Preview

Marxist view on workforce

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
318 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Marxist view on workforce
group in society has a different idea on what the main role of the family is. As Item 2B says, “Marxists see all social institutions as serving the interests of capitalism.” This includes the family, and they say that it serves the interests of capitalism by maintaining and justifying class inequality and exploitation by the rich. Other groups, however, have different opinions, such as Functionalists who think that the family performs essential needs of society. Marxists and Functionalists opinions are completely contrasted, as Marxists think that we live in a Capitalist society based on unequal conflict between the classes, whilst Functionalists see society as based on “value consensus”, where everyone agrees.
The family is an important market for the sale of consumer goods because advertisers encourage families to be in competition with each other (“keeping up with the Joneses”), and to keep buying all the latest gizmos and gadgets. They also target children who use their “pester power” to get their parents to buy more things and spend more money on them.This is one of the ways that Marxists say the family serves capitalism, because the family generates major profits for it. They also say that capitalism exploits the labour of the workers, making a profit by selling the products made from their labour for more than it costs them to be produced.
Another argument from the Marxist perspective is that the family performs key ideological functions for capitalism by justifying and maintaining inequality , which in turn maintains capitalism. As suggested in Item 2B ,they say that the family socialises children into accepting and being used to heirarchy and inequality. The parents power over their children gets the children used to the idea that someone is always in charge, which prepares them for working, where they will contribute to capitalism by obeying orders from their employers. Zaretsky says that the family performs the ideological function of... [continues]

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Another argument from the Marxist perspective is that the family performs key ideological functions for capitalism by justifying and maintaining inequality , which in turn maintains capitalism. As suggested in Item 2B ,they say that the family socialises children into accepting and being used to heirarchy and inequality. The parents power over their children gets the children used to the idea that someone is always in charge, which prepares them for working, where they will contribute to capitalism by obeying orders from their employers. Zaretsky says that the family performs the ideological function of offering…

    • 1008 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Outline and evaluate sociological views on the role of the family in society (33 marks)…

    • 1423 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In addition, Zaretsky(1976) sees the nuclear family as a contributing factor to the capitalist system for a number of reasons. For example, the family consumes the commodities produced by capitalism that helps the bourgeoisie to make profits, but this is negative for the proletariat family as they spend their money to help the ruling class. Another example is that the proletariat produces future generations of workers who will go on to make profits for the bourgeoisie which makes them even wealthier. Lastly, the family socializes its children into norms and values which supports the position of the ruling class through obeying the authority and unquestioningly accept inequality as ineitability of life. This si negative of the subject class as they will continue to serve the ruling class, but it is positive for them as they get a lot of generations of worker. These views are supported by David Cooper(1972), who sees the family as 'an ideological conditioning device' in which children learn to conform to authority to become cooperative and easily exploited workers.…

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marxist and Feminist sociologists have criticised Murdoch’s theory. They say that Functionalism ignores conflict and exploitation within society. Feminists see the family as being patriarchal and serving the needs of men and Marxists see the family as meeting the needs of capitalism and not the needs of the family members.…

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The view that the family upholds capitalism and its values. Marxists See society in terms of the base-superstructure model. As the base the economy shapes everything else, and the family is no exception and it is seen as reflecting the needs of the capitalist economy.…

    • 342 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Murdoch (1949) claimed the family was a universal institution. He studied 250 societies and found the family, in some form, was present in all of them. This suggests that families are necessary in some way, whether it be for societies to survive, for individual well-being or indeed both.…

    • 690 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sociology 24 marks

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages

    iology 24 marks – Using material from item 2b and elsewhere assess the Marxist view that the main role of the family is to serve the interests of capitalism.…

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Outline and evaluate Functionalist views of the role of the family in society. [33 marks]…

    • 1558 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    of history, in away there will be no new history created. The victory of the proletariat and the birth of a classless society, therefore creates a Utopian end of history which is the goal of all previous historical events.…

    • 449 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Marxists believe that the nuclear family is dominant in Society. They see the family in the classic way and they all perform essential functions and do a lot of things for each other and stick to the classic roles of the man is the breadwinner where he goes out and makes all the money to supply for the family, the mother does the house work but still earns money to supply for the family and looks after the children etc, the traditional family sort of lifestyle. Marxists believe that the family all just go out to earn money and this money is supplied in to the family to keep them going with things like food and drink, utilities and other things like that, a quote from Zaretesky was that when the man returns home after work he is the ‘king of the castle’ basically saying that the main is in charge and makes the most money, again backing up the view that Marxists believe the family should be traditional and the man is the breadwinner with his partner caring and cooking for him etc but more gives the man satisfaction as some views believe that the mother runs the household as she does all of the work and runs the house because she does all of the work like cook the family tea and tidy up, general house chores to keep it intact. Another point the Marxists believe in is that the children accept capitalism and levels of hierarchy in society so there are lots of different roles and things like management so the parents are in charge and have the authority in the house hold and they teach them this is how life works and this is how the work place works, there is always going to be someone in authority and there is always going to be someone higher up than you and they have to accept this and follow the rules. This again links back to and backs up the original point that Marxists believe in a traditional family. According to Marxists families also believe in status inheritance. This theory was backed up in 1884 by Engel…

    • 653 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marxists believe that in the family the dominant interest is of capitalism. Children plead with their parent’s for new and stylish items, the parent’s give in and allow the child to have the item, and this is a typical example of capitalism.…

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When examining the painting of the wealthy European family the degree of wealth is clearly visible in both the environment and the people. The wealthy family seems to be surrounded by various items of wealth, such as paintings, ritzy furniture, fancy curtains, and the prestigious clothing they wear all contribute to the expression of content visible on their faces. In contrast the deprived family is clustered together with their several children because it was necessary for the children to work in order to receive manageable income. This painting in particular expurgates a vicarious feeling of sorrow and misery, which is clearly visible in every family member’s face. Marxist theorists would argue that the wealthy family can afford luxurious items and live peacefully every day, while the poor family struggles because there was an incredibly uneven distribution of wealth. Based on the labor theory, the worker is cheated of the value his labor creates, which the low wages of workers meant the threat of over – production, accumulated goods, and depression. The poor family cannot earn enough money to comfortably live day to day because the corporate business owners and those of nobility do not pay the workers enough, and siphon all of the accumulated…

    • 665 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    As Sociology

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages

    (e) Using material from Item 2B and elsewhere, assess the Marxist view that the main role of the family is to serve the interests of capitalism. (24 marks)…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    I don’t know; because in the general sense of what the family is, allow us to form or make many fathers and mothers, sisters and brothers, uncles and etc, namely to those that we accepted and recognize to play that role. So the family is very important like both the liberals and the conservative’s points out that it is positive and the foundation of health society. Secondly, I belief that attitude, behaviors or characteristics are things we learn. And therefore if we learn and master (perfected) our roles in society for the good of each other, inequality based on class, gender, and sexual orientation wouldn’t be a problem. Because we will know and understand who we are, and recognized our societal…

    • 885 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In the following essay I am going to compare and contrast the theories of marxism and functionalism, looking at the topics of the family and education.…

    • 2075 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays