amount of energy as 50,000 barrels of oil. The number of deaths caused by coal powered plants is about 24,000 a year. There were only 56 direct deaths caused by the Chernobyl reactor meltdown. Fukushima had no direct deaths, and the only other reported deaths were of the 3 men who were testing a portable reactor in Arco, Idaho. Arco was also the very first city in the world to be powered by nuclear…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Taubes, Gary. “Whose Nuclear Waste?” Technology Review 105.1 (2002): 60-68. InfoTrac Custom Journals. Web. 2 Dec. 2009.…

    • 2071 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Nuclear Power Greenpeace argues that there is nothing ‘peaceful’ about the nuclear industry. It is harmful to the environment as well as all living creatures. The Nuclear Age began in 1945 and ever since Greenpeace began, they have been trying to fight it. There has been much progress made. In 2000 nuclear powerful was discredited during the UN Climate Change talks. In 2001 the UN Sustainability Development Conference declared nuclear as an unsustainable technology.…

    • 151 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    With nuclear power came what was thought to be a more clean alternative to burning coal and other fossil fuels; Nuclear power does not produce nearly as much of the greenhouse gases as coal produces. People and society have given nuclear power a bad name, considering the amount of accidents that have happened. Although when you look at statistics it’s not as many as you would believe, or expect. When nuclear power is put head to head with coal power, nuclear power is the more efficient, and the safest way of power production. There are several reasons for this like the amount of fuel burned, pollution levels, and the effect it has on the environment.…

    • 1108 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This powerful energy was found by William Rontgen in 1895. The energy released by the nucleus is used in the production of nuclear reactors which perform variety of functions. The nuclear reactors are used to boil water at a very high temperature within a specified period of time to use for industrial and production purposes. That water is also used to activate the turbine that is present in the shaft of a generator. The nuclear energy is powerful because helps in production of heat and electricity is larger quantities. It is a form of energy that does not directly create air pollution like combustion of coal or release of petroleum products produces. Nuclear energy is a source of power and may be used in the future as a means of substitute because it is free from pollution. There are many advantages of nuclear energies which the other form of energies cannot provide. Although it releases energy it does not inject any harmful gases like carbon dioxide, sulfur dioxide , carbon monoxide etc that is hazardous to environment. It does not constitute in the rise of global warming which the other form of energies do. When nuclear energy is being produced many area of the land is not occupied. Many natural resources are not exploited while producing the power. The energy is released by radiation does not specifically cause any harm to the environment and living creatures…

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    By building nuclear reactors which contains the nuclei, the large of energy released from it creates steam which drives machines to generate electric power. Nuclear energy is capable of producing energy equivalent to 3 million pounds of coal from 1 pound of uranium. however, after the nuclear plant disasters that happened in Chernobyl in Ukraine and Fukushima in Japan led people to a controversy on nuclear energy and questions such as whether nuclear energy and reactors can solve the world’s energy issues or does it pose to much of a risk and should be taken out as a choice of energy. After looking through the issue more, I have came up with the question: To what extent do the benefits of nuclear energy outweigh the possible risks it has on the environment? After doing research, my position in this controversy is pro nuclear. I believe that the benefits of nuclear energy are higher than the threats and after looking at statistics, it had shown that other sources of energy causes the same or more damage to our environment with less good…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The problem of radioactive waste is still an unsolved one. The waste from nuclear energy is extremely dangerous and it has to be carefully looked after for several thousand years (10'000 years according to United States Environmental Protection Agency standards).…

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are two main types, low-level waste and high-level waste. This waste can be disposed, stored, or decontaminated. Sites for disposing are dwindling and can be insufficient. There are no setups for permanent disposal of high-level waste in the United States, and there are about eight low-level waste national disposal facilities yet around four of these actually receive waste. Additionally, there are no national repository sites. In the early 2000s, Yucca Mountain was appointed as a repository site for high-level waste and spent fuel rods, but its price was 300 million dollars from the federal government and billions from taxpayers. Yucca Mountain never became a repository site. Underground storage can also lead to contamination of groundwater which can impact humans and the environment’s food chain. Furthermore, decontamination results in even more low-level wastes and uses large amounts of water. If the waste goes untreated, though, exposure to the waste can be harmful to people. Radioactive waste and its various treatments are negative effects of nuclear…

    • 412 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The use of nuclear energy should be allowed to continue for many reasons such as nuclear energy is cleaner and safe when handled properly. An example of where nuclear energy is cleaner than other forms of energy such as coal-burning is in how the energy or heat is produced in the plants. In nuclear power plant the energy or heat it produced by the fission of Uranium; in a coal-burning plant the burning of coal produces the energy or heat. The Uranium power plant does not produce the soot and harmful gasses, such as CO2, that the coal-burning plant does. Also, nuclear power plants are cleaner because very little fuel is needed to create a lot of energy; and there is no air pollution like there is with a coal-burning…

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays