Preview

Marital Status and Job Satisfaction

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2815 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Marital Status and Job Satisfaction
!"#$$%& '()* '+, ' '-)./(#+/$)01/$#+2)/-3)4%*)!/+#56/7+#%-8)9%-:; maritalsatisfaction Marital satisfaction job satisfaction --X2 CFI RMSEA Maritaldiscord Model 1 Job satisfaction --4 maritaldiscord 1983 Job satisfaction -4 maritaldiscord 1988 Job satisfaction - maritaldiscord 1992 Maritaldiscord -- job satisfaction 1983 Maritaldiscord job satisfaction 1988 -4 Maritaldiscord -- job satisfaction 1992 x2 (df) CFI RMSEA Model 2 Job satisfaction -> maritaldiscord Maritaldiscord -4 job satisfaction X2(df) CFI RMSEA

b

(SE)

P

-.033* -.005 -.006 .200? .321** .323** 450.773 (106) 0.995 0.055 .010 .285** 456.076 (110) 0.994 0.054

(.013) (.014) (.014) (.113) (.104) (.098)

.085 -.011 -.013 .077 .135 .145

(.007) (.061)

.023 .127

-.048* .030 .044 -.047 -.260** -.162** 678.769 (208) 0.991 0.046 .004 -.155** 690.415 (212) 0.990 0.046

(.021) (.030) (.044) (.067) (.067) (.062)

-.072 .043 .059 -.032 -.180 -.120

(.013) (.037)

.006 -.107

Note: All analyses control for spouse 's education,durationof marriage,numberof children, spouse 's employmentstatus, respondentrace, and respondentgender.N = 1,065 (537 women and 528 men). CFI = ComparativeFit Index; RMSEA = Root Mean Square of Approximation. tp < .10. *p < .05. **p < .01.

tween job satisfaction and marital satisfaction were constrainedto be equal at all three time points, changes in job satisfactionwere not sigrelatedto changesin marital satisfaction nificantly over time. The second row of Model 2 corresponds to our second hypothesisregardingspillover from maritalsatisfaction job satisfaction. to This coefficient was positive and significant,insatisfaction were dicatingthatincreasesin marital significantlyrelatedto increasesin job satisfaction. This is consistentwith the notionof positive spillover.This model also fit the datawell, as indicatedby goodness-of-fit statistics. We compared differencein X2valuesto inthe dicate whetherthe fit of the model was signifi-

cantly improvedby



References: Arbuckle, J. (1995). Amos 3.51 for Windows. Chicago: Smallwaters MA:Harvard Press. (2nded.). Cambridge, University A. Crouter, C. (1984). Spilloverfrom family to work: The neglectedside of the work-family interface. Hu- ducedpsychologicalstateson behaviorat home.Ba- Frone,M. R., Yardley,J. K., & Markel,K. S. (1997). J. Heckman, J. (1979). Sampleselectionbias as a spec- Marital Quality and Job Satisfaction Piotrkowski, C. (1979). Work and the family system. Problems, 24, 417-424. Moen, P. (1992). Women 'stwo roles. New York:AuburnHouse. A. M., Perry-Jenkins, Repetti,R., & Crouter, C. (2000). Workand family in the 1990s. Journalof Marriage and the Family, 62, 981-998.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pt1420 Unit 6 Lab Answers

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Note: the analysis #1 a) and b) will only be demonstrated on the graphs of trial 1 for this report, trial 2-5 have approximately the same results.…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Response | |1 |3.86 |-0.0140 |-0.0512 |-0.198 |- |0.0240 |0.00704 |0.0272 |- | |2 |7.72 |0.0210 |0.0768 |0.296 |- |0.0370 |0.0109 |0.0421 |- | |3 |11.6 |0.0610 |0.223 |0.861 |- |0.0300 |0.00880 |0.0340 |- | |4 |15.4 |0.0280 |0.102 |0.394 |- |0.314 |0.0921 |0.356 |+ | |5 |19.3 |-0.0610 |-0.223 |-0.861 |- |0.0800 |0.0235 |0.0907 |- | |6 |23.2 |0.0470 |0.172 |0.664 |+ |0.0480 |0.0141 |0.0544 |- | |7 |27.0 |0.459 |1.68 |6.48 |+ |0.000 |0.000 |0.000 |- | |8 |30.9 |0.727 |2.66 |10.3 |+ |0.0240 |0.00704 |0.0272 |- | |9…

    • 1380 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    QAT task 1

    • 256 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Average material cost per unit = (33*0.04) + (35*0.05) + (38*0.12) + (39*0.79) = $38.44…

    • 256 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lab 4 Memo

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages

    -28.5 |0.4 |5.2 |0.05 |-70.5 |0.2 |2.6 |0.03 | |-0.9 |0.7 |4.5 |0.05 |-35.2 |0.7 |14.5 |0.15 | |3.2 |0.5 |5.6 |0.06 |-15.3 |0.4 |17.1 |0.17 | |25.1 |0.05 |4.6 |0.05 |26 |0.05 |35.2 |0.35 | |…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Book Exercises 11 And 16

    • 1440 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Married was the marital status mode for the experimental group and control group since it was the largest group. The frequency and percentage are 25 and 78.1% for the…

    • 1440 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Exercise 23

    • 331 Words
    • 1 Page

    7. In Table 5, two r values are reported as r = –0.498 and r = –0.528. Describe each r value in words, indicating…

    • 331 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Arch 100 Lecture 1

    • 652 Words
    • 3 Pages

    95-100% 90-94% 85-89% 80-84% 75-79% 70-74% 65-69% 60-64% 55-59% 50-54% 0 - 49% A+ A AB+ B BC+ C CD F 4.33 4.00 3.67 3.33 3.00 2.67 2.33 2.00 1.67 1.00 0.00…

    • 652 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    8 |0 |1.65 |- |- |1.05 |- |- |.90 |- | |9 |5 |1.65 |0 |.1 |.8 |.25 |.35 |1 |-.10 | |9 |10 |1.25 |.4 |.4 |.5 |.55 |.55 |.90 |0 | | |15 | | | | | | | | | | |20 | | | | | | | | | | |25 | | | | | | | | | | |30 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |[pic]…

    • 1577 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Partner s healthcare

    • 95 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Asset Class S.D. Expected Return Weight Asset Class Contribution Sharp ratio US Equity 15.21% 12.94% 24.32% 3.15% Foreign Equity 14.44% 12.42% 30.87% 3.83% Bonds 11.10% 5.40% 10.83% 0.58% REITs 13.54% 9.44% 9.91% 0.94% Commodities 18.43% 10.05% 24.07% 2.42% Total 100.00% 10.92% 0.815960738 Portfolio Mean Return 10.92% Portoflio Variance 0.90% Portfolio S.D 9.46% Calculation of Covariance (Do Not Alter Formula) Correlation Matrix US Equity Foreign Equity Bonds REITs Commodities US Equity 1 0.62 0.25 0.56 -0.02 Foreign Equity 0.62 1 0.06 0.4 0.01 Bonds 0.25 0.06 1 0.16 -0.07 REITs 0.56 0.4 0.16 1 -0.01 Commodities -0.02 0.01 -0.07 -0.01 1 Covariance Matrix US Equity Foreign Equity Bonds REITs…

    • 95 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    0.36 0.64 0.00 0.18 0.82 0.00 0.18 0.82 0.50 0.45 0.55 0.00 0.27 0.73 0.67 0.36 0.64 0.50 0.45 0.55 0.40 0.55 0.45 0.33…

    • 2005 Words
    • 58 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    = -.9306 = 1.48 get this by looking at z score area on the chart…

    • 396 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hawkins et al. (2008) found that there were limitations related to the studies done in relation to marriage and…

    • 814 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Rhetorical Analysis

    • 1735 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Do you struggle to find equilibrium between excelling at work and spending productive, quality time with loved ones at home? With the technology that is available in the twenty first century, it is now possible for educated professionals to decide whether they would like to work from home and collaborate with family members to meet work demands. Alesia Montgomery is an African American Ethnographer who wrote “Kitchen Conferences and Garage Cubicles: The Merger of Home and Work in the 24-7 Global Economy”. This study was one of many published in 2008’s book entitled The Changing Landscape of Work and Family in the American Middle Class: Reports From the Field, which focused on “providing insights into the changing nature of working families in the United States” (1008). Montgomery’s main argument is that today’s modern society and global economy have enabled families to “merge work and home in quasi-entrepreneurial ways” (1018), which will in turn deepen the attachment between family members. Her secondary claim is that the merging of these two worlds does not come without a downside; your home will no longer “serve as a refuge from job pressures” (1018) and job demands may be “made more invasive by the use of innovative communication technology” (1019). The main purpose of this essay is to identify and analyze Montgomery’s main and secondary arguments, to describe two types of support she uses, how they help her claims, and to identify her intended audience.…

    • 1735 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    couples (Doctoral dissertation, Regent University, 2005). Renshaw, K. D., Rodrigues, C. S., Jones, D. H. (2008). Psychological Symptoms and Marital…

    • 4040 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Econometrics: Exercises

    • 1186 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Report your results in equation form along with the number of observations and R2. What…

    • 1186 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays