Preview

Firms Balk at Gay Weddings

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
899 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Firms Balk at Gay Weddings
Firms Balk at Gay Weddings
Photographers, Bakers Face Legal Challenges After Rejecting Jobs on Religious Grounds
BY NATHAN KOPPEL

AND AsHBY JONES

As more states permit gay couples to marry or form civil unions, wedding professionals in at least six states have run headlong into state antidiscrimination laws after refusing for religious reasons to bake cakes, arrange flowers or perform other services for same-sex couples.
The issue gained attention in
August, when the New Mexico
Supreme Court ruled that anAlbuquerque photography business violated state antidiscrimination laws after its owners declined to snap photos of a lesbian couple's commitment ceremony.
Similar cases are pending in
Colorado, Illinois, New York, Oregon and Washington, and some experts think the underlying legal question-whether free-speech and religious rights should allow exceptions to state antidiscrimination laws-could ultimately wind its way to the U.S. Supreme
Court.
Religious-rights advocates argue that the Constitution affords people the right to abstain from a ceremony that violates their religious beliefs. "It's an evisceration

Laws in Conflict
Same-sex marriages have highlighted tensions between antidiscrimination and freespeech measures:

+ Laws in many states ban businesses from discriminating against people based on their sexual orientation.

versus

+ The free-speech

clause in the
First Amendment may protect people from being compelled to speak in favor of issues with which they disagree.

+ The First Amendment also protects the right to 'freely exercise' one's religion.
+ Laws in some states restrict the government from hindering the free exercise of religion.

of our freedom of association,"
· said John Eastman, the chairman of the National Organization for
Marriage, a group opposed to legalizing same-sex marriage.
Supporters of gay marriage argue that the businesses objecting to working on same-sex ceremonies

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Snyder, Claire R. Gay Marriage and Democracy. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers Inc., 2006. 1-116. Print.…

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stutzman Case Summary

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Washington state’s highest court unanimously ruled on February 16 against a florist who refused to provide floral arrangements for a same-sex couple’s wedding, deciding that her refusal was a discriminatory act.…

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Arlene’s Flowers) who cited her right under the First Amendment to religious freedom. Arlene’s Flowers was one of the first businesses to be heavily fined for violating Washington’s new anti-discrimination law that prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, gender, disability, or sexual orientation. Arlene, the owner of Arlene’s flowers, cites her personal religious freedom in her claim validating her discriminatory actions against two men who sought her floral services for their wedding. The plaintiff argues that while she is free to practice her religion, her views on their marriage is not grounds for denial of service. Furthermore, although Arlene has personal prejudice against same-sex marriage, these convictions do not require her to violate her religious freedom, insisting that their marriage does not infringe on her personal…

    • 866 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    However, the First Amendment doesn’t give businesses a license to sell goods and services to the general public but then reject customers based on race or religion or sexual orientation in violation of state law. The equal treatment of gay couples is more important than the free speech rights of commercial photographers. If Elaine Huguenin was a private photographer that took pictures on her own time then sold them in galleries, it would be a different story.…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Francis Mejia Period 4 Many parts of the United States Constitution can be interpreted in different ways. This makes it difficult to make decisions on cases because of the many possible ways to look at what is constitutional and what is not. In every court decision, The Supreme Court must carefully analyze and interpret the amendments to the Constitution and apply them. The first Amendment states that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.” One controversial case involving the rules of the First Amendment was Snyder v. Phelps in 2010.…

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Strict constructionism is where the people want everything to be straight from the constitution, thus wanting everything word for word from the constitution. However, loose constructionism is where they have a very loose interpretation of the constitution. With loose constructionism elastic language is acceptable.…

    • 350 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marriage is traditionally viewed as the legal union of a man and woman as husband and wife. However, what happens when those two people are two men or two women? This topic of gay marriage has been a major issue in the United States over the past few years. It has raised several political debates as well as other minor arguments throughout the United States and around the world. Until recently, homosexual couples in the United States were allowed to marry. Recently, a series of events change the standing of homosexual marriages in the United States. The Supreme Court's ruling in Lawrence v. Texas repealed a Texas law that made sodomy a crime in order to affirm the privacy rights of homosexuals. In November 2003, the Massachusetts Supreme Court ruled that the state cannot deny marriage licenses to homosexual couples. Following the Massachusetts decision, more gay marriages occurred publicly across the nation from San Francisco to New York. President George W. Bush responded to these activities by urging Congress to pass a constitutional amendment to ban same-sex marriages. On May 17, 2004, Massachusetts became the first state to grant legalized same-sex marriages.…

    • 606 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Gay Marriage(Mediation)

    • 1586 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Since the 1970's, same-sex marriage has been the forefront of the equal rights movement In America. The nation wide acceptance of homosexuality has risen from nearly a fraction, to over half of our countrie's population in the past 30 years. The accomplishments that benifit same-sex rights have been astounding in such little time. While still, the opposing party is fighting at equal rates to endeavor the sanctity of marriage. Why has this become "the" debate of our generation?…

    • 1586 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gay Marriage and Conflict

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages

    On the outside looking in, it is rather apparent that there are two objectives in regards to gay marriage; those who say “green-light” and those who say “red-light”. In essence, when you consider the marriage battle between homosexuals and heterosexuals -- it’s like fire and ice; they both have the potential to overcome each other’s privileged power. “It’s this tug of war between whose gut feeling is better or morally correct that perpetuates the cycle of bitter feelings,” suggests David Myers , a spokesperson for gay rights (Myers & Scanzoni, 2005, p. 129). When we take into consideration the lenses model, you quickly notice that you have three parties – one that is for the institution of gay marriage, one that is against it, and one that is liaison between the both (the government). Those who say “green light” for gay marriage see themselves as being “ostracized by the other parties for wanting to belong” (Myers & Scanzoni, 2005, p. 13). Rather than being avoidant, this party finds it more promising to just promote “collaboration as they find an integrative solution that will satisfy both the other parties” (Hocker & Wilmot, 2007, p. 163). Meanwhile, those who say “red light” to gay marriage either see their counterparts (the “green lighters” and the government) as unmoral tradition breaking savages (Myers & Scanzoni, 2005, p. 113). They believe in that the perfect union in marriage as that of a heterosexual bases rather than a homosexual. The government on the other hand sees itself as the crowd pleaser. They are persuaded by the vote of the masses and see their part only as one who acts accordingly to the public interest.…

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gay Marriage Rebuttal

    • 603 Words
    • 3 Pages

    3.5% of Americans identify as lesbian, gay, bisexual, or transgendered (LGBT) (Gates, 2006). Understanding that this is the minority it seems reasonable to conclude that normative definition of marriage may well be between a man and woman. When we look at his premise of historical precedent I know of few stories of same-sex couples in history and it seems that this then is true. In assessing reliability the speaker is the co-founder and chair of a multi-million dollar coalition and has been selected to speak at many political and religious conferences world-wide. Lastly in assessing validity the speaker has made a fallacy in…

    • 603 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hello fellow classmates and Ms Argus today I will be talking about the topic of gay marriage in Australia. First of all let me say it seems that the reason why there are so many arguments with this problem is because there are two different opinions on what marriage is. One opinion is from a non-religious person’s point of view and the other is from a Christian’s point of view. A non-religious person sees marriage as a celebration of love whereas a Christian would see marriage as the uniting of a man and women. Should it be legalised? Well yes I say it should be legalised and frankly I don’t see any reasons at all to why it shouldn’t be legalised. I mean if two people love each other, they should have the right to celebrate their love for each other. Nowadays there is no tolerance for discrimination. We as humans are discriminating against homosexual people for not allowing them to get married. The most romantic moment of a person’s life is the moment of proposal and marriage but aren’t we aren’t we denying homosexuals of experiencing that special moment? I mean heterosexual couples no matter how old they are will always remember their proposal and wedding day. There are also many children around the world that need adoption and who better to adopt then couples who can’t produce a baby?…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1996, President Clinton signed the Defense of Marriage Act, which defines marriage to be a "legal union between one man and one woman." Many other political leaders, Republicans and Democrats alike, have aligned themselves with both Presidents Bush and Clinton.…

    • 1241 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    gay marriage outline

    • 2022 Words
    • 8 Pages

    iv. The church does not marry people. The church has blessed many other things that involve destruction.…

    • 2022 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Today, 8 out of our 50 states has passed some sort of law, or regulation, that allows gay marriage in their own respected state. According to data released from the 2000 census bureau collection, there are now over 594,391 gay couples living in this country. With the increasing rate of LGBT activism, nationwide controversy has began to spread in the last few years. From gay pride marches, to sit ins, and to riots the issue of gay rights, and more specifically gay marriage, has become the civil rights movement of the 21st century. Because I uphold the notion that a “marriage” is under the power of a higher being for your respected religion, I believe it is appropriate to leave the decision of whom that religion decides to marry to that religion itself. What I do not agree with, however, is that gay and lesbian couples do not have the same legal and authoritative power that heterosexual couples do. In terms of civil rights, the issue should not be if the couple in question should be allowed marriage in their respected religion, but resolving the issue of civil unions that do not allow gay couples to have the same documental rights that a man and a women have when they are joined together in this country. By making a civil union and a marriage equal on the same playing field, as far a legal reasons are concerned, you are allowing that couple to uphold their constitutional right to be treated as an equal, benefiting society by allowing these unions to become stabilizing influences for families, and allowing the couple to gain benefits such as parental rights and right to property.…

    • 1120 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The institution of marriage has traditionally been defined as between a man and a woman. In the Oct. 15, 1971 decision Baker v. Nelson (186 KB) , the Supreme Court of Minnesota found that "The institution of marriage as a union of man and woman, uniquely involving the procreation and rearing of children within a family, is as old as the book of Genesis.”…

    • 2330 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays