Preview

Media and law review chapter 4 and 5

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
428 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Media and law review chapter 4 and 5
COMM 222
Test #2
Review sheet
The exam is on chapters 4 and 5, libel and privacy.
As before, there will be a section on matching, short answers, fill in the blank, multiple choice and essays.
If you understand the following terms and what they refer to you will be well prepared for the exam:
Privacy Libel
Appropriation Defamation
Commercial use Identification
False light Publication
Intrusion Fault
Knowing consent Falsity
Misappropriation Injury
Model release Private individual
Name or likeness Public Official
Newsworthiness defense Public figure
Outrage All-purpose public figure
Photo consent form Limited public figure
Private facts Actual malice
Public record privilege Negligence
Right to know Fair comment privilege
Right of publicity Fair report privilege Neutral reportage
Public record privilege Qualified priviledge
Truth as a defense
Libel
Slander
Know the defense(s) for the privacy torts
Libel Cases:
New York Times vs. Sullivan (1964)
• Know the facts of the case
• Know the reasons why the US Supreme Court voted 9-0 in favor of the Times
• Be able to discuss what things would be like today if the court had instead ruled in favor of Sullivan.

AP vs. Curtis (1967)
What are the facts of the case and the outcome, what did it mean?

Rosenbloom v. Metromedia (1971)
• What are the facts of the case and the outcome? What did it mean?
• What did the U.S. Supreme Court rule and why

Gertz vs. Robert Welch Inc. (1974)
• Know the facts of the case? What was the outcome and what did it mean?
• Understand what the ruling means

Richard Jewel
• What are the facts of this case, which we discussed in class.
• Why is Richard Jewel considered a limited public figure?
• Do you think he will win his case against the Atlanta Journal-Constitution?
Privacy cases:
Cantrell vs. Forest City Publishing (1967)
• Know the facts of the case
• Know how the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    HISTORY: At bench trial the District Court ruled for defendant, finding as a matter of law that…

    • 332 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The article is a reliable and solid evidence. First, Sullivan is an influential lawyer, and she was the Dean of Stanford Law School. She was considered to be appointed to the Supreme Court. Thus, she has great knowledge in the law industry to write an article in the Harvard Law Review. Also, the information is from Ruth Ginsburg, O’Connor’s colleague.…

    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Exam #1 will be worth 100 points and consist of short answer/definition, listing and descriptions.…

    • 2210 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    are attached at the end of the exam. Answer all questions in this booklet. The booklet…

    • 2530 Words
    • 27 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Briefly – state the facts of this case, using the information found in the case in LexisNexis. (5 points)…

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The First Amendment was adopted on December 15, 1791, as one of the ten amendments that constitute the Bill of Rights. A careful reading of the First Amendment reveals that it protects several basic liberties freedom i.e. religion, speech, press, petition, and assembly. Interpretation of the amendment is far from easy, as court case after court case has tried to define the limits of these freedoms. The prohibition on abridgment of the freedom of speech is not absolute. Certain types of speech may be prohibited outright. Some types of speech may be more easily constrained than others. Furthermore, speech may be more easily regulated depending upon the location at which it takes place. All these rights protect the people of the US they have the right to religion and speech, they right to say whatever they want as long as it’s true without being held accountable for it. Even though speech is protected by the First Amendment not every speech is protected for example obscenity, child pornography, and speech that constitutes so-called “fighting words” or “true threats” are not protected by the amendment. There has always been controversy for defending the free speech rights of groups that spew hate, such as the Ku Klux Klan and the Nazis. But if only popular ideas were protected, we wouldn't need a First Amendment. If we do not come to the defense of the free speech rights of the most unpopular among us, even if their views are antithetical to the very freedom the First Amendment stands for, then no one's liberty will be secure. I can’t say I disagree with anything about these facts, I do agree that one should have freedom of speech everyone should feel free to express themselves by speaking but not everything should be said and that is why not every speech is protected by the amendment.…

    • 940 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Muenster Pump

    • 363 Words
    • 2 Pages

    This is the most important section of the brief, which explains why the court decided the way that they did.…

    • 363 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Study Guide: Read through these concepts. If you are not sure of what the concept is or means search for the answer in your textbook and write it on a separate sheet of paper. If you know these terms you should do well on the test.…

    • 580 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Media in Court Cases

    • 333 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Media in court cases has many effects. One of which is the possibility that the Medias opinion may result in tainting the jury with unproven facts. As humans we make decisions based on how we perceive the world and the information we have on decision we are going to make.…

    • 333 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Supreme Court has been given credit and blame for having a wide range of effects on society. The decisions that they have made on current and past issues have initiated change in American society. These changes have had both positive and negative results. The effects of their decisions have ranged from improving the status of certain ethnic groups to limiting the procedures of law enforcers and clearly defining the rights of lawbreakers. In essence, Supreme Court decisions have had a profound influence on the behaviors of citizens as well as the political structure of this nation.…

    • 1883 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The exam will be a mixture of matching, definitions, short answer, essay, and ‘other’ questions.…

    • 1071 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Google-China Controversy

    • 3145 Words
    • 13 Pages

    References: [3] Government Control of Information Cass R. Sunstein, California Law Review, Vol. 74, No. 3,…

    • 3145 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Know what to expect in the examination. Any of the syllabus content can appear on either…

    • 1396 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Balance Sheet and Profit

    • 6608 Words
    • 27 Pages

    (Disclaimer : Questions asked in the exam may have wrong/inadequate information and/or ambiguous language. In that case the answers provided by institute may differ from this Ideal Answers. If you find any errors, please email the same.)…

    • 6608 Words
    • 27 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Defamation (India)

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages

    * It is not defamation to prefer in good faith an accusation against any person to any of those who have lawful authority over that person with respect to the subject matter of accusation.…

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays