Marc Anthony Speech Analysis
At the scene of his friend Julius Caesar (who reigned as a dictator from October 49BC till March 15, 44BC) lying dead at his feet, Mark Anthony promises to himself that his injustice death cause by the daggers of his conspirators such as Brutus who Caesar once called friends would not be forgotten and he would avenge Caesars death. This unforgettable promise was made in the play Julius Caesar written by the English play writer William Shakespeare. He portrays the character of Mark Anthony, a man who will seek revenge by persuading massive crowds with his magnificent oratory and psychological skills such as making the crowd see all the positive impact that Caesar did and using his will. These skills will bring the turning point and downfall of Brutus and the rest of the conspirators without them seeing it coming. Before starting his speech he promised the conspirators to make them look like heroes, and through-out the speech March Anthony makes them think he is on their side when in reality he is in the other side. Through-out the speech he reuses the word “honorable men” after describing an achievement of Caesar. This led the crowd to think and discover the sarcasm behind it. He then tenses the situation using more rhetorical terms which lead up to the ending of the speech. At the end of the speech Marc Anthony uses the word “traitors” to excite the crowd for revenge and let the conspirators know in which team he really is in. As mention before Marc Anthony uses different rhetorical questions to sway the crowd. He speaks of Caesars greatness defending him from Brutus statements, “Hath told you he was ambitious.” He then explains everything he did do overthrow the meaning of Brutus statement. During the second part Marc Anthony begins to tease the crowd using the will of Julius. As he restrains himself from reading it due to the cause of his unfair death it grows the need for revenge in the crowd more. In conclusion Anthony was a great man who did everything that was needed to get what he wanted and went more than beyond to reach for it.
Russia and Japan defied the pattern of nineteenth-century European domination. By 1914, they launched significant industrialization and accomplished other changes that preserved their independence. Both achieved economic autonomy and were able to join in the imperialist scramble. There were differences between the two. Japan displayed more political flexibility than did Russia. Change in Russia increased internal strains and led to revolution. Japan, through its reforms, pulled away from the rest of east Asia; Russia continued expanding its influence in eastern Europe and central Asia. Among the characteristics common to the two nations in their maintenance of independence was their prior experience of cultural imitation, Japan from China and Russia from Byzantium and the West. They were able to learn without destroying their own cultures. Both also had improved their political effectiveness during the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, a situation allowing the state to sponsor change.Russia's Reforms and Industrial Advance. Russia moved into an active period of social and political reform in 1861 that established the base for industrialization by the 1890s. Immense social strain resulted as the government attempted to remain autocratic.Russia before Reform. The French Revolution and Napoleon's invasion of 1812 produced a backlash in Russia against Westernization. Conservative intellectuals embraced the turn to isolation as a way of vaunting Russian values and institutions, including serfdom. Some intellectuals remained fascinated with Western developments in politics, science, and culture. When Western-oriented army officers fomented the Decembrist revolt of 1825, Tsar Nicholas I repressed opposition. As a consequence, Russia escaped the European revolutions of 1830 and 1848. Russia continued its territorial...