Preview

Mangement Control Systems

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
17286 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Mangement Control Systems
Management Accounting Research 23 (2012) 205–223

Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect

Management Accounting Research journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/mar

Configuring management control systems: Theorizing the integration of strategy and sustainability
Jean-Pascal Gond a,∗ , Suzana Grubnic b,1 , Christian Herzig c,2 , Jeremy Moon c,3 a b c

Cass Business School, City University, 106 Bunhill Row, EC1Y 8TZ London, UK Loughborough University, School of Business and Economics, Loughborough, Leicestershire LE11 3TU, UK Nottingham University Business School, International Centre for Corporate Social Responsibility, Jubilee Campus, Wollaton Road, Nottingham NG8 1BB, UK

a r t i c l e

i n f o

a b s t r a c t
Although organizations have embraced the sustainability rhetoric in their discourse and external reporting, little is known about the processes whereby management control systems contribute to a deeper integration of sustainability within organizational strategy. This paper addresses this gap and mobilizes a configuration approach to theorize the roles and uses of management control systems (MCSs) and sustainability control systems (SCSs) in the integration of sustainability within organizational strategy. Building on Simons’ levers of control framework, we distinguish two possible uses of a MCS and a SCS—a diagnostic use and an interactive use—and we specify the modes of MCSs and SCSs integration. We rely on these two core dimensions to identify eight organizational configurations that reflect the various uses as well as their modes of integration of SCS and MCS. We characterize these ideal-type configurations, explain their impact on the triple bottom line, and describe which mechanisms allow organizations to move from one configuration to another. In so doing, we highlight various paths toward sustainability integration or marginalization within organizations. Finally, we explain how our framework can support future research on



References: Abernethy, M.A., Brownell, P., 1999. The role of budgets in organizations facing strategic change: an exploratory study. Accounting, Organizations and Society 24 (3), 189–204. Acquier, A., 2010. CSR in search of a management model: a case of marginalization of a CSR initiative. In: Smith, C., Bhattacharya, C.B., Vogel, D., Levine, D. (Eds.), Global Challenges in Responsible Business. Cambridge University Press, pp. 107–132. Adams, C.A., 2004. The ethical, social and environmental performance–portrayal gap. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 17, 731–757. Adams, C.A., Frost, G.R., 2008. Integrating sustainability reporting into management practices. Accounting Forum 32, 288–302. Adams, C.A., Whelan, G., 2009. Conceptualising future change in corporate sustainability reporting. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 22 (1), 118–143. Ahrens, T., Chapman, C.S., 2007. Management accounting as practice. Accounting, Organizations and Society 32, 1–27. Ansoff, I.H., 1965. Corporate Strategy: An Analytical Approach to Business Policy for Growth and Expansion. McGraw-Hill, New York. Banerjee, S.B., 2008. Corporate social responsibility: the good, the bad and the ugly. Critical Sociology 34 (1), 51–79. Bansal, P., 2005. Evolving sustainability: a longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development. Strategic Management Journal 26 (3), 197–218. Bebbington, J., 2006. Accounting for sustainable development performance. Research Executive Summaries Series 2 (15). Bebbington, J., 2007. Changing organizational attitudes and culture through sustainability accounting. In: Unerman, J., Bebbington, J., O’Dwyer, B. (Eds.), Sustainability Accounting and Accountability. Routledge, London, pp. 226–242. Bechky, B.A., 2003. Sharing meaning across occupational communities: the transformation of understanding on a production floor. Organization Science 14 (3), 312–330. Berry, A.J., Coad, A.F., Harris, E.P., Otley, D.T., Stringer, C., 2009. Emerging themes in management control: a review of recent literature. British Accounting Review 41 (1), 2–20. Bhimani, A., Langfield-Smith, K., 2007. Structure, formality and the importance of financial and non-financial information in strategy development and implementation. Management Accounting Research 18 (1), 3–31. Bisbe, J., Otley, D.T., 2004. The effects of the interactive use of management control systems in product innovation. Accounting, Organizations and Society 29 (8), 709–737. Bonacchi, M., Rinaldi, L., 2007. DartBoards and clovers as new tools in sustainability planning and control. Business Strategy and the Environment 16 (7), 461–473. Botschen, S., Hahn, T., Wagner, M., 2002. OBI: Nachhaltigkeitsmanagement mit dem FOX. In: Schaltegger, S., Dyllick, T. (Eds.), Nachhaltig managen mit der Balanced Scorecard (Sustainably Managing with the Balanced Scorecard). Gabler, Wiesbaden, pp. 259–281 (only available in German). Boxenbaum, E., Jonsson, S., 2008. Isomorphism, diffusion and decoupling. In: Greenwood, R., Suddaby, R., Oliver, C., Sahlin-Anderson, K. (Eds.), Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism. Sage, pp. 78–98. Brown, J.S., Duguid, P., 1991. Organizational learning and communities-ofpractice: toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovating. Organization Science 2, 40–57. Bruining, H., Bonnet, M., Wright, M., 2004. Management control systems and strategy change in buyouts. Management Accounting Research 15 (2), 155–177. Burgelman, R.A., 1991. Intraorganizational ecology of strategy making and organizational adaptation: theory and field research. Organization Science 2, 239–262. Burke, L., Logsdon, J.M., 1996. How corporate social responsibility pays off. Long Range Planning 29 (4), 495–550. Burritt, R.L., 2004. Environmental management accounting: roadblocks in the way to the green and pleasant land. Business Strategy and the Environment 13, 13–32. Burritt, R.L., Herzig, C., Tadeo, B., 2009. Environmental management accounting for cleaner production: the case of a Philippine rice mill. Journal of Cleaner Production 17 (4), 431–439. Burritt, R., Schaltegger, S., 2001. On the Interrelationship between ecoefficiency and operational budgeting. Environmental Management and Health 12 (2), 158–174. Burritt, R.L., Schaltegger, S., 2010. Sustainability accounting and reporting: fad or trend? Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 23 (7), 829–846. Callon, M., 2009. Civilizing markets: carbon trading between in vitro and in vivo experiments. Accounting, Organization and Society 34 (3–4), 535–548. Carlyle, 2004. Transferring, translating, and transforming: an integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries. Organization Science 15 (5), 555–568. 222 J.-P. Gond et al. / Management Accounting Research 23 (2012) 205–223 Heidmann, M., Schäffer, U., Strahringer, S., 2008. Exploring the role of management accounting systems in strategic sensemaking. Information Systems Management 25 (3), 244–257. Henri, J.-F., 2006. Management control systems and strategy: a resourcebased view. Accounting, Organizations and Society 31, 529–558. Henri, J.-F., Journault, M., 2009. Revisiting the link between management control systems and strategy in contingency-based research. Paper of the Annual Conference of the Canadian Aaccounting Academic Association. Henri, J.-F., Journault, M., 2010. Eco-control: the influence of management control systems on environmental and economic performance. Accounting, Organizations and Society 35, 63–80. Herzig, C., Viere, T., Schaltegger, S., Burritt, R., 2012. Environmental Management Accounting. Case Studies of South East-Asian Companies. Routledge, London. Hoffman, A., Bazerman, M.H., 2007. Changing practices on sustainability: understanding and overcoming the organizational and psychological barriers to action. In: Sharma, S., Starik, M., Husted, B. (Eds.), Organizations and the Sustainability Mosaic. Edward Elgar Publishing. Hopwood, A.G., 1976. Accounting and Human Behavior. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ. Hopwood, A.G., 1987. The archaeology of accounting systems. Accounting, Organizations and Society 12 (3), 207–234. Hopwood, A.G., 2009. Accouting and the environment. Accounting, Organizations and Society 34 (3–4), 433–439. Hopwood, A.G., Unerman, J., Fries, J. (Eds.), 2010. Accounting for Sustainability: Practical Insights. Earthscan, London. Hubbard, G., 2009. Measuring organizational performance: beyond the triple bottom line. Business Strategy and the Environment 18 (3), 177–191. Islam, M.A., Deegan, C., 2008. Motivations for an organisation within a developing country to report social responsibility information. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 21, 850–874. Johnson, G., Langley, A., Melin, L., Whittington, R. (Eds.), 2007. Strategy as Practice: Research Directions and Resources. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. Kaplan, R., Norton, D., 1996. The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action. Harvard Business Press, Boston. Kets de Vrie, M.F.R., Miller, R., 1984. The Neurotic Organization: Diagnosing and Changing Counterproductive Styles of Management. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco. Kober, R., Ng, J., Paul, B.J., 2007. The interrelationship between management control mechanisms and strategy. Management Accounting Research 18 (4), 425–452. Kolk, A., 2003. Trends in sustainability reporting in the Fortune Global 250. Business Strategy and the Environment 12 (5), 279–291. Lamberton, G., 2005. Sustainability accounting—a brief history and conceptual framework. Accounting Forum 29 (1), 7–23. Langfield-Smith, K., 1997. Management control systems and strategy: a critical review. Accounting, Organizations and Society 22 (2), 207–232. Larrinaga-Gonzalez, C., Bebbington, J., 2001. Accounting change or institutional appropriation?—a case study of the implementation of environmental accounting. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 12 (3), 269–292. Levine, J.M., Moreland, R.L., 1991. Culture and socialization in work groups. In: Resnick, L.B., Levine, J.M., Teasdale, S.D. (Eds.), Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, pp. 257–279. MacKenzie, D., 2009. Making things the same: gas, emission rights and the politics of carbon markets. Accounting, Organization and Society 34 (3–4), 440–455. Malmi, T., Brown, D.A., 2008. Management control systems as a package—opportunities, challenges and research directions. Management Accounting Research 19 (4), 287–300. Maon, F., Lindgreen, A., Swaen, V., 2009. Designing and implementing corporate social responsibility: an integrative framework grounded in theory and practice. Journal of Business Ethics 87, 71–89. Maon, F., Lindgreen, A., Swaen, V., 2010. Organizational stages and cultural phases: a critical review and a consolidative model of corporate social responsibility development. International Journal of Management Reviews 12 (1), 21–38. Marginson, D.E.W., 2002. Management control systems and their effects on strategy formation at middle-management levels: evidence from a UK organization. Strategic Management Journal 23, 1019–1031. Markowitz, L., 2008. Can strategic investing transform the corporation? Critical Sociology 34 (5), 681–707. Chenhall, R., 2003. Management control systems design within its organizational context: findings from contingency-based research and directions for the future. Accounting, Organizations and Society 28 (2–3), 127–168. Davila, A., 2000. An empirical study on the drivers of management control systems design in new product development. Accounting, Organizations and Society 25, 383–410. Deegan, C., 2002. The legitimising effect of social and environmental disclosures—a theoretical foundation. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 15 (3), 282–311. Dias-Sardinha, I., Reijnders, L., Antunes, P., 2002. From environmental performance evaluation to eco-efficiency and sustainability balanced scorecards. Environmental Quality Management 12 (2), 51–64. Doty, D.H., Glick, W.H., 1994. Typologies as a unique form of theorybuilding: toward an improved understanding and modeling. Academy of Management Review 19 (2), 231–251. Durden, C., 2008. Towards a socially responsible management control system. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 21 (5), 671–694. Dutta, S.K., Lawson, R.A., 2009. Aligning performance evaluation and reward systems with corporate sustainability goals. Cost Management (November/December), 15–23. Elkington, J., 1997. Cannibals with Forks: The Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business. Oxford University Press, Oxford. Elsbach, K.B., Sutton, R.I., 1992. Acquiring organizational legitimacy through illegitimate actions: a marriage of institutional and impression management theories. Academy of Management Journal 35, 699–738. Emery, F.E., Trist, E.L., 1969. Socio-technical systems. In: Emery, F.E. (Ed.), Systems Thinking. Penguin, Harmondsworth, pp. 281–296. Emery, Y., Giauque, D., 2003. Sens et paradoxes de l’emploi public au XXIème siècle. Presses Polytechniques et Universitaires Romandes, Lausanne. Figge, F., Hahn, T., 2004. Sustainable value added. Measuring corporate contributions to sustainability beyond eco-efficiency. Ecological Economics 48 (2), 173–187. Figge, F., Hahn, T., Schaltegger, S., Wagner, M., 2002. The sustainability balanced scorecard—linking sustainability management to business strategy. Business Strategy and the Environment 11 (5), 269–284. Fisher, J.G., 1995. Contingency-based research on management control systems: categorization by level of complexity. Journal of Accounting Literature 14, 24–53. Fisher, J.G., 1998. Contingency theory, management control systems and firm outcomes: past results and future directions. Behavioural Research in Accounting 10 (Supplement), 47–57. Fiss, P.C., 2007. A set-theoretic approach to organizational configurations. Academy of Management Review 32 (4), 1180–1198. Fiss, P.C., 2010. Building better causal theories: a fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research. Academy of Management Journal 54 (2), 393–420. Flamholtz, E., Das, E., Tsui, A., 1985. Toward an integrative framework of organizational control. Accounting, Organizations and Society 10 (1), 35–50. Gmindner, C.U., Bergner, M., 2002. Die Weiterentwicklung der BSC bei den Berliner Wasserbetrieben. In: Schaltegger, S., Dyllick, T. (Eds.), Nachhaltig managen mit der Balanced Scorecard (Sustainably Managing with the Balanced Scorecard). Gabler, Wiesbaden, pp. 199–227 (only available in German). Godemann, J., 2008. Knowledge integration: a key challenge for transdisciplinary cooperation. Environmental Education Research 14 (6), 625–641. Gond, J.-P., Herrbach, O., 2006. Corporate social reporting as a learning tool? A theoretical framework. Journal of Business Ethics 65 (4), 359–371. Gond, J.-P., Palazzo, G., Basu, K., 2009. Reconsidering instrumental corporate social responsibility through the Mafia metaphor. Business Ethics Quarterly 19 (1), 55–58. Gond, J.-P., Krikorian, F., Cabantous, L., 2010. The double edge of strategizing: a study of institutional work and actors’ practice in the craft of corporate social responsibility. Paper presented at the European Group on Organization Studies Conference (EGOS), Lisboa, Portugal, July. Gray, R.H., 2010. Is accounting for sustainability actually accounting for sustainability and how would we know? An exploration of narratives of organisations and the planet. Accounting, Organizations and Society 35 (1), 47–62. Hart, S., 1995. A natural resource-based view of the firm. Academy of Management Review 20 (4), 986–1014. J.-P. Gond et al. / Management Accounting Research 23 (2012) 205–223 McWilliams, A., Siegel, D.S., 2001. Corporate social responsibility: a theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review 26 (1), 117–127. McWilliams, A., Siegel, D.S., 2011. Creating and capturing value: strategic corporate social responsibility, resource-based theory, and sustainable competitive advantage. Journal of Management 37 (5), 1480–1495. Meyer, J.W., Rowan, B., 1977. Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology 83, 340–363. Meyer, M.W., Zucker, L.G., 1989. Permanently Failing Organizations. Sage, Newbury Park, CA. Miles, R.E., Snow, C.C., 1978. Organizational Strategy, Structure, and Process. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY. Miller, D., 1986. Configurations of strategy and structure: toward a synthesis. Strategic Management Journal 7, 233–249. Miller, D., 1987. The genesis of configuration. The Academy of Management Review 12 (4), 686–701. Miller, D., 1990. Organizational configurations: cohesion, change, and prediction. Human Relations 43 (8), 771–789. Miller, D., 1996. Configurations revisited. Strategic Management Journal 17, 505–512. Miller, D., Whitney, J.O., 1999. Beyond strategy: configuration as a pillar of competitive strategy. Business Horizons 42 (3), 5–17. Milne, M.J., 1996. On sustainability: the environment and management accounting. Management Accounting Research 7, 135–161. Milne, M.J., Grubnic, S., 2011. Climate change accounting research: keeping it interesting and different. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 24 (8), 948–977. Mintzberg, H.T., 1979. The Structuring of Organizations. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ. Mintzberg, H.T., 1983. Structure in Lives: Designing Effective Organizations. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ. Mintzberg, H.T., 1990. The design school: reconsidering the basic premises of strategic management. Strategic Management Journal 11, 171–195. Mintzberg, H.T., Waters, J.A., 1984. Of strategies, deliberate and emergent. Strategic Management Journal 6, 257–272. Mirvis, P., Googins, B., 2006. Stages of corporate citizenship: a developmental framework. California Management Review 48 (2), 104–126. Mundy, J., 2010. Creating dynamic tensions through a balanced use of management control systems. Accounting, Organizations and Society 35 (5), 499–523. Newton, T., Harte, G., 1997. Green business: technicist kitsch? Journal of Management Studies 34 (1), 75–98. Nidumolu, R., Prahalad, C.K., Rangaswami, M.R., 2009. Why sustainability is now the key driver to innovation? Harvard Business Review 87 (September), 57–64. Nixon, W.A.J., Burns, J., 2005. Management control in the 21st century. Management Accounting Research 16 (3), 260–268. Norris, G., O’Dwyer, B., 2004. Motivating socially responsive decision making: the operation of management controls in a socially responsive organisation. British Accounting Review 36, 173–196. O’Dwyer, B., Owen, D., 2007. The reporting and assurance dimension. In: Crane, A., Matten, D., Moon, J., Siegel, D.S. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility. Oxford University Press, New York/Oxford, pp. 384–409. Oliver, C., 1992. The antecedents of deinstitutionalization. Organization Studies 13 (4), 563–588. Otley, D., 1980. The contingency theory of management accounting: achievement and prognosis. Accounting, Organizations and Society 5, 231–244. Otley, D.T., 1999. Performance management: a framework for management control system research. Management Accounting Research 10, 363–382. Ouchi, W.G., 1977. The relationship between organizational structures and organizational control. Administrative Science Quarterly 22 (1), 95–112. Parnell, J.A., 2008. Sustainable strategic management: construct, parameters, research directions. International Journal of Sustainable Strategic Management 1 (1), 35–45. 223 Porter, M.E., 1980. Competitive Strategy. Free Press, New York. Porter, M.E., Kramer, M.R., 2006. Strategy & society. The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review (December), 1–15. Roth, H.P., 2008. Using cost management for sustainability efforts. Journal of Corporate Accounting & Finance 19 (3), 11–18. Salzmann, O., Ionescu-Somers, A., Steger, U., 2005. The business case for corporate sustainability: literature review and research options. European Management Journal 23 (1), 27–36. Schaltegger, S., Burritt, R.L., 2005. Corporate sustainability. In: Folmer, H., Tietenberg, T.T. (Eds.), The International Yearbook of Environmental and Resource Economics 2005/2006. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp. 185–222. Schaltegger, S., Wagner, M., 2006. Integrative management of sustainability performance, measurement and reporting. International Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Performance Evaluation 3 (1), 1–19. Schmidt, I., Meurer, M., Saling, P., Kicherer, A., Reuter, W., Gensch, C., 2004. SEEBALANCE—managing sustainability of products and processes with the socio-eco-efficiency analysis by BASF. Greener Management International 45, 79–94. Shrivastava, P., 1994. CASTRATED environment: GREENING management studies. Organization Studies 15 (5), 705–726. Simons, R., 1990. The role of management control systems in creating competitive advantage: new perspectives. Accounting, Organizations and Society 15 (1/2), 127–143. Simons, R., 1991. Strategic orientation and top management attention to control systems. Strategic Management Journal 12, 49–62. Simons, R., 1994. How new top managers use control systems as levers of strategic renewal. Strategic Management Journal 15, 169–189. Simons, R., 1995. Levers of Control, How Managers Use Innovative Control Systems to Drive Strategic Renewal. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA. Simons, R., 2000. Performance Measurement and Control Systems for Implementing Strategy: Text and Cases. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ. Simons, R., 2006. Levers of Organization Design: How Managers Use Accountability Systems for Greater Performance and Commitment. Harvard Business School Press, Boston. Strike, V., Gao, J., Bansal, P., 2006. Being good while being bad: social responsibility and the international diversification of U.S. firms. Journal of International Business Studies 37, 850–862. Swanson, D.L., 1999. Toward an integrative theory of business and society: a research strategy for corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review 24 (3), 506–521. Thomson, I., 2007. Mapping the terrain of sustainability accounting. In: Unerman, J., Bebbington, J., O’Dwyer, B. (Eds.), Sustainability Accounting and Accountability. Routledge, London, pp. 19–36. Tuomela, T.S., 2005. The interplay of different levers of control: a case study of introducing a new performance measurement system. Management Accounting Research 16, 293–320. Vaivio, J., 2004. Mobilizing local knowledge with “proactive” non-financial measures. European Accounting Review 13, 39–71. Wagner, B., Enzler, S., 2006. Material Flow Management: Improving Cost Efficiency and Environmental Performance. Physica, Heidelberg. Watzlawick, 1979. The Language of Change. Basic Books, New York. Weber, M., (Shills, E.A., Finch, H.A., Eds. & Trans.) 1904. Max Weber on the Methodology of the Social Sciences. Free Press, Glencoe, IL. Whittington, R., 1996. Strategy as practice. Long Range Planning 29 (5), 731–735. Whittington, R., 2007. Strategy practice and strategy process: family differences and the sociological eye. Organization Studies 28 (10), 1575–1586. Widener, S.K., 2007. An empirical analysis of the levers of control framework. Accounting, Organizations and Society 32, 757–788. Zadek, S., 2004. The path to corporate responsibility. Harvard Business Review 82 (12), 125–132. Zheng, X., 2010. Sensemaking, institutions and crises of legitimacy: the case of Nike’s sweatshop. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. Nottingham University Business School.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Csr David Vogel Summary

    • 299 Words
    • 2 Pages

    David Vogel explains how stakeholders, mainly employees, customers, and investors can impact the significance of Corporate Sustainable Responsibility (CSR) in business. Even though many surveys had been conducted to assess and boost businesses to be more sustainable, there is still a lack of evidence on the actual actions and effects.The complication of measuring social as well as environmental implication through a single standard has left CSR to be neglected. GRI is an example that encourages CSR but lacks conformity for reported results. This difficulty in measuring social and environmental outcomes often lead organizations to undertake ‘greenwashing’, or act as charity donors to cover up their ‘irresponsibility.’…

    • 299 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Haugh, H. M., & Talwar, A. (2010). How Do Corporations Embed Sustainability Across the Organization?. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 9(3), 384-396. doi:10.5465/AMLE.2010.53791822…

    • 2033 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Best Essays

    Walgreens Strategic Analysis

    • 2614 Words
    • 11 Pages

    We will provide the most convenient access to consumer goods and services . . .…

    • 2614 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Best Essays

    RWT1 Essay

    • 2603 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Smith, Alan D. (2007). Making the case for the competitive advantage of corporate social responsibility. Business Strategy Series, 8 (3), 190. DOI: 10.1108/17515630710684187…

    • 2603 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    6. Ahlrichs, F. Controlling of Sustainability: How to manage a sustainable business. Journal of Organizational Transformation & Soicial Change, 9(3), 141-153.…

    • 1644 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Wheelen, J., Hunger, J. (2010). Concepts in Strategic Management and Business Policy Achieving Sustainability, Twelfth Edition. Retrieved on December 8, 2012 from: https://ecampus.phoenix.edu/content/eBookLibrary2/content/eReader.aspx?assetMetaId=b34ef093-02c4-4e0f-a927-da2ee4e8ef25&assetDataId=6f8913a4-d17f-491a-8a93-cdd0845e01ac&assetpdfdataid=6c4c8e0a-877e-436b-9e90-48a4d6d51afa.…

    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sustainable Solutions

    • 11913 Words
    • 48 Pages

    much below the line, particularly in the lower left quadrant (cost and risk reduction), where most companies start. The lower right quadrant involves stakeholders that attempt to hold organizations accountable. The success of this quadrant for Walmart warrants further research as well as those located above the line. Though growth has been a definite strategy in years past for Walmart, sustainable growth is altogether different. Meznar, Chriman & Caroll’s (1990) discussion on enterprise strategy and corporate social responsibility, also define the success of a sustainable organization as an essential part of its strategic management. Specifically, “strategic management theory, suggests, superior performance comes from successful implementation of a strategy that matches organization skills and resources with environmental opportunity in ways that create competitive advantage”, (Meznar, Chrisman, &…

    • 11913 Words
    • 48 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Stead, EW, Stead, GJ, Starik, M 2004 'Sustainable strategic management ', M.E. SharpeInc., New York.…

    • 2531 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Accounting as a changing phenomenon: Now a day’s accounting is not just dealing with organizational aspect but new accounting aspects are also included like environmental or social accounting, such as Corporate Social responsibility. In developed countries like Scandinavian and other European companies, all have to allocate some cost for social and environmental aspects and are held accountable. Now it is necessary for an organization to keep environmental aspect into its mind and be friendly with environment. It is due to society’s pressure that drags organizations to change their basic objective from profit making to socially hold responsible for their economic activities. Management practices such as mass production to achieve economies of scale had increased pollution hence increased pressure on them by society such as environmental activist, people living near factories, government policies of being environmental friendly ,to minimize the pollution to add environmental accounting into management practices.…

    • 895 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cited: Wheelen, Thomas L., and J. David Hunger. Strategic Management and Business Policy: Toward Global Sustainability. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall, 2012. Print.…

    • 1915 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2004). Strategy Maps: Converting Intangible Assets into Tangible Outcomes. Boston: Harvard Business School Press. Laszlo, C. (2003). The sustainable company: How to create lasting value through social and environmental performance. Washington: Island press. Mintzberg, H., Ahlstrand, B., & Lampel, J. (1998). Strategy Safari. Sydney: Prentice Hall. Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage. The Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242-246. Neuman, W. L. (2003). Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches (5th ed.). Sydney: Allyn and Bacon. North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Melbourne: Cambridge University Press. Peng, M. W. (2002). Towards an institution-based view of business strategy. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 19(2,3), 251. Peng, M. W. (2005). Perspectives - From China to global strategy. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 22, 123-141. Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The External Control of Organisations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. New York: Harper & Row, Publishers. Porter, M. E. (1979). How competitive forces shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 57(2), 137. Post, J. E., Preston, L. E., & Sachs, S. (2002a). Managing the extended enterprise: the new stakeholder view. California Management Review, 45(1), 6-28. Post, J. E., Preston, L. E., & Sachs, S. (2002b). Redefiningg the corporation. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press. Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review(May-June), 79-91. Priem, R. L. & Butler, J. E. (2001) Is the resource-based "view" a useful perspective for strategic management research? Academy of Management. The Academy of Management Review, 26 (1), 22-40. Rumelt, R. P. (1984). Toward a strategic theory of a firm. In R. Lamb (Ed.), Competitive Strategy Management (pp. 556-570). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.…

    • 5235 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    This paper is a review of the empirical contingency-based literature regarding the development and structure of management control systems. It categorizes the literature by topic: meaning of MCS, outcomes of MCS, and contextual variables including external environment, technology, organizational structure, size, strategy, and national culture. The paper provides a thorough review of studies that examine these topics. Additionally, Chenhall provides recommendations for future research.…

    • 1491 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Given that sustainability reporting is not currently required of companies, what do you see as the possible benefits and disadvantages of sustainability reporting? Using the information in the case, the summary data reported in Tables 4 and 5, and Johnson & Johnson’s most recent sustainability report (available at http://www.jnj.com/connect/caring/?flash=true), what aspects of sustainability reporting seem to be a priority for the company, and why? Provide examples from the 2008 sustainability report to support your answers. 1. How are various management systems such as human resource management, costs, capital budgeting, and performance measurement incorporated into Johnson & Johnson’s sustainability reporting process? Support your answer with specific references from the 2008 report (link provided in question 1). Compare your sources with those in the GRI’s reporting framework (http://www.globalreporting.org/ReportingFramework/G3Online/), and the performance measures with Epstein’s metrics presented in Table 3. 2. When compiling data for its sustainability reports, Johnson & Johnson does not request direct input from its managerial accounting staff. What should be the role of management accountants in collecting and reporting sustainability data? Could Johnson & Johnson’s sustainability reporting be improved with input from managerial accountants? Why or why not? (The Crawford 2005 article at http://www.managementmag.com/index.cfm/ci_id/2149/la_id/1 provides additional background material.) 3. Do you agree with the statement that Johnson & Johnson’s approach to sustainability reporting is beyond triple bottom line? Why or why not? 4. Johnson & Johnson cites concerns with determining materiality as one reason it does not declare itself in accordance with GRI guidelines. What is meant by materiality and why is materiality difficult to determine for social responsibility issues?…

    • 269 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    References: Andriof & McIntosh (2001). Perspectives on Corporate Citizenship, Greenleaf, UK. Burns & Stackler (1961). The Management of Innovation, London. Buzzel, R. D. (1987). The PIMS principles. New York: Free Press. Chapmann, C.S. (1997). "Reflections On a Contingency View in Accounting", Accounting, Organisation and Society, vol. 22. Crosby (1980). Quality is Free, Mentor, London. Dale, G.D. (1999). Managing Quality, 3rd Edition, Blackwell Business. Hofstede, G. (1984). Culture´s Consequences: International Differences in WorkRelated Values, Beverly Hills, US. IWAY (2000). Internal IKEA document. Juran, J. A. M. (1988). Quality Control Handbook. McGraw-Hill, New York. Mintzberg, H. (1983). Structures in five - Designing Effective Organisations, PrenticeHall. Mintzberg et al. (1998). Strategy Safari. Prentice Hall. Neergaard, P. (1998). Management Accounting and Uncertainty, Samfundslitteratur, Copenhagen. Neergaard, P. & Klamer, B. (2001). Factors Leading to Excellence in Environmental Management, paper in review, Copenhagen Bus. School. Neergaard, P. (2002). A contingency Approach to Quality Management, to be published in the Scandinavian Journal of Management. Vol. 18. Oakland, J.S. (1993). Total Quality Management, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford. Schary, P. & Skjøtt-Larsen (2001). Managing the Global Supply Chain, Copenhagen Bus. School Press.…

    • 4208 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Environmental performance, as defined by the impending ISO 14031, is the company's achievement in managing any interaction between the company's activities, products or services and the environment (ISO 1997). Improvement of environmental performance thus implies that the company has minimised the relative environmental impact of its activities, products or services. Based on the use of performance measurement in traditional management accounting, environmental performance measures are (Horngren and Sundem 1993): * Attention-directing, as they point to problems and indicate which problems are to be given priority * Used in problem-solving, as they (should) enable environmental managers to choose between possible solutions and evaluate possible outcomes * Used in keeping track of activities and results--i.e, scorecard-keeping…

    • 528 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Good Essays