Martin Luther King Analysis

Only available on StudyMode
  • Download(s) : 48
  • Published : March 26, 2009
Open Document
Text Preview
Martin Luther King was a gifted wordsmith whose purpose was to choose just the right words to stir people’s feelings, logic, and ethics to support and add power to his cause. His words were explicitly used to communicate with his fellow clergymen and extensive allusions to the Holy Bible were made in attempt to reach out on parallel terms with his audience—who were, contrary to their beliefs, impeding the Negro progress. Martin Luther King presents facts that cannot be argued; they are accepted by all to be true. He uses this technique effectively while explaining the difference between a just and unjust law. He uses simple logos at times and complex literary allusions at others. The whole letter flows along the lines of just and unjust laws. His use of logos in the letter is most obvious when he points out the four steps for a nonviolent campaign: “collection of the facts to determine whether injustices exist; negotiation; self-purification; and direct action.” Martin Luther King openly beliefs that “one has not only a legal but a moral responsibility to obey just laws. Conversely, one has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws.” Throughout his letter, Martin Luther King mainly used logos when mentioning just and unjust laws. Logos is easier to follow and comprehend, since it directly addresses the “logical circuit” part of the brain—rather than having to break apart convoluted examples and explanations. King argues that an “unjust law is no law at all.” This simple statement sums up both King’s incentive to protest and his motive to oppose laws. King, as this and many other texts manifest, does a very good job of directly addressing his audience—whether it be fellow clergymen or livid African Americans. The letter also tells a lot about King himself. King is a man of great faith and robust morals. He is a man who deems segregation politically, economically, sociologically wrong. He repeatedly addresses the “white moderate” as the man devoted to order...
tracking img