Preview

Macchiavellian theories in "King Lear".

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
937 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Macchiavellian theories in "King Lear".
William Shakespeare's "King Lear" has within it many Machiavellian theories. This is evident once we examine the characters of Edmund, Goneril, and Regan. The Machiavellian principles relating to politics, ethics, and virtue are exemplified throughout "King Lear" play by these three characters. Machiavellian politics deal with acquiring power and forming very strong governments. For Machiavelli, power meant politics. Ethics can be best described as a branch of knowledge concerned with moral principles. The Theme of morality and ethics keeps evolving throughout "King Lear" and is demonstrated by these three characters. Virtue is the final principle highlighted by this Shakespeare play. By examining each of the three characters in more depth, we can better understand how Machiavellian theories apply to the play "King Lear"

Edmund is the most Machiavellian character in "King Lear" for many reasons. Edmund was born as illegitimated son of Gloucester. He had elder brother named Edgar who was legitimated son of Gloucester and beloved suitable heir. Edmund shows his avarice, greed, and envy towards Edger. Edmund states soliloquy "Thou, Nature, art my goddess; to thy law, ... now, gods, stand up for bastards."(I, ii, 1-22) This shows that he blame the nature that he never meant to born as an illegitimated, such as bastard son. He also decides that as concern everything think as a bastard, he will act as a bastard, the way of being Machiavellian as manipulating and taking advantage of others. Especially from the part of soliloquy, "legitimate Edgar, I must have your land." (I, ii, 16) He is showing his jealousy towards Edgar, and all that he has. Back in Shakespeare's time, land ownership was a form of wealth. Wealth equaled political power. Acquiring political power is a Machiavellian trait.

Edmund also criticized his father for being too superstitious and gullible in nature. He ridiculed his father, Gloucester for his beliefs and he thought he was morally superior to
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Loyalty Doesn T Run In Edmund's Blood
    • 71 Words
    • 1 Page

    Loyalty Doesn T Run In Edmund's Blood

    Loyalty doesn't run in Edmund's blood. In Act 3 scene 3 Gloucester believes by telling Edmund he's been helping Lear is a good thing. The things he doesn't know is that Edmund is a "snake" and will tell Cornwall this information. The audience knows that Edmund is a "snake" but Gloucester is blind in the mind. When an opportunity is there for Edmund he grab this opportunity and betrayed his…

    • 71 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Edmund Vs. Existence Scrub
    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Edmund Vs. Existence Scrub

    Edmund begins his journey as a greedy, self-entitled, deceiving bully. It is because of these terrible faults in his character that he is so easily swayed by the White Witch. By bribing him with Turkish Delight and a chance to become a king, something bigger and better than his highly successful and well-respected brother Peter could seemingly ever be, he betrays his…

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Social Order In Shakespeare's King Lear
    • 1190 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Social Order In Shakespeare's King Lear

    Shakespeare informs the reader of the modifications needed in society to prevent capitalism from overthrowing the traditional aristocratic ways. Through Goneril and Regan, the dangers of bourgeoisies and proteltarists are evident and the negative effects they cause. With the differing social orders, lineage becomes trivial. Blood no longer matters and wealth depends heavily on market exchange. Scholars highlight the difficulties and dangers of utopian concepts, especially when they are centered on bourse. He discusses the many social climbers who attempt to behave badly to gain status from the new capitalist power. The conflict between the idea of human liberty and the traditional order is resolved in the play by transforming the king into an item of pathos. By “humanising” the king, Shakespeare is able to fuse together the two ideas regarding absolutist authority and individual…

    • 1190 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    King Lear - Brassed Off - Related Text
    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages

    King Lear - Brassed Off - Related Text

    Through ‘The Tragedy of King Lear’, Shakespeare represents a distinctive voice in which influences the way we perceive the role of power play in our world as it broadens our understanding of the universality and complexity of power play. Compared with the 21st century film ‘Brassed Off’, we are presented with an insight into the various means of attaining power and its ability to uncover the true nature of people within their struggle for supremacy and control. Shakespeare presents 'The Tragedy of King Lear' as the struggle for power and the political and filial machinations that the desire for power can create. Shakespeare focuses the distinctive voice around the central character King Lear who represents a conceited oppressor whose fall from power prompts the downfall of the Kingdom that he once controlled. The main cause of his demise is his failure to understand and possess a clear vision of the people around him. In Lear's eyes, he sees his eldest daughter Goneril’s facade to be a loyal and true expression, 'Sir I love you more than word can wield the matter/Dearer than eyesight, space and liberty', although Lear's inability to see the truth results in his manipulation and the banishing of his loyal acquaintances; his youngest daughter Cordelia and his dear friend Kent. Although Lear can physically see, it is the understanding, awareness and direction that he lacks and is blind to. In contrast to Lear being physically capable of seeing, Gloucester becomes physically blind but gains the form of vision that Lear lacks, and consequently Gloucester evades a corollary comparable to Lear's. Here Shakespeare presents his distinctive voice on power play through the depiction of the manipulation and motivation behind the characters struggle for sovereignty. His clever use of his characters and their relationships allows us to gain an insight into the condition of the human psyche throughout their individual attempts at power and highlights the complexities associated…

    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Edmund In King Lear Essay
    • 654 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Edmund In King Lear Essay

    Edmund feels a desire for the recognition denied to him by his status as a bastard.…

    • 654 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Unchecked Power in Shakespeare's Macbeth and King Lear
    • 1448 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Unchecked Power in Shakespeare's Macbeth and King Lear

    In many of the plays by William Shakespeare, the central character goes through internal and external changes that ultimately shake their foundations to the core. Numerous theories have been put forth to explain the sequence of tragedies Shakespeare wrote during this period by linking it to some experience of melancholy, anger, despair, and the antagonist 's ultimate fall from grace in their lust for power. But such theories overlook the fact that it is in this very same period and in the same tragic works that portray the heights to which human nature can rise and fall in its purest and noblest, if not happiest terms. Surely the creation of so much light alongside the darkness and the perfection of the artistic medium through which Shakespeare gives them expression argues against the idea that the greedy side of human nature is his chief concern. His efforts to portray human life in its rarest form and not only the dark depths, but also the treasure rooms of our being. He tries to pierce beneath the superficial motives and forces of surface behavior, social, and cultural expressions and to the deeper levels of individual character and human nature. Shakespeare then places these aspects of human existence in their true relation to the wider field of universal life. In relation to the tragic hero, there are many similarities between the tragic heroes in Macbeth and King Lear. However, the differences between the two outline the re-occurring themes in both plays. In Shakespeare 's plays the central characters ' own weaknesses and lust for power lead to corruption. The unchecked power in Shakespeare 's Macbeth and King Lear ultimately leads to corruption, tragedy, and the hero 's fall from grace.…

    • 1448 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Power: King Lear and the Pursuit of Happyness
    • 958 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Power: King Lear and the Pursuit of Happyness

    True power is defined as self-awareness and self-control. Shakespeare portrays this idea through symbolic blindness and parallel structuring between characters. King Lear personifies the absence of personal power at the beginning of the play as he creates a “love contest” between his daughters, revealing his need for flattery to affirm his position. It is through his lack of self-awareness that he is vulnerable to manipulation and deception despite his initial authoritative power. Kent, Lear’s loyal companion who himself has personal power, attempts to help Lear “see” through his ego: “when majesty falls to folly...” he proclaims (1.1.144). The characters of Lear and Gloucester, both fathers, are parallel: eventually, Gloucester's eyes are plucked out in Act 3 Scene 7, in which characterises a literal and metaphorical blindness symbolic of his inability to "see" the truth about his children, like Lear. Towards the end, Lear states “I have too long taken notice of this” and it is through Edgar, Gloucester’s true son and Kent in disguise, that they come to a realisation. Edgar and Kent are the true characters with personal power that guide Lear into breaking through the “blindness” that has been as a result of his ego and avarice. We gain an understanding that true power is not a measurement of the authority or control one has over others but the control one has over one’s self.…

    • 958 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Progress In Shakespeare's King Lear
    • 1499 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Progress In Shakespeare's King Lear

    It has always been in human nature to want to progress. Wherever we go, we always hear about the “next big thing,” whether it be a new smartphone or a breakthrough in medicine that touches on many social issues, bringing up a debate on whether or not the end justifies the means. This will for progress sometimes ends with negative results, however, no matter what the original intention may have been. There are many examples in Shakespeare’s King Lear that expertly demonstrates that, although the goal may be aiming for improvement or progress, the end does not justify the means.…

    • 1499 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    King Lear Research Paper
    • 1477 Words
    • 6 Pages

    King Lear Research Paper

    In the play King Lear by William Shakespeare, King Lear is an old foolish man who suffers several flaws in the same way, he is blind to the truth, and his inability to see the truth impacts his decisions making and his poor judgment. Throughout act one and two, King Lear decisions lead to several consequences, which alter his life and the lives of those around him. A few of King Lear’s flaws which demonstrates the great deed of one man’s consequences are, his actions due to his blindness, rash decision making and exhibits a great deed of pride and arrogance.…

    • 1477 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    King Lear: The Parallel Journeys Of Families
    • 2231 Words
    • 9 Pages

    King Lear: The Parallel Journeys Of Families

    The infamous playwright, William Shakespeare’s, King Lear relays the story of a tragic hero and his family while paralleling it to the sub-plot within the tragedy. The story of these two reflecting groups of characters displays the obliteration of once potent characters’ power, and the inversion of social order. King Lear, the father of Goneril, Regan and Cordelia experiences a digressing journey comparable to that of Gloucester, the father of Edmund, his illegitimate son, and Edgar. Both Lear and Gloucester make a reprehensible decision in confiding in their children that they thought were the most honorable, but were faced with…

    • 2231 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    King Lear Slideshow
    • 417 Words
    • 3 Pages

    King Lear Slideshow

    This realization causes King lear to reconsider his values and understand himself, and helps him want to tackle the Conclusion of King Lear Order and Chaos is seen throughout King Lear, and one of the more common elements is loyalty and betrayal. Between both sons and daughter towards their parents. Which is something that can be applied in reality that is also seen between parents and children. Now it is just a matter of which…

    • 417 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    King Lear Essay
    • 1494 Words
    • 6 Pages

    King Lear Essay

    Shakespeare’s plays were written in the Elizabethan era, which profoundly influenced his writing. During the Elizabethan time, there was the idea that God had set a place for everything in the universe, in hierarchical order. The Elizabethan’s called this, The Great Chain of Being. During this time if someone were to step out of his or her place in this divine line, it would not only be extremely uncommon but it would be sinful, inhuman. That power thirsty human would be succumbing to their inner animal, and therefore step down a rank on The Great Chain of Being. The Great Chain of Being influenced all beliefs throughout the Elizabethan era, and that is evident through Shakespeare’s writing. The symbols and motifs he used in his play King Lear, are undoubtedly connected to Elizabethan beliefs and views.…

    • 1494 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    King Lear Madness Analysis
    • 671 Words
    • 3 Pages

    King Lear Madness Analysis

    The storm that Lear describes is not entirely literal, it represents the tests and the tragedies that he endured. Shakespeare makes it clear that, even though the tests drove him deeper into madness, they opened his eyes each time and started his path back towards sanity. Lear doesn’t stop here; rather, he moves to a digression about justice. Lear delves into an intellectual conversation, saying, “Robes and furred gowns hide all. Plate sin with gold, // and the strong lance of justice hurtless breaks. // Arm it in rags, a pygmy’s straw does pierce it.”(4.6.181) In this quote, Lear is saying that money can cover up injustice to the point where it is unreacheable, but without money justice is easily served. In this final scene with Lear, Shakespeare…

    • 671 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Examples Of Evidence In King Lear
    • 210 Words
    • 1 Page

    Examples Of Evidence In King Lear

    The second piece of evidence is found in act one, ur scene two. Here, Edmund tricks his father, the earl of Gloucester, into thinking his other son is plotting against him. Edmund does this in hopes he can steal his brother’s land. This shows the potential of power being used for evil.…

    • 210 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Moral Order in "King Lear" according to A. C. Bradley
    • 1070 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Moral Order in "King Lear" according to A. C. Bradley

    According to A. C. Bradley, the main source of calamity and death in the tragic play is never good. In Shakespeare 's drama, evil is the force responsible for the phenomenon of tragedy. This force is "not mere imperfection but plain moral evil" (A. C. Bradley 689). In King Lear, evil takes its core power from greediness and ingratitude of king 's two daughters, Goneril and Regan. Their intentions and deliberate actions are pure evil, "Beneath is all the fiend 's. There 's hell, there 's darkness, there is the sulphurous pit…" (4.6. 143-144). The reason why the two sisters praise their father in the beginning of the play is justified by their desire to inherit Lear 's kingdom and supremacy. Goneril 's and Regan 's declarations of their great love for King Lear are insincere, because their actions contradict with what they proclaim, "His [Lear 's] daughters seek his [Lear 's] death…" (3.4. 163). Because of Goneril 's utter ungratefulness and lack of love or compassion, she mistreats her father and insults his dignity, "She [Goneril] has abated me [Lear] of half my train; Looked black upon me; struck me with her tongue, Most serpent-like, upon the very heart" (2.4. 175-178). Her sister, Regan, due to her alike vile nature, shows her entire support and endorsement to such a behavior. Edmund 's character comes from the same evil ground as the one of the two vicious sisters. He is, too, engrossed by the desire to own his father 's land, and…

    • 1070 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics