Preview

Marketing Myopia Summary

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
592 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Marketing Myopia Summary
Marketing Myopia
In his article Marketing Myopia, Theodore Levitt insists that failure in industries is “at the top” where executives deal with broad goals and policies. He defines marketing myopia using something he calls the “self-deceiving cycle.” This cycle consists of four conditions which cause companies to stop growing: the belief that growth is secure, overconfidence on their own products, too much focus on mass production, and preoccupation with manufacturing efficiency.
The first condition in the cycle is the belief that growth is secured by an increasing and more prosperous population. A market expansion keeps companies from thinking imaginatively. Levitt names the petroleum business as a disturbing example to show that if your product has an automatically expanding market, then you will not engage into a creative thinking on how to expand it. As Levitts quotes “the petroleum business is a distressing example of how complacency and wrongheadedness can stubbornly convert opportunity into near disaster.”
A second condition is the belief that there is no competitive substitute for the industry’s major product. To sustain this idea, the author mentions major industries in which growth has been affected or is in danger of being affected because of companies believing their products were “unchallenging superior”. Grocery stores, dry cleaning, and electric utilities are among the industries Levitt mentions, have come under a shadow for being wrongly positioned. However, Levitt’s richest example is why the railroads have stopped growing. It wasn’t because of the need for passengers but “because the need was not filled by the railroads themselves.”
Another condition is too much reliance in mass production and in the benefits of lowering unit costs as output increases. All Industries’ efforts are directed to production and selling while marketing, a more complex process gets ignored. To make his point, the author explains the difference between marketing

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Example of DryCleaning : They were not bitten because their competitors made better, but because they find a way not to use drycleaning!…

    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marketing Myopia

    • 627 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Marketing Myopia is narrow minded approach to a marketing situation where only short-range goals are considered or Where the marketing focuses on only one aspect out of many possible marketing attributes…

    • 627 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In Theodore Levitt 's article, "Marketing Myopia" (1975), the concept of marketing was widened by examining the history of failed industries doomed to fail eventually. Industries failed to continue their growth not because of a saturated market but failure of proper management. They did not realize the need of expanding into areas in which they were already familiar. Levitt used the railroads as an example because railroads were not focusing on other modes of transportation such as cars and planes, and ships. The railroads only wanted to think of rail transport.…

    • 998 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In this article, author Theodore Levitt explores the major factors that have an impact on the growth opportunities for organizations. With the help of examples from different industries such as the movie industry, the automobile industry, the petroleum industry, the grocery stores etc., he highlights some common misconceptions and strategic errors made by firms that have led or may lead to their subsequent failure. The main point that he makes is that most of these organizations were very myopic when it came to their marketing ideals. For example, the railroad industry declined to see itself as being a part of the transportation industry. Instead, it looked at itself being in just the railroad industry, hence not strategizing and adjusting for other transportation mediums that were being discovered. This narrow view or myopia ultimately led to its decline. Another idea that ties into this argument is that many of these companies tended to be product oriented. They either were completely focused on mass production generating as much product as possible, or they were completely focused on conducting research and development without giving much attention to the market environment. Their efforts were only centered on the product. What Levitt points out is that instead of being product oriented, these companies should be customer oriented so that they don’t just make the product, but make a product that the customers want. Thus they should focus their efforts on marketing, which is a process that unveils the needs and wants of the…

    • 253 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Jones, RonaldW. and PeterB. Kenen (1984), Handbookof International Economics.Amsterdam: North-Holland. Keller, Mary Ann (1993), Collision: GM, Toyota,Volkswagen and the Race to Own the 21st Century. New York:CurrencyDoubleday. Knight,FrankH. (1936), "ThePlace of MarginalEconomics in Socialist Calculation,"American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings,26, 255-66. J. Orientation: Kohli,Ajay K. andBernard Jaworski(1990), "Market The Construct,ResearchPropositions,and ManagerialImplications,"Journalof Marketing,54 (April), 1-18. Kuhn, William E. (1970), The Evolution of Economic Thought. Cincinnati:South-Western PublishingCo. Is Lavin, Douglas (1994), "Chrysler Now Lowest-CostProducerin Auto Industry, Harbour ReportSays," WallStreetJournal (June 23), B3. Lavoie, Don (1985), Rivalry and Central Planning. Cambridge: CambridgeUniversityPress. Robert(1959), A Historyof EconomicIdeas. New York: Lekachman, Harper. Bell Lippman,S.A. and R.P.Rumelt(1982), "Uncertain Imitability," Journalof Economics, 13, 418-38. Marwell,Geraldand RuthE. Ames (1981), "EconomistsFree Ride: Does Anyone Else?"Journalof Public Economics, 15, 295-310. McGee, J.S. (1975), "Efficiencyand Economies of Size," in Industrial Concentration:The New Learning,H. Goldschmid,H.M. Mann,and J.F Weston,eds. Boston:Little, Brown,55-105. and William M. Pride McKee, Daryl O., P. Rajan Varadarajan, A (1989), "StrategicAdaptabilityand Firm Performance: Market-ContingentPerspective,"Journal of Marketing,53 (July), 21-35. HarvardBusinessReMintzberg, Henry(1987), "Crafting Strategy," view (July-August),66-75. C.A. and Michael E. Porter(1991), Strategy:Seeking Montgomery, and SecuringCompetitive Business Advantage.Boston: Harvard School Publishing. Morgan,RobertM. and Shelby D. Hunt(1994), "TheCommitmentTrustTheory of RelationshipMarketing," Journalof Marketing, 58 (July), 20-38. Narver,JohnC. and StanleyF. Slater(1990), "TheEffect of Market Orientation Business Profitability," on Journal of Marketing,54 (October),20-35. Atul, Jagdish N. Sheth, and F. Brown Whittington,Jr. Parvatiyar, (1992), "ParadigmShift in InterfirmMarketingRelationships: EmergingResearchIssues,"workingpaper,EmoryUniversity. A. of Peteraf,Margaret (1993), "TheCornerstones Competitive Advantage:A Resource-BasedView,"StrategicManagementJournal, 14 (3), 179-91. Porter,Michael E. (1980), Competitive Advantage.New York:The Free Press. (1985), Competitive Strategy.New York:The Free Press. (1990), The CompetitiveAdvantage of Nations. New York:The Free Press. a Strate(1991), "Towards DynamicTheoryof Strategy," gic Management Journal, 12, 95-117. C.K. and Gary Hamel (1990), "TheCore Competenceof Prahalad, the Corporation," HarvardBusiness Review(May-June),79-91. Reed, Richardand RobertJ. DeFillippi (1990), "CausalAmbiguity, Barriersto Imitation,and SustainableCompetitiveAdvantage," 88-117. Academyof Management Review, 15 (January), JaimeA., RobertL. PhillipsandPeterA. Westfall(1994), Roquebert, "Markets Versus Management: What 'Drives ' Profitability," workingpaper,TexasTech University.…

    • 11943 Words
    • 48 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    It is surprising how Theodore Levitt was able not only to pinpoint core principle of corporation development which utterly changed the minds of managers of majority big companies of that time. “Marketing Myopia” introduced the new business reality. It is a visionary work that is still popular in nowadays. Although article was written more than 50 years ago we still see the same problems today. Let`s take for example the petroleum industry. Levitt suggests that the oil companies had a single focus perspective on expansion and growth through multiplying consumers that purchased more products. In present time the oil companies continue to take a product-based approach, defining themselves as being in the business of selling gasoline. They purposely don’t want to change their product orientation and moving their companies to a dead end. Oil companies ignore growth opportunities and rely on longevity of the products however it is clear that the future is after alternative sources of energy. On the other hand automobiles companies one after another present their new concept cars working on energy, biological, environment-friendly fuel.…

    • 432 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Marketing Myopia Summary

    • 268 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Companies stop growing because of a failure in management, not because the market is saturated (Levitt, 2008:1). Myopia is a term used and means to be shortsighted. In business, this would mean not having the foresight or long term plan to fully understand what business you are in as well as how to stay in it.…

    • 268 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marketing Myopia

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Marketing Myopia is defined by how almost every major industry used to once be a growth industry. However, presently they have already reached a declining period where growth is unable to return though not the fault of the market. As the market is not saturated making growth difficult, reaching the declining period was due to companies being unable to manage themselves properly.…

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Christensen, C. M. (1997). The innovator’s dilemma: When new technologies cause great firms to fail. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.…

    • 2147 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Harvard Business review

    • 524 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Referring to summary of this article, (as released, in the HBR) Marketing Myopia responded that question in a very new demanding way simply by urging businesses to define their industries broadly to benefit from growth chances. Using the archetype of the railroads, Levitt showed the way they declined undoubtedly as technology advanced simply because they defined themselves too directly. To keep on growing, companies should ascertain and act on their customers’ needs and desires, and definitely not bank about the presumptive longevity with their products.…

    • 524 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1960, Theodore Levitt, a marketing professor at the Harvard Business School, published a celebrated article entitled "Marketing Myopia." It is difficult to find a manager or planner who does not know the theme, even if he or she has never read the article.The basic point was that firms should define themselves in terms of broad industry orientation—"underlying generic need" in the words of Kotler and Singh (1981:39)—rather than narrow product or technology terms. To take Levitt's favorite examples, railroad companies were to see themselves in the transportation business, oil refiners in the energy business. Companies had a field day with the idea, rushing to redefine themselves in all kinds of fancy ways—for example, the articulated mission of one ball bearing company became "reducing friction." It was even better for the business schools. What better way to stimulate the students than to get them dreaming about how the chicken factory could be in the business of providing human energy or garbage collection could become beautification?…

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marketing Myopia

    • 956 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Critique of “Marketing Myopia”Written in 1960, the paper “Marketing Myopia” was written by Theodore Levitt, a professor of marketingat Harvard Business School. It has been republished a number of times since then. The publication thatthis critique is based on is from the Best of HBR series, in the July-August edition of the Harvard BusinessReview (pages 138-149).In Levitt’s article, he explores and details issues he saw with big business’ short-sightedness (i.e.“myopia”) and failure to adopt a broader consideration of external factors in their corporate strategies,including the neglect to evaluate the needs and wants of the consumer. This inattention has resulted and isresulting in the collapse of long-established firms. Levitt uses examples from many industries includingthe railroad, petroleum, automobile, movie, and electronics markets, along with other references to grocerychains, dry cleaners, and buggy whip manufacturers to develop his case that firms have placed too muchimportance on their product and selling it, as opposed to adapting a broader, more flexible classification of their purpose and offerings. Levitt presented four main conditions which could lead to this failure:“- 1. The belief that growth is assured by an expanding and more affluent population;-2. The belief that there is no competitive substitute for the industry’s major product;-3. Too much faith in mass production and in the advantages of rapidly declining unit costs asoutput rises;-4. Preoccupation with a product that lends itself to carefully controlled scientific{activities}.” (Levitt, p. 140)Levitt argued that firms’ strategies should evolve with the consumer, paying more attention to actuallylistening to and marketing to consumers instead of blindly selling to them, and exercise the foresight to seewhat new innovative services or products may be lurking on the horizon that could be taken advantage of to benefit both the individual firm and the market as…

    • 956 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hypercomepetition

    • 1113 Words
    • 5 Pages

    says. "But I found that successful companies were not doing any of these things. The best performers were disrupting markets,…

    • 1113 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marketing Myopia

    • 2415 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In line with Levitt (1960), Marketing Myopia refers to the narrow view of myopia, marketing and business environment. This kind of advertising program without any demand with clients but an organization will is to sell goods or services within particular economic markets. It tilted a business to focus on its desire, rather than what the shopping desires, and often modifying to form a culture of immunity each typically end up losing the name, business damage and ineffective commercial practice Levitt, (1960). This is accomplished exploring by them, an enterprise may appear an extra fully meet customer needs and wants, in order to develop its business. It offers a brilliant view of thoughts for your customers. At "Marketing Myopia," Levitt (1960), he indicates the current marking statement said: "Marketing is a stepson" most of the organizations stressed production and marketing.…

    • 2415 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Marketing Myopia

    • 279 Words
    • 2 Pages

    ·Failure of management instead of market saturation is the key reason for growth industry being threatened, slowed or stopped.…

    • 279 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays