Preview

Mandatory Minimum Sentences and Drug Policy Reform

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
3198 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Mandatory Minimum Sentences and Drug Policy Reform
Mandatory Minimum Sentences and Drug Policy Reform
Andrew Foguth
Davenport University

Abstract The use of mandatory minimums within our judicial system is not winning the war on drugs. This country needs drug law reforms to turn the tide on the war on drugs, and minimize their impact on our society. This comes from rehabilitation programs that are more effective and less costly for our government.

Introduction
Our country has gone to extremes to try and win the war on drugs. There is no evidence to show that they have made any real impact in ending or even lowering the use of drugs in this country. In1986 the federal government enacted mandatory minimum drug sentences. These laws force judges to comply with a minimum prison sentence based on the nature of the drug crime. By doing this, the federal government has tied the hands of our judges to use their judgment depending on the case. Their argument for this is it will deter people from committing drug crimes in the future. My argument is that we are treating an addiction which needs both medical and psychological help to resolve, not longer prison sentences.
Argument for Mandatory Minimums
In 1986 mandatory minimums were enacted to put an end to the cocaine and crack epidemic that was going on in our nation’s inner cities. The focus was if they could apprehend the drug kingpins and lock them away for many years in prison, they would lose their realm of control of the drug world. The reality of the situation is that many gang leaders are in prison today, and have just as much control over the drug trade as they did when they were free men. Many say that the laws have inadvertently become a racial problem within this country. Laws on mandatory minimum sentences are much harsher on crack than cocaine. Since crack is predominantly used among African Americans within this country, they received much harsher punishments than cocaine



References: 12 Step Program. (2008). Retrieved September 21, 2008, from Treatment 4 Addiction: http://www.treatment4addiction.com/recovery/12-step-programs Mandatory Minimums Walters, J. P. (n.d.). Drug Policy Information Clearing House. Retrieved September 21, 2008, from ONDCP: http://www.whitehousedrugpolicy.gov/publications/factsht/crime/index.html Walters, J What is Cocaine? (n.d.). Retrieved September 21, 2008, from Drug Rehabs: Connecting People With People Who Can Help: http://www.drug-rehabs.com/cocaine-rehab.htm Whats Wrong with the War on Drugs

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Minimum mandatory sentences have been established since the inception of our criminal justice system. However, these laws have gained much-needed attention as of late due to the ripple effect it has caused relating to the war on drugs. The war on drugs have been going on since the 1980s, but the use of these laws have created bigger problems in poor communities. These laws have hindered the progression of families and communities. Minimum mandatory sentences are not an effective tool in combatting the issue of controlled substances abuse and trafficking and should be repealed.…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Prison-Industrial Complex

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The War on Drugs and mandatory sentencing laws have also created an increase in prison population, which in turn, make more profits those invested in it. These laws are designed to increase the likelihood of offenders going to prison and staying there for a long time, and they all hit hardest in low income and minority communities.…

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As noted, drug crimes have mostly disadvantaged minorities in inner-city communities. The mandatory minimums created a round-up effect that many believed to do with the decline in criminal rates since the early 1990s. However, this decline mirrors that of Canada, whose prison population was actually declining in comparison to the rise of incarceration in the United States (Smith, Goggin and Gendreau 2002).…

    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As of 1984 the Congress has passed a mandatory minimum sentences which required extensive prison sentences for drug, weapons, and violent offenses. According Baker (2009) more than 80% of drug cases and 95% of offenders incarcerated were overseen by the federal government. After the changes in these drug laws caused the rate of imprisonment in the federal level to skyrocket. Of the all the drug cases brought to the federal government, most of the offenders received 15 years or more, especially if it was a crack cocaine. According Taxy, Samuels, and Adams (2015) cocaine accounts for more than half (54%) of the drug offenders in federal prison and it carried the largest sentence in the federal government. The race of drug offenders varies but the largest population of crack cocaine offender are more likely to be African Americans, 88% This included the use, trafficking, or possession of crack cocaine. The ones that don’t go directly to prison maybe get sentenced to probation, little jail time or fined. Lynch (2012) states that the United States policies towards the prison pipeline is worse than any other countries.…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Clearly there are several issues of Mandatory Minimum sentences. Moreover, there is evidence that says it decreases drug possession and violence, federal judges can argue otherwise. Often, innocent people go to jail for harmless acts for an unreasonable amount of time in jail, for a one time use or a non-violent act of drug use. If federal court systems continue laws of Mandatory Minimum sentences, they need to question and use evidence to support whether the individual is really guilty or innocent.…

    • 82 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Think about that.” Mandatory minimums are an outdated, destructive policy that the U.S. never has, and never will need. In order to reform our criminal justice system, and ensure that the people who go to prison are there for a time that’s proportional to the crime they commit, we must get rid of mandatory minimums. Aside from the harm they cause to the prisoner, law-abiding American taxpayers are burdened by the unnecessary cost of keeping people in prisons for much longer than is needed. Of course, mandatory minimums are far from the only problem within the U.S. criminal justice system, however, abolishing these ridiculous laws will help thousands of current American prisoners, as well as innumerable future offenders. Overall, mandatory minimum sentencing policy must be ended in the near future, should America hold true to its values of “freedom and justice for…

    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Drugs itself would not have destroyed a community so easily like policy and procedure have. The drugs that did not ruin a community, the war against them has. Mandatory minimum sentencing statutes allowed the war on drugs to increase incarceration and continue to fail. By judges being required to impose sentencing based on legal factors and extra-legal factors are unfair. This allowed life sentencing to be unjust and prison to be…

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is simply ineffective and inappropriate for states to focus only on new drug legislation. Twenty-three states have recently repealed drug penalties, including revision or even elimination of mandatory minimums, reclassifying what constitutes a drug offense, revising sentencing enhancements (being convicted of the same crime twice results in harsher penalties the second time), modifying sentencing guidelines, establishing gender-specific pre-trial assessments, and authorizing risk-reduction sentencing (Gelb). Unfortunately, as these 23 states lowered their penalties, 14 states both…

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tough On Crime Mentality

    • 870 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The “tough on crime” mentality, as discussed in class, can be dangerous. On the surface, it sounds good. It is an admirable goal to have to eliminate crime and “clean up the streets,” but there are issues with the execution. One issue with the “tough on crime mentality” is that it takes a complex social phenomenon and offers a simple solution, mandatory minimum sentencing. Mandatory minimum sentencing takes away from the complex nature of crime by suggesting harsh sentences for all. Often, harsh sentencing is not always what is needed. Some offenders do not need to be in prison for 25 years on drug charges, some offenders need not be in prison at all. But with the “tough on crime” mentality taken on by many politicians, the laws in place sentence everyone extremely harshly.…

    • 870 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Since the establishment of the laws concerning the illegal drug trade, the entities involved at the Federal level have been involved in a multi-national effort to curb the importation, as well as exportation of illegal drugs. Enforcement actions have caused alarm at many levels, because of the number of policy driven incarcerations (mandatory sentences), even for those who are involved in mere possession of limited amounts. Critics have long been heard calling for an end to criminalization of use, and more focus be placed on the treatment of use and abuse instead. According to a summary of professional opinions provided by William Martin, the war on drugs has failed and merely filled the prisons without focusing on diminishing the illegal drug…

    • 554 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Regulation Vs Prohibition

    • 902 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In 1930, Herbert Hoover created the Federal Bureau of Narcotics whose duty was to police drug use. This agency was well known for vigorously prosecuting drug crimes. Then in 1971, President Richard Nixon declared “War on Drugs.” Because many of our young American soldiers were bringing drugs back from Vietnam, Nixon proclaimed drugs as “public enemy number one.” Under President Reggan the government’s slogan became “just say no” to drugs or face criminal charges. However, Nixon’s War on Drugs while encompassing education, treatment, enforcement and prosecution would end up costing American taxpayers more than $50 billion a year. In the 1980’s, the prison population greatly increased due to stiffer penalties for drug related crimes President Bill Clinton advocated treating drugs abusers instead of putting them in jail. However, after just a few months in office, he had reverted to previous drug war strategies. President George W. Bush allocated more money than ever to the war on drugs and even appointed a drug czar, John Walters. The Bash administration established an increase in domestic drug law enforcement. Then when President Obama took office, he began advocating for reforms. His policy was to increase treatment programs for drug users rather than incarcerating them. President Obama believes we can have a future where “drug policies are shaped by science and compassion rather than political hysteria.” (“A Brief History of the Drug…

    • 902 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As I learned more about the War, I realized that drug prohibition causes more societal harm than good, and it is possible for people to use recreational drugs responsibly. We must admit defeat in the War on Drugs, before one of your family members, or friends, or your significant other is arrested and sent to prison for a non-violent drug offense, probably facing a harsh minimum sentence of a couple years and a felony hindering their post-release…

    • 283 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Being thrown in jails and institutions has proven over the years to be an ineffective treatment of substance abuse. Clearly there is an issue with the judicial system and its policies regarding addiction. Although the legal system has clear guidelines for punishments, it is still left to the addict to seek out resources to rehabilitate from drugs. Everyone should be very concerned by the staggering statistic of 129 deaths a day from drug overdoses. American’s should not ignore the fact that it is unlikely that drugs will disappear from this country all together, as has been the goal of the government since 1914. Luckily there is harm reduction and rehabilitation which have proven to be effective in other countries, such as Portugal according to statistics from the Drug Policy Alliance. When Americans are found by authorities in possession of drugs they are thrown in jail to be punished by the outdated system. There is little evidence that these punishments are discouraging individuals from repeating the same behaviors. Americans are turning their heads from to this issue instead of talking about what could be done to keep the numbers from rising. Let America live in the solution and not just sit in the problem.…

    • 956 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Should Drug Be Legalized?

    • 1366 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Drug legalization need to be executed because drug wars are of little avail. These drug wars have been spending too much citizen 's money with only a little pay back. Government should not continue wasting the money pointlessly with the hope that “we could actually hold drug use level or see it decline” (Johnson 283) one day in the future inasmuch as this money should be used to decrease the other crimes too for the benefits of all residents but not only for the junkies who actually embarrass the country. Though government claims that the drug wars work according to the increasing rates of captured people who relate to drug, we can see that the money spending on it increasing too. For instance, the federal government spend one billion dollar to arrest few hundred thousand people in late 1970s but nineteen billion dollar…

    • 1366 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Drug war

    • 625 Words
    • 2 Pages

    This is outrageous, this is the reason why the war cannot be won because innocent people are arrested for taking these drugs instead of the people who are making them and supplying them. New York Times Author, Dan Baldacci quoted " With less drugs, it allows the people and economy to grow in a positive direction. Less homelessness, dependency, crimes, and jail sentencing would be the direct result of tougher drug policies. If we are serious about a war on drugs, then we have to subject them to regulations and controls that minimise as far as possible their ability to do harm.” I think he is absolutely right because with prevention comes it makes goals easier to tackle.…

    • 625 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics