November 7, 2014
Biology 111-J3
Predicting Patterns of Inheritance Using Monohybrid and Dihybrid Crosses
Introduction
This experiment was on Mendelian Inheritance; which is the inheritance of biological features that are based on the rules proposed my Mendel. The purpose of this experiment was to show how to predict patterns of inheritance by using Punnett Squares to perform monohybrid and dihybrid crosses. Two crosses were performed. Cross one consisted of heterozygous alleles crossed with another set of heterozygous alleles. Cross number two consisted of a set of homozygous dominant and homozygous recessive alleles. Completing the monohybrid and dihybrid crosses using Mendel’s Punnett Square system allows the results for the possible gametes to be viewed by the different alleles being crossed.
Methods and Materials
Blue Beads
Green Beads
Red Beads
Yellow beads
(2) 100 mL Beakers
Permanent Marker
Using the permanent marker, label one 100 mL beaker as “1” and the second beaker as “2”. Count out 50 yellow and 50 blue beads and pour them into “Beaker 1”. Stir the beads to make sure there is an even distribution of both throughout the beaker, or a homogenous mixture. Now pour 50 red and 50 green beads into “Beaker 2” and create another homogeneous mixture. Here are assumptions to be made about the experiment thus far; Beaker 1 contains either yellow or blue beads; Beaker 2 contains either red or green beads; both beakers contain approximately the same number of each colored bead; these colors correspond to the following traits (Y/y is color of kernel color, S/s is for smooth/wrinkled seed). Yellow: (Y) vs. Blue (y). Green (G) vs. Red (g). Without looking pull 2 beads out of Beaker 1. This will be the genotype for the parents of Individual Number 1 for the upcoming generation. Record your results for this in “Table 1: Parent Genotypes: Monohybrid Crosses”. Now repeat this procedure for Individual Number 2 and record the results. Repeat this four more times and return the beads to their corresponding beakers (a total of 5 subsequent generations should be completed at this point). Without looking, remove two beads from Beaker One and two beads from Beaker Two. These beads will be representing the genotype of Individual Number 1. Record the new information into “Table 3: Parent Genotypes: Dihybrid Crosses”. Repeat this step to create the genotype for Individual Number 2 and record the results in Table 3 again. Determine what the possible genotypes could come out to be if each individual had gametes. Record these possibilities in “Table 4: Generation Data Produced by Dihybrid Crosses”. Now, to prove the possibilities, create a Punnett square and determine the genotypes and phenotypes for this type of cross. Repeat this step 4 additional times for a total outcome of 5 subsequent generations
Results
Y-Yellow
y-Blue
G-Green
g-Red
These are the results for the randomly chosen beads for the parent genes.
Table 1:Parent Genotypes: Monohybrid Crosses
Generation
Genotype of Individual 1
Genotype of Individual 2
P
Yy
Yy
P1
YY
Yy
P2
Yy
YY
P3
YY
yy
P4
Yy
Yy
These are the results received once the parent genes were crossed. Yellow was obviously dominant over the blue with only a total of 2 blue and 18 yellow.
Table 2: Generation Data Produced by Monohybrid Crosses
Parents
Possible Offspring Genotypes
Possible Offspring Phenotypes
Genotype Ratio
Phenotype Ratio
P
YY, Yy, Yy, yy
3-Yellow
1-Blue
1:2:1
3:1
P1
YY, YY, Yy, Yy
4-Yellow
2:2
1:0
P2
YY, YY, Yy, Yy
4-Yellow
2:2
1:0
P3
Yy, Yy, Yy, Yy
4-Yellow
1:0
1:0
P4
YY, Yy, Yy, yy
3-Yellow
1-Blue
1:2:1
3:1
These are the results for the possible phenotype and genotypes produced with the monohybrid cross.
Table 3: Parent Generations: Dihybrid Crosses
Generation
Genotype of Individual 1
Genotype of Individual 2
P
YYGg
YyGg
P1
YyGG
YyGg
P2
Yygg
YYGg
P3
YYGg
yyGg
P4
YyGG
Yygg
These are the results for the dihybrid crosses with Yellow/Green being dominant.
Table 4: Generation Data Produced by Dihybrid Crosses
Parents
Possible Offspring Genotypes
Possible Offspring Phenotypes
Genotype Ratio
Phenotype Ratio
P
YYGg, YyGg, YYgg, Yygg
2-Yellow/Green
2-Yellow/Red
1:2:1
2:2
P1
YYGG, YyGG, YyGg, yygG
3-Yellow/Green
1-Blue/Green
1:1:1:1
3:1
P2
YYGg, YyGg, Yygg, Yygg
2_Yellow/Green
2-Yellow/Red
1:1:1:1
2:2
P3
YyGG, YyGg, YyGg, Yygg
3-Yellow/Green
1-Yellow/Red
1:2:1
3:1
P4
YYGg, YyGg, YyGg, yyGg
3-Yellow/Green
1-Blue/Green
1:2:1
3:1
These are the genotypic and phenotypic results for the dihybrid cross with Yellow/Green being dominant.
Monohybrid Crosses
Y y Y Y
Y y Y
YY
Yy
Y
YY
YY
Y YY Yy y Yy
Yy
y
Yy
Yy
Y YY Yy
P
P1
P2
Y
Y
Y y y Yy
Yy
Y YY Yy
y Yy Yy
y Yy yy
P3
P4
Dihybrid Crosses
YG yg YG yG Yg yg YG
YYGG
YyGg
YG
YYGG
YyGG
YG YYGg YyGg yg YyGg
Yygg
yg
YyGg
yyGg
Yg YYgg Yygg
P
P1
P2
YG
Yg
YG yG yG YyGG
YyGg
Yg YYGg YyGg
yg YyGg Yygg
yg YyGg yyGg
P3
P4
Discussion
“Table 1:Parent Genotypes: Monohybrid Crosses” showed the results of when just 2 different alleles were crossed. The dominant trait was Yellow. The ratio of Yellow to Blue was 19:1 in the monohybrid cross. “Table 3: Parent Generations: Dihybrid Crosses” showed the possibility of 4 alleles being crossed. The possible results were Yellow/Green, Yellow/Red, Blue/Green, and Blue/Red with the dominant trait for the dihybrid cross being Yellow/Green. The ratio for all present phenotypes was 14:3:2:1. “Table 2: Generation Data Produced by Monohybrid Crosses” showed the genotype and phenotype ratio of each allele when crossed and all of the possible gene combinations for the monohybrid cross. The dominant trait was Yellow with the ratio of Yellow to Blue being 18:2. “Table 4: Generation Data Produced by Dihybrid Crosses” showed the genotype and phenotype ratio and all of the possible gene combinations for the dihybrid cross. The possible results for this cross were Yellow/Green, Yellow/Red, Blue/Green, and Blue/Red with the dominant trait being Yellow/Green. The phenotypic ratio for this dihybrid cross was 13:5:2:0.
Bibliography
eScience Labs, n.d. November 15, 2014. http://esciencelabs.com
The Josiah Macy, Jr Foundation, Johann Gregor Mendel (1822-1884) Father of Genetics. n.d. Novemeber 15, 2014. http://www.dnaftb.org/1/bio.html
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
2. Use the Punnett square to determine the genotypes in the progeny of each of the…
- 1647 Words
- 7 Pages
Good Essays -
5. Based on the data obtained, is the most likely mode of inheritance in Case 2 autosomal or sex–linked? Explain.…
- 356 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
1. Simulate Mendel’s experiments using a dihybrid cross, in which he defined the law of independent assortment. Use two physical traits in dragons – Color and body covering. The color locus has two alleles: Green (G) which is dominant, and yellow (g) which is recessive. The skin locus also has two alleles: Scaled (S) is dominant to scaleless (s).…
- 667 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
B is dominant to b, so offspring with either the BB or Bbgenotype will have the purple-flower phenotype. Only offspring with the bbgenotype will have the white-flower phenotype. Therefore, in this cross, you would expect three out of four (75 percent) of the offspring to have purple flowers and one out of four (25 percent) to have white flowers. These are the same percents that Mendel got in his first experiment.…
- 1483 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
2. What effect, if any, does this have on the results produced and your ability to perform chi-square analysis on these data? If any of your crosses do not follow an expected pattern of inheritance, provide possible reasons to account for your results.…
- 688 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
This lab was the study of monohybrid as well as dihybrid crosses. A monohybrid cross is the study of a certain trait whereas a dihybrid cross is the study of the mating experiment between two organisms that are identically hybrid for two traits. ( Reference 1 ) This lab was done to determine the genetic mutations after each generation and to observe the ratios. As each generation of fruit flies came to existence, traits would either be different from each fly or certain traits would disappear from existence. The expected ratio for a monohybrid cross was 3:1 and 9:3:3:1 for the dihybrid cross. For the monohybrid cross, eye color was observed to be wildtype, dark red, or white eyed, which was x-linked. (Reference 2) As for the dihybrid cross, both wing shape as well as eye color was observed. The wings were either straight, wildtype, or shriveled, vestigial, depending on…
- 1270 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
Gregor Mendel is an Australian monk, who worked in a garden at a monastery. He experimented with pea plants, and soon became known as the father of genetics. The reason he studied pea plants was because they grow quickly, the traits can be easily observed, and the plant is easy to pollinate. Mendel’s method was to control the pollination of the pea plants and create offspring’s of the two plants that were pollinated together. Using self-pollination and cross pollination, Mendel was able to select plants that had specific traits and observe the traits that appeared in their offspring. The F1 generation is the offspring that is a cross between two parents. The F2 generation is the offspring that is a cross between two individuals in the same F1 generation. A dominant factor is the dominating factor, and the one that masks the effect of the recessive factor for the same characteristic. A recessive factor is one whose effect is taken over by the dominant factor for the same characteristic. Basically, a trait that is controlled by a recessive factor would not appear when paired with a trait controlled by a dominant factor.…
- 292 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Use of Punnett Square - a grid used to determine the possible genotypes, and thus resulting phenotypes of offspring. Utilizes the alleles of both parents.…
- 524 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
They thought Mendel’s hereditary determinants were on a locus. They found out that the physical separation of alleles during anaphase I of meiosis accounts for Mendel’s principle of segregation. If the alleles for different genes are located on different chromosomes, they assort independently from one another in meiosis I. This confirmed the principle of independent assortment. Later on, the two scientists came up with the chromosome theory of inheritance, which states that independent assortment happens in metaphase and anaphase of meiosis I. To test the theory of inheritance, scientist Thomas Hunt Morgan used the fruit fly. At one point, Morgan noticed that a male fruit fly had white eyes rather than the wild type red eyes. He concluded that the white eyes resulted from a mutation. He mated a red-eyed female with a mutant white-eyed male and the results showed that all of the F_1 females had red eyes, but the F_1 males had white eyes. This was very peculiar because Mendel already proved that traits are not sex based. Morgan realized that the X chromosome in males and females explained his results. He determined that eye color is carried on the X chromosome and not on the Y chromosome. This is described as sex-linked inheritance. According to the X-linkage hypothesis, a female has two copies of the eye color gene because they have the two X chromosomes, whereas the male fruit flies have the one X chromosome that codes for eye color. The reciprocal cross of pea plants happened on non-sex chromosomes called autosomes. Genes on non-sex chromosomes show autosomal inheritance. Biologists now know that Boveri’s and Sutton's chromosome theory of inheritance was…
- 600 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Introduction: The purpose of this lab is to apply Mendel’s laws to predict the probability of the occurrence of a single event, of two independent events and of certain traits in offspring of parents exhibiting traits. Gregor Mendel was an Austrian monk in 1866, who studied how traits were passed using pea plants. From his studies of inheritance, he created three laws of inheritance: the law of dominance, the law of segregation, and the law of independent assortment. He called genes ‘’factors’’ and believed the controlled every trait. The law of dominance states that the dominant gene prevents the appearance of the recessive gene.…
- 1175 Words
- 5 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Famers and herders have been selectively breeding their plans and animals to produce more useful hybrids for thousands of years. It was somewhat of a hit or miss process since the actual mechanisms governing inheritance were unknown. Knowledge of these genetic mechanisms finally came as a result of careful laboratory breeding experiments carried out over the last century and a half. A contributing geneticist named Gregor Mendel (1822-1884), discovered through his research the basic underlying principles of heredity that also applied to humans and other animals. Mendel discovered that certain traits show up in offspring without any blending of parent traits. This observation that these parental traits do not show up in offspring plants with intermediate forms was critically important because the leading theory in biology at the time was that inherited traits blend from generation to generation.…
- 2371 Words
- 10 Pages
Better Essays -
Looking at all of the fruit flies, there is no possible way for the parent flies to be homozygous. If the parent flies were homozygous, both the F1 and the F2 phenotypes would be the same holding a 1:1ratio, instead of the 9:3:3:1 ratio that was observed. The purpose of this experiment was to determine the F1 genotype of fruit fly traits using the phenotypic ratio of the F2 generation and to express these results of the unknown cross through a Chi-square model. After taking data with the Chi-squared value of 5.64, the degrees of freedom were 3 and the p-value was between .05 and .2, it is confident to fail to reject the null hypothesis, which leads the experimenters to believe that the observed phenotypic ratio does significantly deviate from that expected under the assumption of Mendelian inheritance. In the future, exploring more complex animals other than fruit flies, such as mammals or reptiles, would make this experiment a little more difficult, but more interesting as well. Without Mendelian genetics, it would be much more difficult to predict traits in organisms across the living…
- 1348 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
In a cross pollination experiment between yellow and green pea plants exclusively, the first generation offspring was always yellow. However, the second generation consistently produced offspring in a ration of 3:1. This ration continued though out further generations. This means the first generation was homozygous but the second became heterozygous. These laws and experiments underline monohybrid inheritance because they form the basis of the punnett square, a visual representation of Mendelian Inheritance, which represents the probabilities of certain alleles being…
- 582 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The traits I chose to do my Punnett squares on are my blue eyes and my freckles. I got my blue eyes from my dad, and my many freckles from my mom. Both my parents have homozygous alleles for blue eyes. My dad has AA and my mom has aa. While my dad has homozygous for freckles and my mom had heterozygous. My dad has no freckles so he has aa, while my mom has tons of freckles so she has Aa. The capitol A’s represent the dominant traits and the lower case a’s represent the recessive traits. Since my dad has homozygous dominant, he passed on his dominant allele to me and my brother. While my mom can either pass on a dominant or recessive allele to me and my brother. Since each combination had a dominant allele, it gives a 100% guarantee that the children will have blue eyes, which explains why I and my brother both have bright blue eyes. As for freckles with my dad having homozygous recessive he can only pass on a recessive allele. While my mom can either pass on a dominant or recessive allele. Which gives a 50% probability that the children can have either a lot of freckles or no freckles at all. Which is why I have tons of freckles, while my brother has none at all. When I was born my chromosomes inherited the blue eyes from my dad, and the freckles from my mom. While when my brother was born, his chromosomes inherited the blue eyes and no freckles both from my dad. Since mine and my brothers genotypes code for different phenotypes, he looks exactly like my dad, while I look like my mom and dad. I got more phenotypes from both of my parents, while my brother got the majority of his phenotypes from my dad. My brother always get told he look exactly like my dad, and now I know why. He look more like my dad to other people because he inherited more phenotypes from my dad, then my mom. I get told I look my mom more, because I inherited more phenotypes from her than my dad. The only phenotype I have from my dad is the bright blue eyes. Which I love and would never…
- 422 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Its founder Gregory Mendel based it on three laws. The Law of Independent Assortment states that genes for different traits can independently separate during the development of gametes. The Law of Segregation which is each gene separates during gamete formation so that each gamete transfers only one allele of each gene. The last one is Law of Dominance which states that some alleles are dominant others are recessive and that an organism with at least one dominant will show the phenotype or the result of that dominant allele. The main test crosses used are a monohybrid cross and dihybrid cross. Monohybrid meaning “one” is the simplest mating between true-breeding individuals from two parental organisms, each displaying one of the two distinct traits of the solo trait under consideration. A dihybrid cross is when two pairs of contrasting traits are studied at the same. Both crosses produce distinctive phenotypic ratios in the second generation (F2) of an offspring. The second generation, a monohybrid cross usually shows a 3:1 phenotypic ratio and a dihybrid cross preferably shows a 9:3:3:1 phenotypic ratio. This specific fruit fly breeding study is essential because its results may provide evidence for simple patterns of Mendelian inheritance (Klug, Cummings, Spencer, Palladino 36,…
- 587 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays