There are four major themes in his study of society
1. Religion and Class as the key dynamic factors that influence society.
He agreed with Marx that 'class' as 'political economic power' was a major factor in the historical development of 'modern society' However he disagreed that 'class' was the only institution that dominated the development of modern society. Weber believed that cultural factors, especially religion, were also important. However, Weber didn't argue that religion was the cause of Capitalism but that Protestantantism and Capitalism fitted together and developed in interaction with each other. So he did NOT argue that religion 'created' capitalism.
2.Class and Inequality:Class, Status and Power
2.1 Whilst he also agreed with Marx that ownership of capital or labour separated the two major classes of society, he also argued that social inequality in modern society was more complicated than this.
2.2 He argues that differences in the amount of social power, or STATUS differences (that is the amount of admiration or respect we have) are also important aspects of inequality in modern societies..
2.3 He argues with Marx too about political power. Weber believed that modern society was dominated, not only by owners of capital, but also by those with political power. He includes here elected politicians but also (and especially) people who have bureaucratic power. He sees bureaucracy as the major of basis of power in modern society.
3.Bureaucracy. and Rationality
He argued that modern society is distinguished from pre modernism by the way we think, feel and operate in the world. For Weber the key contrast is that we privilege rational thiinking above traditional thinking. Bureacracies are the most important social institutions creating and perpetuating modern society because they are predominantly based on rationality. 'what works most efficiently' not 'how did our fathers do it' is the major guide for modern organisations. - in education, health, politics, and business.
4. The importance of 'meaning' and 'action'
Sociologists should study not just the objective aspects of society ie. 'what we do'. but should address the meaning of behaviour...'why we act. He puts 'behaviour' and 'meaning' together in his concept of 'Action Research'
In conclusion. Weber argues that 'Rationalism' rather than 'Capitalism' is the key to interpreting modernity. However he sees both advantages and disadvantages in Rational Modern societies.
Modernity creates greater efficiency, wealth and justice, but modern people, he said, are also at risk of becoming: dehumanised., becoming ......
'Specialists without spirit, sensualists without heart'
Source(s):
There are lots of general social theory texts around and books specifically about Max Weber. I generally use British or Australian texts but a good, easy-to-understand US one is by Cuzzort and King called 'Twentieth Century Social Thought'.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
* Marx: “Social class is fundamentally determined by one’s relationship to the means of production.”…
- 704 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Comparing and contrasting Marx and Weber we see that their theoretical approaches seem to be completely different at first. However, we notice subtle similarities in their theoretical approaches that makes the consequences of their arguments. Marx and Weber apply their concept of specialization…
- 235 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
Marx Weber was born on April 21, in 1864 in Germany, in a small city named Erfurt and died on June 1920. Actually Weber was not only an economist and a political scientist but also he was one of the three great founders of sociology, with Marx and Durkheim. Those three are known as the fathers of modern sociology. His family played a vital role in his whole life and had great influence on him as his father was a distinguished and well known lawyer and politician and his mother was a religious person who gave him support throughout his work and life. The time when Weber lived was one of the most important in the history of Germany. In 1871 all German states joined up in order to form Germany as a country, or the First Reich as it was known, with Prussia being the leader. It is also worthwhile to be said that after 1870 Germany saw a rapid industrialization taking place. This made it the greatest industrial power in Europe by 1900. All these socio-economical changes affected Weber’s writings.…
- 1679 Words
- 7 Pages
Better Essays -
4)Weber, Max, 1864-1920.: The Protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism /Max Weber ; translated by Talcott Parsons. 2nd ed. / introduction by Anthony Giddens.. London : Allen and Unwin, 1976. 292 p.…
- 1754 Words
- 5 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Both sociologists have agreed that economical factors were crucial in the shaping of social class and the inequalities of society. The key difference within these two theories is that Marx believes that two groups within society are important in understanding the workings of society, his groups are divided by the ownership of the means of production (property assets). Where Weber believes there are many more important groups and strata within those groups that need to be understood. Weber realised that there was other groups that needed to be recognised, as there is important conflict within Marx’s two classes, which needs to be understood to comprehend how the society operates.…
- 1837 Words
- 8 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Karl Marx and Max Weber offer two very different but valid approaches to social class in modern capitalist society. In a capitalist society the private ownership of the means of production is the dominant form of providing the things needed to survive. What distinguishes capitalism from other types of society is the emphasis on the rights of property and the individual owner’s right to employ capital, as she or he thinks fit.…
- 591 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
According to Karl Marx social class depends on a factor of a person’s relationship to the means of production. He distinguished two classes: owner of the means of production (bourgeoisie) and a worker who works on these factories, tools and land, proletariat. Marx believed that person’s life is shaped only with regard of what he owns and what he works on. Max Weber believed that social class is made up of three elements: property, power and prestige. According to Weber, property is the main source of power however, other components are interrelated too.…
- 408 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Another point that appealed and I found to be relevant in today’s society was Marx’s ideas on class distinction. With the acceptance that “10% of the people have 100% of the property”, this ratio of figures has definite parallels in today’s means of class distinction and in particular wealth; with 20% of the United States population having almost 90% of the wealth. The stratification Marx underlines is comparable to the outlined differences seen in society this modern day.…
- 489 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
With that, the Materialist Conception of History is established; the struggle between the two classes and the modes of production can be documented as the driving motor of history, regardless of the economic system. I believe Marx's theory is extremely accurate and applicable to our present society, and with support of Marx's works, this leads me to believe Marx accounts are more convincing than Webers.…
- 2538 Words
- 11 Pages
Good Essays -
The article presents Weber’s argument regarding social stratification in contrast to Marx’s. In his discussion of his theory of social stratification, he outlines three ways in which society is divided: by class (economically), status (socially) and by party (ideologically). He argues that the individual identity is not determined by the class identity, and that status and party identities often cross class divisions.…
- 855 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Weber’s writings show that there are other aspects apart from class and how they strongly influence people’s lives and this allowed a more flexible basis than Marx provided in order to analyse stratification.…
- 2277 Words
- 10 Pages
Powerful Essays -
According to Weber, a complete sociological analysis must recognize the interplay between economic, political, and cultural Karl Marx analyzed capitalism as an economic system with enormous implications for how society is organized, in particular how inequality between groups stems from the economic organization of society. Max Weber used a multidimensional approach to analyzing society, interpreting the economic, cultural, and political organization of society as together shaping social institutions and social change.…
- 529 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
According to Weber, the spirit of capitalism, as old as humankind itself, was not carried out the same way in the world. He gave examples of various forms of business and trades all around the world that were characterized by greed, unscrupulousness or a lack of interest for money, and explained such dissimilarities with his studies about religion.…
- 964 Words
- 4 Pages
Better Essays -
In the fast moving times of the modern world, human beings have become very calculating, manipulative and running after the material pursuit in which they are eventually getting trapped into the invisible prison from which escape is almost impossible. This is what Max Weber meant by the metaphor "Iron Cage". Max Weber, a great thinker and a well known German Sociologist coined the term "An Iron Cage" in his works in early 1900’s. According to him the modern era human beings, especially in the western capitalist society are increasingly being caught in the process of Rationalism and the factors related to it such as, Bureaucracy, Disenchantment and Individualism. Through this essay we intent to agree with Weber about how he thought that Modern Capitalism in which people are rational is literally inescapable process in which they are getting locked into, and this ultimately gives rise to bureaucracy. We will give some evidences proving Weber ideas on how the protestant ethics contributed to the rise of capitalism and also show how there are no solid alternatives to this problem of bureaucracy.…
- 1422 Words
- 4 Pages
Better Essays -
Max Weber disagreed with Marx’s claim that economics is the central force in social change.Weber believed that religion was the central force of social change. His conclusion came from him contrasting the Roman Catholic and Protestant belief systems. “Roman Catholics, he said, were taught that because they were members of the only true church, they were on the road to heaven. This made them comfortable with traditional ways of life.” (Henslin, pg. 8). While Roman Catholics followed their system, protestants undermined the spiritual security of its followers and motivated them to embrace change. Protestants that were under the Calvinist tradition didn’t even know if they were saved until…
- 1548 Words
- 7 Pages
Good Essays