Preview

Mandatory Life without Parole for Juveniles

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1989 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Mandatory Life without Parole for Juveniles
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Currently, over 2,500 people are serving a life sentence without the option of parole for crimes committed as adolescents. Fortunately, this policy is not considered in all states. Twelve states have discontinued life sentences without the option of parole for juveniles. Almost two- thirds of life without parole sentences for juveniles (JLWOP) happens in five states. Seventy-three children were ages 13 or 14 at time that their crime was committed. Research has been conducted that proves the vast difference in brain development of a child compared to an adult. Society does not allow minors to purchase cigarettes or alcohol, enlist into the military or enter into a legal binding agreement such as an apartment lease until the age of 18 or older because of the knowledge that minors are not mature enough to make certain decisions. However, when a minor commits homicide we allow them to be sentenced as an adult and disregard their partial brain development and decreased culpability. It is the responsibility of society to protect our children from cruel and unusual punishment such as juvenile life without parole sentences. The policy brief will give a history of the juvenile justice system, trends, and current state. Brief will also address importance of the problem and recommendations for reform of this policy.

CONTEXT AND IMPORTANCE OF THE PROBLEM

Almost everyone would agree that children are the core of our future. Therefore, it is imperative that we have laws/policies in place that will protect them from cruel and unusual punishment in any capacity. However, much debate continues to arise concerning mandatory life in prison without the possibility of parole for juvenile offenders. In attempting to change a social policy concerning the juvenile justice system it is important to address the concern in its context. Therefore, reviewing the history of the juvenile justice system is imperative when attempting to understand the system in its current

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    By the nineteenth century, many child welfare advocates reformed the country’s view on children, and the states found it counter productive to convict children along with adults. States then recognized that minors are indeed young enough to be rehabilitated. Thus being said, the United States began discussing the idea of a separate justice system specifically for juvenile cases. In 1925 an official juvenile system has been established in the United States. “Juvenile courts do not exist to punish children for their transgressions against society…The aim of the court is to provide individualized justice for children…The delinquent is the child of, rather than the enemy of society and their interests coincide.” (Ogilvie at p.…

    • 1946 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Historically, children have been regarded as constitutionally different from adults. This fact is evident in the way past cases have been decided. Certain juvenile characteristics such as their “ immaturity, impetuosity, and failure to appreciate risks and consequences” illustrates the clear discrepancy between children and adults. Furthermore, the majority contend that instances that call for punishment as severe as life imprisonment without parole will be exceedingly uncommon and rare. Requiring that all juvenile convicted of homicide are sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole regardless of age or other mitigating factors violates the principle of proportionality.…

    • 1029 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Miller vs Alabama

    • 1283 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Supreme Court reviewed the constitutionality of mandatory life sentences without parole enforced upon persons aged fourteen and younger found guilty of homicide. The court declared unconstitutional a compulsory sentence of life without parole for children. The states have been barred from routinely imposing sentences based on the crime committed. There is a requirement for individual consideration of the child life circumstance or the defendant status as a child. The court rejected the definite ban on life sentences without parole. This is because in some cases the instances may be uncommon, but jurors can find irreparably corrupted children. The Supreme Court declined to decide the subject whether there is age below which children with life sentences without parole is unconstitutional.…

    • 1283 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Children make mistakes from time to time, and haven’t you ever heard the term “we are only human.” Well now that’s we are in 2013, we can acknowledge the fact that locking up a teen for life without parole violates our constitutions eighth amendment. Took us a while, but with the last three court cases, (Graham vs. Florida, Miller vs. Alabama, Roper vs. Simmons) they have all helped us shed a different look on Juvenile punishment in the past seven years. With the help of scientific research we can distinguish the fact that children don’t have the maturity set to make rational decisions on their own, are often pushed by peer pressure, adolescents don’t tend to consider future consequences, and the child’s vulnerability to external influences. These traits are what the court found to set children apart from adults and are to be handed down a differential punishment than adults when it comes to such serious crimes such as life without parole or the death penalty.…

    • 1232 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This paper will examine the history of the Juvenile Court system and its intended purposes, the history of capital punishment being used against minors, court decisions both in limiting capital punishment for youthful offenders, as well as upholding states rights to sentence juveniles to death. Most importantly, we will analyze possible factors that contributed to the decision of Roper v Simmons such as the international community's opposition of the juvenile death penalty and the majority consensus of the American public in outlawing this practice.…

    • 3690 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Data has shown that out of the 192 countries in the United Nations that the only countries that still allows juvenile offenders to be sentenced to life imprisonment without parole is the United States and Somalia (Yun, 2011). Soon the U. S. will be alone in on having this ability because Somalia has implicated that they will soon adapt to the CRC. The United States delegation has said to the United Nations that they will only use the sentence of life imprisonment without parole for only particular cases and that the sentence is reserved for only the worst offenders. This process has not been followed and has been shown in cases such as People v Petty. In the case of People v Petty, Petty was sent to prison for life at the age of fifteen for encouraging his twelve year old accomplice to kill their victim (Yun, 2011). The United States seems to be alone on having the ability to sentence juveniles to life in prison without parole, and in a 2008 study it is show that roughly .02 percent of offenders serving life without parole were juveniles when they committed the crime. (Pilfer,…

    • 1880 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Juveniles have been incarcerated in secure facilities since 1974. Juveniles are committing more heinous crimes and citizens have advocated for tougher penalties on crime. They want justice for the violence perpetrated on their families, businesses and communities. The Juvenile Justice system is charged with simultaneously protecting the public as well as reforming those juveniles who are convicted and sentenced to secure facilities. Barry C. Feld (1995) believes that there is a “desire to "get tough," fueled in part by frustration with the intractability of crime, that provides political impetus to transfer some young offenders to criminal courts for prosecution as adults and to strengthen the sanctioning powers of juvenile courts”(p.966).…

    • 300 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In today’s society, there is a national debate about what to do with juveniles in the criminal justice system. This debate is a result changes in practice throughout United States. The United States made it possible to try juveniles as adults in court after the case of Kent vs. the United States in 1966. The change in legislation is relatively new due to the fact that juvenile courts have "for most of the past century, treated youngsters between 7 and 17 not as criminals but as delinquents." The United States choose to treat the kids as delinquents because there was a major focus on rehabilitation rather than punishment.…

    • 4926 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Before 1980, life without parole was very rarely imposed on children. In today’s society we are consumed with the idea of keeping everyone safe; this has led to a high incarceration rate, especially with minors. In America, currently 2,225 minors are sentenced to life without parole before they turn eighteen. The criminal justice system works on a three strike system, which means you have three minor offenses before you go to jail. Also with the strikes, you are judged on if your crime was of passion or pre-meditated. In the past the issue in judging each situation was that sometimes “children” or minors were charged as adults, due to mandatory minimum sentencing. This is no longer the issue because in 2012, the Supreme Court case (Miller v. Alabama) found mandatory minimum sentencing unconstitutional under the 8th amendment, (which bans cruel and unusual punishments). The problem now is what the Supreme Court forgot to address in there ruling; does this ruling apply to the roughly three hundred adults serving life without parole that were sentenced as juveniles. Adolfo Davis is the leading case that is addressing…

    • 640 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Justice means that the punishment should fit the crime. Justice means allowing our fellow Americans that made mistakes and paid their debt to society and rejoin their community as active rehabilitated citizens.” These are the words spoken by former United States President Obama during his movement to reform the criminal justice system. The main focus of this reform was to target the juvenile aspect of punishment, specifically life sentencing against juvenile offenders. I believe that yes punishment should fit the crime, but to sentence a juvenile to a life sentencing without parole is something that the United States should be ashamed of doing for all these years before the true decision to disband this in 2012.…

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The U.S. stands alone as the only country that sentence people to life without parole for crimes committed turning 18. Most of the approximately 3,000 individuals sentenced to life without possibility of parole now have a chance for release in the wake of recent Supreme Court decisions. The choice to allow teenagers to receive the harshest available sentence is not shared among all states. I believe they should receive life without parole if they committed any murder because it is the law and they broke it. Also another reason, is because it is the victim and the family of the victims right to press charges. Lastly, they are deterrent to crime under the age of 18. Nineteen states and the district of Columbia do not have any prisoners serving life without parole for crimes committed as juveniles, either due to laws prohibiting the sentence or because there are no individuals serving the sentence at this time.…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Mary Elliott, I agree that the punishment must fit the crime regardless of the age but there are other things to consider such as giving the death penalty or life without parole for the juvenile who has committed a violent murder intentionally. Mental Health America feels that juvenile offenders should not be given the death penalty or life without parole because these sentences are inconsistent with the purposes that normally guide sentencing such as deterrence, retribution, incapacitation, or rehabilitation (Position statement 58, 2017).…

    • 222 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Juvenile Justice

    • 4585 Words
    • 14 Pages

    Juvenile justice was created in the late 1800’s as reform to U.S. policies with regards to youth offenders. Over time, through various amendments directed at protecting both the due process rights of youth, and creating an averse effect in relation to jail among youth offenders, juvenile justice created a system similar to that of the adult justice system, an alteration from the original intentions of the United States. “The long-standing mission of juvenile justice has been to correct youthful offenders so that they will neither return to the juvenile justice system nor continue on into the life of an adult criminal” (Bartollas & Miller, 2008, Ch. 16, pg. 352). There has been a number of strategies and interventions tried in order to accomplish these goals either through rehabilitation or justice, but whether or not they have worked, has depended mainly on the circumstances surrounding the victim(s), offenders and the community. In this paper we will discuss the history of the juvenile. We will also discuss the best strategies and interventions designed to prevent juvenile delinquency, but not limited to: an exhaustive examination of all stakeholders to juvenile delinquency and a comprehensive list and weighing of alternatives, both pro and con, to the strategies/interventions proposed to stop juvenile delinquency, justice, and possible prediction of how juvenile justice will be handled in the next two decades.…

    • 4585 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wrongdoing In America

    • 412 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Across the United States, thousands of children have been sentenced as adults, estimating at about 3,000 nationwide that have been sentenced to life imprisonment without the possibility of parole (Pollock). As young as the age of 13 years old, children are being tried as adults and sentenced to “die in prison”, without any consideration of their age or offense. Many young children in America are affected by abuse, neglect, domestic and community violence, and poverty. For many of these youth the act of wrongdoing is a cry for help. Without effective intervention and help, a majority of these children suffer and struggle to maintain any type of stability in their lives. For many kids, these unstable environments make it difficult to manage the…

    • 412 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This paper shows the interworkings, arguements, and justifications of the death penalty in the united states for juveniles convicted of a crime and sentenced to death row before the age of 18. The death penalty was legal for juveniles in several states until 2005, when the supreme court ruled 5-4 to outlaw the death penalty of juveniles on the basis of the 8th amendment's no cruel or unusual punishment. An example of the death penalty applying to a minor can be seen with the case of TJ Lane, a seventeen year old at the time of his crime, and therefore; unelligible for death row. The paper willl outline a brief overview of the laws regarding the death penalty, a synopsis of the history of the death penalty, the evidence for the arguements, and the contradictions involving juvenile death penalty.…

    • 452 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays