Literature Review and Empirical

Only available on StudyMode
  • Download(s) : 58
  • Published : May 2, 2012
Open Document
Text Preview
Literature Review and Empirical Analysis of Unemployment Insurance Recipiency Ratios F INAL REPORT
PREPARED FOR: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE SERVICE DIVISION OF RESEARCH AND POLICY CONTRACT NUMBER: K-6826-8-00-80-30 PREPARED BY:

THE LEWIN GROUP
DAVID C. WITTENBURG, PH.D. MICHAEL FISHMAN, M.P.A. DAVID STAPLETON, PH.D. SCOTT SCRIVNER ADAM TUCKER

UNDER SUBCONTRACT TO RUTGERS UNIVERSITY

June 18, 1999

Literature Review and Empirical Analysis of Unemployment Insurance Recipiency Ratios FINAL REPORT
PREPARED FOR: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE SERVICE DIVISION OF RESEARCH AND POLICY CONTRACT NUMBER: K-6826-8-00-80-30 PREPARED BY:

THE LEWIN GROUP
DAVID C. WITTENBURG, PH.D. MICHAEL FISHMAN, M.P.A. DAVID STAPLETON, PH.D. SCOTT SCRIVNER ADAM TUCKER

UNDER SUBCONTRACT TO RUTGERS UNIVERSITY

June 18, 1999

The Lewin Group, Inc.

156059

Table of Contents
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................................................... E-1 A. B. C. D. OVERVIEW......................................................................................................................................................................E-1 PURPOSE AND METHODOLOGY....................................................................................................................................E-1 UI RECIPIENCY RATE MEASURES...............................................................................................................................E-2 FACTORS THAT INFLUENCE THE STANDARD RATE...................................................................................................E-3 1. Literature Review...................................................................................................................................................E-4 2. Empirical Analysis.................................................................................................................................................E-4 E. FACTORS THAT INFLUENCE THE A LTERNATIVE UI RECIPIENCY RATE M EASURES ............................................E-5 F. DESIGN OPTIONS ...........................................................................................................................................................E-6 I. A. B. C. II. A. B. C. 1. 2. 3. 4. D. III. A. B. 1. 2. 3. C. 1. IV. A. B. 1. 2. 3. 4. C. 1. 2. 3. D. INTRODUCTION ..............................................................................................................................................................1 OVERVIEW......................................................................................................................................................................... 1 PURPOSE............................................................................................................................................................................. 1 ORGANIZATION OF THE REPORT ..................................................................................................................................... 2 UI PROGRAM DESCRIPTION AND MAJOR LEGISLATIVE CHANGES .................................................3 OVERVIEW......................................................................................................................................................................... 3 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION .................................................................................................................................................. 3 FEDERAL LEGISLATIVE HISTORY ................................................................................................................................... 4 Federal Extensions of UI Benefits ...........................................................................................................................4 UI Benefit...
tracking img