Question 3 – Max Weber’s ideal-typical conceptualization of the modern bureaucracy
In modern society a bureaucratic structure is considered the most effective way of managing both public and private affairs. This has although not always been the case, and one of the first to describe the emergence and development of bureaucracy was the German sociologist Max Weber. Through his theory of rationalization and subsequent utilization of ideal types he was able to describe this phenomenon on both theoretical and analytical levels. He determined several preconditions for a bureaucratic structure and also described how the rule-bound nature and division of labour were important parts of this. His work has always been subject to much debate, and still remains an important contribution to social scientific research. Max Weber introduced the use of ”ideal types” in analyzing different socio-economic phenomena. An ideal type is created through an “analytical accentuation of certain elements in reality”. In practice this analytical accentuation draws attention to the most important aspects of a given phenomenon, and leaves out the differentiated factors which vary within different cultural contexts. This “breaking down” of factors can be very difficult, and as Weber states “Sharp differentiation in concrete fact is often impossible, but this makes clarity in the analytical distinction all the more important”. Because of the accentuation and differentiation of facts, Ideal types can be classified as analytical and conceptual constructs, which cannot be found in reality. Nonetheless, the utilization of these ideal types plays a very important role when trying to understand different phenomena in society, both on an empirical and analytical level. First of all, an ideal type creates a stylized example, making it easier to understand and focus attention to selected aspects of a given phenomenon. Secondly the ideal type provides a basis of comparison with the empirically observed reality. It can enhance the understanding of how and why a given phenomenon deviates from the ideal type. This deviation can often be explained by value-related behavior and judgment, which can be difficult to identify without having an ideal type to compare it to. The conceptual tool of ideal types is meant to be entirely free of value-judgments, but even in defining an ideal type, the scientist cannot avoid the fact that his own values influence this definition. Weber recognized this dilemma and stated that the social scientist must “…keep a cool head in the face of the ideals [values] prevailing at the time”.According to Weber there are four ideal-typical types of human social action: traditional, affectual, value-rational and purposive rational. There are also three forms of authority: traditional, charismatic and rational-legal. These cannot be found in their pure form in reality, but they help in obtaining what Weber defines as “Verstehen” (understanding) of social phenomena, which is Weber’s primary goal. The concept of ideal types remains a very important contribution to modern social science. Whereas economic theory focuses mainly on ideal types, the utilization of these in social science has made it possible to take social scientific research one step further. Now, the social scientist can both describe and try to rationally understand the behavior of human beings in different settings. One of Max Weber’s most famous contributions to social scientific research is his thesis of rationalization. He claims that capitalism is a result of an increased rationalization and modernization in many areas of society such as economy, law and administration. This rationalization can be described as a transition from value-oriented organization and action to goal-oriented organization and action. In other words, it represents a shift from traditional and charismatic authority to legal-rational authority. In Weber’s ideal-typical conceptualizations he describes a...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document