Preview

Memorandum of Oral Pleading

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1630 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Memorandum of Oral Pleading
Memorandum of Oral Pleading

Parties: Mr de Jong (Claimant) and Mini-Coza (Defendant)

Date and time: Thursday 4th October 2012, 10:00hrs

Judge: Mr. de Vries

The Group: Pasi Lindqvist, Daan Bredenbeek, Nick Bruurmijn and Redmer van Berkum

Overview of the Facts and the Compensation Sought

On the 1st of January 2011 the claimant Mr. de Jong purchased a buggie through a German provider Mini-Coza, who operated in the Netherlands for €275. The buggie was to be used by the claimant’s over-one-year-old son Daan.

According to the product description the buggie was suitable for kids aged one year onwards. The claimant used the buggie in a proper and normal manner on a paved path without any serious obstacles. Regardless of the proper use the claimant’s son (Daan) fell through the floor of the trolley, hurting his head and back, suffering from a concussion and a severe injury, a broken arm. The monetary burden of the medical costs caused by these injuries amounts to €2500. Additional costs have occurred on a rate of €1500 per month, amounting to €4500 during three months. These costs are caused by the fact that the claimant’s wife has been traumatized, thus unable to work or take of her son, resulting to the need to hire a nanny.

The council for the claimant will claim special performance in a form of a new buggie and that the abovementioned costs are compensated by awarding monetary damages.

Introductory Outline of the Pleadings

1. Unfair Commercial Practices - EU Law

According to Directive 2005/29/EC unfair commercial practices are prohibited and raise liability for compensation. The council claims that the act falls within the scope of this prohibition.

2. Contract Law, Special Performance – Dutch Private Law (BW)

Furthermore, by establishing defective performance on the part of the trader, the council claims special performance pursuant to a violation of Dutch Contract Law.

3. Tort Law, Wrongful Act – Dutch Private Law (BV)

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Citation- Legal Brief

    • 1352 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The appellant signed a form releasing Kevin’s night club from any liability that might occur when riding the mechanical bull. Kevin’s placed mattresses around the mechanical bull to help cushion the fall when riders where thrown from the bull. However, it was found at the time of the appellant’s injuries the mattresses where not pushed adequately together. The appellant was thrown off the mechanical bull hitting his head on the floor where there was a gap in the mattresses causing serious head and other injuries.…

    • 1352 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The appellant submitted that the respondent was negligent in its placement of the bollard. He claimed that the positioning and colour of the bollard, combined with the lack of light, presented a risk for cyclists at night. From this submission came the main issue of the case: did the respondent’s placement of the bollard breach its duty of care?…

    • 2294 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Legal Brief

    • 671 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Mr. Potbelly holds a garage sale at his home. Mr. Slim Jim stops by the sale and upon noticing a rare piece of art pottery offers a price of $100 for the art that is marked $250. Mr. Potbelly accepts Mr. Slim Jim’s offer. Mr. Potbelly informs Mr. Slim Jim he is selling his home because he is moving up north because he has lost his job. Mr. Slim Jim asks how much he is selling it for and Mr. Potbelly informs him he is thinking $75,000. Mr. Slim Jim offers him $70,000 cash for the property which Mr. Potbelly immediately accepts the offer. Mr. Slim Jim informs Mr. Potbelly that he will be back in one hour with a cashiers’ check made payable to Mr. Potbelly. Mr. Potbelly says “Great!” and that while Mr. Slim Jim is getting the money that he will find a box in his basement for the pottery.…

    • 671 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    LAW 421 Week 3 BugUSA

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Resources: University of Phoenix Material: Case Scenarios: Bugusa, Inc., multimedia link located on the student website and Case ...…

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Brief

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages

    FACTS Rumarson Technologies, Inc. (RTI) sued Robert and Percy Helmer to collect from them personally $24,965 owed to it by Event Marketing, Inc. (EMI) when EMI's check to pay RTI bounced. Robert and Percy Helmer were authorized signatories on EMI's corporate account, and they signed the check. RTI argued that as signatories they could be held personally liable. The lower court agreed and ruled in favor of RTI holding the Helmers liable. The Helmers appealed. Also of note, is that check was dated 1998 although there is some non-material dispute as to whether it was August 14, 1998, or on or around July 13, 1998.…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A “suit” is defined to include a “civil proceeding in which damages because of ‘bodily injury’ . . . to which this insurance applies is alleged.” At present, no suit has been filed against the insured for the losses sustained. Determining whether an insurer has a duty to defend is accomplished by comparing an insured’s policy against allegations made against the insured in a complaint. Under the Section II – Liability part of the policy, a suit is a condition precedent to the insurer’s obligation to either defend or indemnify the insured for liability…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Internal Memo of Law

    • 1254 Words
    • 6 Pages

    under Texas Law, considering Patrick Bergan actions to threat with the intent to inflict malicious harm, harass, or alarm and inflict undue duress on his wife, Lisa Bergan, when he emptied all their joint accounts of $250,000 and cancelled all the credit cards with an available balance of…

    • 1254 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Law Brief

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Facts: The New York Highlanders are building a new stadium, offered a first come first serve season ticket special. In order to be eligible, buyers would have to pay a $10,000 licensing fee which would guarantee a specific seat as identified in a stadium seating diagram. About 10,000 fans signed up and sent in their seating choices at the 50 yard line (the most desired seats) and received confirmation from the Highlanders that their seats were reserved. Unfortunately, after the licenses were sold to the 10,000 fans, the stadiums dimensions were reduced and only had 5,000 available seats on the 50 yard line. The Highlanders announced that 5,000 of the 10,000 would get the preferred seating based on a lottery, and the remaining 5,000 would be given other seats.…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pleadings/Complaint

    • 272 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Comes the Plaintiff Dale M. Roehnig, a minor, resident of Davidson County, Nashville, Tennessee, sues the Defendant Herman A. Schulman, a resident of Davidson County, Nashville, Tennessee, in a cause of action for damages in the sum of Twenty Five Thousand Dollars ($25,000) and for cause of action would show:…

    • 272 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Crowell Academy, Inc. and Arturo Gomez, (hereinafter, collectively "Crowell") were grossly negligent and used willful misconduct in their responsibilities involving the fencing club. The bargaining power of Crowell was so grossly unequal so as to put Lajuana Barnett at the mercy of Crowell's negligence. Lastly, the exculpatory clause contained in the release form (see release form) is void as against public policy. Consequently, under Maryland law, it is up to the trier of fact to determine if the exculpatory clause is unenforceable. As such, there is a dispute as to the genuine issue of material fact related to Crowell's Answer, Crowell can be liable to Lajauna Barnett for negligence, and Crowell is not entitled to Summary Judgment as a matter of law.…

    • 2003 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lawsuit Memo

    • 1058 Words
    • 5 Pages

    How will the reparations of the patent be treated on the financial statements as a result of losing the lawsuit?…

    • 1058 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The owner of the café did not allow a non-customer to use the phone, does this mean the owner of the Lucky Spoon Café is negligent in the death of Louis Jones?…

    • 3010 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Memorandum: Court Cases

    • 278 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Fact: Samantha Smith slipped and fell on spilled shampoo in the aisle at the grocery store in question. After we filed our complaint with the courts; the store alleges that Ms. Smith had a duty to avoid the spillage, but was too distracted by her son to notice. The store feels that Ms. Smith is just as much responsible as they are.…

    • 278 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Court Memorandum of Law

    • 2016 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Was Cruz Estrada’s Fourth Amendment right against unreasonable search and seizure violated when Officer Green grabbed Cruz Estrada’s purse from her shoulder and searched it without her consent, and can the evidence found in Cruz Estrada’s purse be suppressed due to the search being impermissible?…

    • 2016 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Legal Memorandum

    • 1085 Words
    • 4 Pages

    After three years on the job, Attired mentioned her interest in getting a tattoo to a fellow waitress. The waitress warned Attired that if she was going to get a tattoo to make sure that it was somewhere where it would not be visible. This particular waitress had been working at Biddy’s for ten years and knew that if Attired got a tattoo the owner, Biddy Baker, would be upset. In June of 2010, Attired, ignoring the warning given to her by her co-worker, got a full sleeve tattoo that went from her shoulder to her elbow. After showing up to work, Biddy was visibly upset. Some patrons requested to be moved from Attired’s seating section because they commented that they did not want to look at “that” while they were eating. At this point the Plaintiff was told to have tattoo removed, which she refused, and was terminated at the end of the week.…

    • 1085 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays