Preview

Machiavelli and Humanism

Best Essays
Open Document
Open Document
6988 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Machiavelli and Humanism
ROBERT DODSON

REPUBLICAN AND LIBERTY IN THE WESTERN WORLD: AN ESSAY ON THE PRINCIPLES FOR LEADERSHIP AND RULE SEEN IN THE WORK OF NICCOLO MACHIAVELLI

How far is Machiavelli and advocate of a republic and republicanism?

INTRODUCTION The History of Republics and Republicanism has been interpreted in numerous ways leading to the ambiguity seen in the modern world of what a republic really stands for and what are its principles. The same can also be said about Niccolo Machiavelli. His work The Prince has been interpreted in many different fashions since its publication in 1532 and has led to Machiavelli’s name being used as a synonym for evil. The Discourses on Livy however have shown that Machiavelli’s republican ideals can produce a positive and industrious form of government. The argument put forward that Machiavelli’s Discourse are synonymous with Thomas More’s Utopia is how the effectiveness of these republican ideals was on the citizens of Florence. The main structure of this essay revolves around the idea that the Discourses is an ideal form of government whereas The Prince is a piece of political action, which will be discussed in such context in section IV, that acts upon the actual realities of primarily Florentine life and the Italian state system. This essay will contain five sections which deal with a vast array of issues crucial to understanding the political mind-set of Machiavelli. It is important to understand Machiavelli’s perception of theorists such as Plato, Aristotle, Polybius and Cicero as his interpretation of their thought is what lays the foundations for his own, classical republican style. The idea of Civic Humanism in relation to Classical Republicanism will be shown through the changing political sphere of Machiavelli’s Florence and how he adapted certain strands of this to form Civic Humanism.
Section I of this essay examines how political liberties and freedom are exploited, constrained on one hand, and on the other



Bibliography: Machiavelli, Niccolo, The Prince, (London: Penguin, 1999) Machiavelli, Niccolo, The Art of War, (N/A) Machiavelli, Niccolo, Gilbert, Allan, and Plamenatz, John (eds.), ‘The Prince’, selections from the ‘Discourses’ and other writings, (London: Fontana, 1972) Plato, The Republic, translated with an introduction by Desmond lee, (London: Penguin, 1987) SECONDARY SOURCES Arendt, Hannah, The Human Condition, (Chicago: 1958) Forde, Steven, ‘Varieties of Realism: Thucydides and Machiavelli’, The Journal of Politics, Vol. 54, No. 2, (1992), pp. 372-393 Gilmore, Myron P., The world of Humanism 1453-1517, (New York: Harper & Row, 1952) Hankins, James, ‘Exclusivist Republicans and the non-Monarchical Republic’, Political Theory, Vol. 38, No. 4, (2010), pp. 452-482 Hisks, Richard P., ‘Hume and Machiavelli: Political realism and Liberal thought’, Hume Studies, Vol Langton, John, ‘Machiavelli’s Liberal Republican legacy’, Perspectives on Politics, Vol. 4, No. 4, (2006), pp. 762-763 Lcahigh, James F., ‘Precursor of Fascism’, The Washington Post 1923-1954, (1936), pg Mansfield, Harvey C., Machiavelli’s virtue, (Chicago: Chicago University press, 1996) McCormick, John P., ‘Machiavelli against Republicanism: On the Cambridge schools “Guiccardinian Moments”’, Political Theory, Vol McCormick, John P., ‘Machiavelli’s political trials and “The freeway of life”, Political Theory, Vol. 35, No. 4, (2007), PP. 385-411 Mindle, Grant B., ‘Machiavelli’s Realism’, The review of politics, Vol Mohlo, Anthony, and Tedeschi, John A., Renaissance studies in Honor of Hans Baron, (Illinois: Northern Illinois University press, 1971) ‘Mussolini’s High Hand’, Chicago Daily Tribune 1923-1963, (1925), pg Pangle, Thomas L., The spirit of modern Republicanism, (Chicago: University of Chicago press, 1990), pg. 52 Parkin, John, ‘Machiavelli, Hobbes, & The formation of a Liberal Republicanism in England’, The Scriblerian and the Kit-Cats, Vol Pasquino, Pasquale, ‘Machiavelli and Aristotle: The anatomies of the city’, History of European ideas, Vol. 35, No. 4, (2009), pp. 397-407 Pettit, Philip, Republicanism: A theory of freedom and government, (Oxford: 2000) Riebling, Barbara, ‘Representations of the State in Paradise Lost’, Renaissance Quarterly, Vol. 49, No. 3, (1996), pg. 573 Shumer, S.M., ‘Machiavelli Republican Politics and its Corruption’, Political Theory, Vol Skinner, Quentin, Machiavelli: A Very Short Introduction (Oxford: OUP, 2000). Skinner, Quentin, Liberty before Liberalism, (Cambridge: 1998) Skinner, Quentin, ‚Meaning and Understanding in the History of Ideas’, History and Theory, 8:1 (1969), pp Viroli, Maurizio, ‘Machiavelli’s Realism’, Constellations, Vol. 14, No. 4, (2007), pp. 466-482 Watkins, Renne Neu, Humanism & Liberty: Writings on freedom from fifteenth-century Florence, (South Carolina: University of South Carolina, 1978) Worden, Blair, ‘Paradise Lost and republican tradition from Aristotle to Machiavelli – by William Walker’, Milton Quarterly, Vol. 45, No. 3, (2011), pp. 187-189 Yates, Francis A., Ideas and Ideals in the North European Renaissance, Vol Zerba, Michelle, ‘The Frauds of Humanism: Machiavelli, and the rhetoric of imposture’, Rhetorica: A Journal of the history of Rhetoric, Vol. 22, No. 3, (2004), pp. 215-240 -------------------------------------------- [ 1 ]. Mark Jurdjevic, ‘Machiavelli’s hybrid Republicanism’, The English Historical Review, Vol. 122, No. 499, (2012), pg. 1230. [ 10 ]. John P. McCormick, ‘Machiavelli against Republicanism: On the Cambridge schools “Guiccardinian Moments”’, Political Theory, Vol. 31, No. 5, (2003), pg. 616. [ 14 ]. Niccolo Machiavelli, The Prince, (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999), pg. 110. [ 30 ]. Plato, The Republic, translated with an introduction by Desmond lee, (London: Penguin, 1987), Book 4, pg. 8.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Throughout The Prince and Discourses, Niccolò Machiavelli talks in great length, and seems to endorse, power, deception, and cruelty. There is one passage in particular that I found to contradict Machiavelli’s viewpoint on dominance and to support the fact that he is perhaps a classical republican. The way Machiavelli praises Rome in Chapter 2 of Discourses shows that he believes there is a way to make the system work without a “prince” being feared by his subjects.…

    • 325 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although if one were to look back to Machiavelli’s book, The Prince, they would notice how…

    • 709 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Lao-Tzu vs. Machiavelli

    • 1382 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Jacobus, Lee A. "Niccolò Machiavelli The Qualities of the Prince." A World of Ideas: Essential Readings for College Writers. 8th ed. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin 's, 2006. 37-52. Print.…

    • 1382 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli was an author and an aspiring political figure who had a strong influence on several aspects of Europe’s government. Due to his critical writings in The Prince, many historians see Machiavelli as a cruel and diabolical political figure whose true intentions were to gain power for himself. However, after looking further into Machiavelli’s political past, one can see that Machiavelli is in fact an intelligent man who possesses a hidden motive to write his novel. In his work, he covered several topics that were used by future city-state leaders to help them become successful. Machiavelli proves to be an astute political mind who used his political experience to assess the actions of famous princes and to write The Prince as a noteworthy…

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    His writings are maddeningly and notoriously unsystematic, inconsistent and sometimes self-contradictory. He tends to appeal to experience and example in the place of rigorous logical analysis. Yet succeeding thinkers who more easily qualify as philosophers of the first rank did (and do) feel compelled to engage with his ideas, either to dispute them or to incorporate his insights into their own teachings. Machiavelli may have grazed at the fringes of philosophy, but the impact of his musings has been widespread and lasting. The terms “Machiavellian” or “Machiavellism” find regular purchase among philosophers concerned with a range of ethical, political, and psychological phenomena, even if Machiavelli did not invent “Machiavellism” and may not even have been a “Machiavellian” in the sense often ascribed to him.…

    • 1016 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nicolo Machiavelli's 'Discourses on Livy' written 1513-1517, is a commentary on the work of Titus Livy (59 BC - AD 17) a Roman historian who wrote a monumental history of Rome entitled 'Ab Urbe Condita' literally translating as 'from the founding of the city (Rome)'.…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During Niccolỏ Machiavelli’s lifetime, Italy’s city-states were in turmoil, and he was extremely interested in the politics behind the chaos.1 Machiavelli advised principalities on the proper way to conduct themselves by using his study of human nature. His understanding of human greed, disloyalty, and predictability created a vision of politics that utilizes power for a prince to maintain stability. Machiavelli created power-politics, his vision of how to stabilize a principality, in The Prince.…

    • 1205 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Introduction: Many people who have read The Prince by Niccoló Machiavelli were appalled by Machiavelli’s fierce and authorative tone he used to assert his ideas, especially his concept of how the ends justify the means, which slowly made people begin to criticize him and his book as immoral, wicked, and evil. For this reason, Machiavelli began to be insulted as a ruthless and evil person, or in the adopted term, a Machiavellian. Machiavelli didn’t wish to care for morals or spiritual integrity; however, he didn’t arrange to establish the approach to wickedness. As a matter of fact, he argues that the concept the ends justify the means are meant to be followed, but only when necessary commands for it to happen.…

    • 2621 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli wrote and studied the change in political beliefs in France and Italy. Machiavelli was a descendant from Florence like Dante but Machiavelli came from a different political climate. Florence had changed many times since Dante’s oligarchy succumbed to the power of rich Signori who gained control of the councils of government. The Signori passed laws that had the upper classes fight to take away power from the lower classes. Slowly the oligarchy became a monarchy with fake republics to be able to give the people a place to air their grievances.…

    • 1442 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Niccolo Machiavelli, known as the founding father of modern Political Science, lived between 1469 and 1752 in Florence in what is known today as Italy. He is not only known for his work in politics and diplomacy, as he was also a well-versed historian. He employed the method of citing historic figures and events in his justification for the suggestions he made in his famous book: The Prince. In the book that was dedicated to Lorenzo Medici, Machiavelli raises many important aspects relating to the political environment, governance and ethics of an individual in possession of political power citing political actions that should and should not be taken, the state briefly and violence in governing which is studied by political philosophers today as there are many ancient concepts…

    • 1933 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Lemon V. Kurtzman

    • 1108 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Audi, Robert. Democratic Authority and the Separation of Church and State. New York: Oxford University Press, 2011.…

    • 1108 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Plato, Machiavelli

    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Nicolo Machiavelli is known as being an realist who accepted that fact that humans are brutal, selfish, and fickle while Plato was an idealist who believed people could be ruled by a philosopher king who ruled over the warriors and tradesmen of his ideal republic with rationality. In his view the philosopher-king was in charge of making the state a "utopia" in that everyone had his/her place and all worked together for the common good of the state. Machiavelli said that this was a foolish idea. Machiavelli philosophy of government was centered on the ruler. He believed the king, or despot, had the right to do whatever was necessary for his own gain, or whatever the monarch considered the "good of the state" which he called Virtu’. Machiavelli believed the only purpose for a ruler was to make war, and protect its citizens from attacks by other states. He advocated the slaughter of surrendered generals in order to crush hopes of revolution - even rationalizing that it was worth the risk of revolution should it anger the people. Machiavelli believed a ruler should be immoral using deception and illusion for power and never allowing the people to know the “real” him…

    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Notably, Salman Rushdie who in the chapter is cited as calling Machiavelli a “democrat” and “messenger.” Although Klosterman writes “that’s a different argument for a different book,” (he is more concerned with the immutability of the negative connotation of “Machiavellian” we are nonetheless persuaded to consider this possibility. Perhaps Klosterman included this aside because it parallels his unconventional admiration for Newt Gingrich and in a like manner, although Machiavelli is "culturally unlikeable,” unconventional wisdom suggests the opposite. That is, society only views his mistake of “consciousness” but ignores what’s beneath the villainous veil—ambition, which is admirable (Klosterman…

    • 1402 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I found this essay quite radical but very interesting. I think that although I wish it weren’t true, that most politicians today have this sort of mindset. I believe this piece of literary work to be the most contradicting of Machiavelli’s…

    • 289 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Hard, William (1936) ‘The Spirit of the Constitution’, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol. 185, pp. 11-15.…

    • 3552 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics